Literature DB >> 33386882

Suture tape augmentation ACL repair, stable knee, and favorable PROMs, but a re-rupture rate of 11% within 2 years.

Christiaan H W Heusdens1, Karen Blockhuys2, Ella Roelant2,3, Lieven Dossche2, Francis Van Glabbeek2,3, Pieter Van Dyck2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to investigate clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair using the suture tape augmentation (STA) technique.
METHODS: This prospective interventional case series included 35 patients who underwent STA ACL repair and were all followed up for 2 years. The ACL rupture was between 4 and 12 weeks old and per-operatively confirmed repairable. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Lysholm and Tegner scores were collected together with return to work (RTW), return to sport (RTS), re-rupture, and re-intervention rate. Lachman testing was performed and ACL healing was evaluated on MRI using a grading scale based on the ACL's morphology and signal intensity with grade 1 representing good ACL healing and grade 3 representing poor ACL healing.
RESULTS: The number of patients who returned to their pre-rupture level for IKDC, Lysholm, and Tegner scores at 2 years of follow-up are 17/26 (65.4%), 13/25 (52.0%), and 18/27 (66.7%) patients, respectively. Median RTW and RTS periods were 5.5 weeks (range 0-32 weeks) and 6 months (range 2-22 months), respectively. The Lachman side-to-side difference decreased significantly (P < 0.001) to less than 3 mm after surgery and remained stable. Four patients [11.4%, 95% CI (3.2, 26.7)] suffered from a re-rupture and three other patients [8.6%, 95% CI (1.8, 23.1)] needed a re-intervention for another reason than re-rupture. MRI follow-up of 31 patients showed overall grade 1 ACL healing in 14 (45.2%) patients, grade 2 ACL healing in 11 (35.5%) patients, and grade 3 ACL healing in 6 (19.4%) patients. A higher risk of re-rupture was associated with grade 3 ACL healing at 6 months post-operatively and a pre-operative Tegner score of  ≥  7.
CONCLUSION: This study shows that treatment of the acute, repairable ACL with the STA technique leads to a stable knee and favorable patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). However, the re-rupture rate of 11.4% within the 2-year follow-up is a concern. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament; Anterior cruciate ligament preservation; Anterior cruciate ligament repair; Anterior cruciate ligament rupture; Internal bracing; Suture tape augmentation; Suture tape reconstruction

Year:  2021        PMID: 33386882     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06399-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  8 in total

1.  Patient-reported evaluation on giving way is important for return to preinjury activity level after Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Takashi Ohsawa; Masashi Kimura; Hirotaka Chikuda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair with Internal Brace Ligament Augmentation.

Authors:  William T Wilson; Graeme P Hopper; Paul A Byrne; Gordon M MacKay
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2016-10-26

3.  Diffusion tensor imaging of the anterior cruciate ligament following primary repair with internal bracing: A longitudinal study.

Authors:  Pieter Van Dyck; Martijn Froeling; Christiaan H W Heusdens; Jan Sijbers; Annemie Ribbens; Thibo Billiet
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Clinical and radiological results after Internal Brace suture versus the all-inside reconstruction technique in anterior cruciate ligament tears 12 to 18 months after index surgery.

Authors:  Georg Mattiassich; Reinhold Ortmaier; Harald Kindermann; Jürgen Barthofer; Imre Vasvary; Stefan Tino Kulnik; Klaus Katzensteiner; Iris Leister
Journal:  Sportverletz Sportschaden       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 1.077

6.  Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging following Arthroscopic Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair.

Authors:  Jelle P van der List; Douglas N Mintz; Gregory S DiFelice
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2019-03-26

7.  Arthroscopic primary repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears seems safe but higher level of evidence is needed: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recent literature.

Authors:  Jelle P van der List; Harmen D Vermeijden; Inger N Sierevelt; Gregory S DiFelice; Arthur van Noort; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Medial stabilised total knee arthroplasty achieves comparable clinical outcomes when compared to other TKA designs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature.

Authors:  Sohail Nisar; Kashif Ahmad; Jeya Palan; Hemant Pandit; Bernard van Duren
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.114

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Anterior cruciate ligament repair using dynamic intraligamentary stabilization provides a similarly successful outcome as all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a faster psychological recovery in moderately active patients.

Authors:  M Enes Kayaalp; Serkan Sürücü; Mehmet Halis Çerçi; Mahmut Aydın; Mahir Mahiroğulları
Journal:  Jt Dis Relat Surg       Date:  2022-07-06

2.  RetroBRACE: clinical, socioeconomic and functional-biomechanical outcomes 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation in comparison to ACL reconstruction and healthy controls-experimental protocol of a non-randomised single-centre comparative study.

Authors:  Sebastian Müller; Linda Bühl; Corina Nüesch; Geert Pagenstert; Annegret Mündermann; Christian Egloff
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.