Literature DB >> 33386980

Scientometric evaluation of highly cited scientists in the field of forensic science and legal medicine.

Alan Wayne Jones1.   

Abstract

A publically available database of the most highly cited scientists in all disciplines was used to identify people that belonged to the subject category "forensic science and legal medicine." This bibliometric information was derived from Elsevier's SCOPUS database containing eight million scientists with at least five articles as author or co-author. The top 100,000 most highly cited scientists were identified and ranked according to six citation metrics; total number of citations, H-index, H-index adjusted for co-authorship, citations to single-authored papers, citations to single or first author papers and, citations to single, first, or last-authored papers. The eight million entries in the SCOPUS database were sub-divided into 22 main subject categories and 176 sub-categories, one of which was legal and forensic medicine. The citation databases were provided as supplementary material in two articles published in PLoS Biology in 2019 and 2020. Among the top 100,000 most highly cited scientists, there were only 30 allocated to the legal and forensic medicine category, according to the 2019 PLoS Biology article. The updated database from 2020 also included the names of people within the top-cited 2% of their scientific discipline. This increased the number of forensic practitioners to 215 from a total of 10,158 individuals in this subject category. This article takes a closer look at these highly cited forensic scientists, the countries where they work, the particular research field in which they publish, and their composite citation scores with and without self-citations. The top ten most cited individuals in both databases (2019 and 2020) were the same and these should therefore be considered an elite group among all forensic practitioners.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Forensic science; Legal medicine; Publications

Year:  2021        PMID: 33386980      PMCID: PMC7870596          DOI: 10.1007/s00414-020-02491-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  2 in total

1.  Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations.

Authors:  Meredith T Niles; Lesley A Schimanski; Erin C McKiernan; Juan Pablo Alperin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Authorship and citation manipulation in academic research.

Authors:  Eric A Fong; Allen W Wilhite
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Scientometric analysis of the forensic science literature for fibre as an evidence type: Access and data availability.

Authors:  Virginie Galais; Holly Fleming; Niamh Nic Daéid; Hervé Ménard
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Synerg       Date:  2022-05-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.