Literature DB >> 33386675

A systematic Review of Healthcare Professionals' Core Competency Instruments.

Fatma Yaqoob Mohammed Al Jabri1, Tarja Kvist2, Mina Azimirad3, Hannele Turunen4,5.   

Abstract

While technical and profession-specific competencies are paramount in the delivery of healthcare services, the cross-cutting core competencies of healthcare professionals play an important role in healthcare transformation, innovation and the integration of roles. This systematic review describes the characteristics and psychometric properties of existing instruments for assessing healthcare professionals' core competencies in clinical settings. It was guided by the JBI methodology and used the COSMIN checklist (Mokkink et al., 2018) to evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies. A database search (CINAHL, Scopus and PubMed) and additional manual search were undertaken for peer-reviewed papers with abstracts, published in English between 2008 and 2019. The search identified nine studies that were included in the synthesis demonstrating core competencies in professionalism, ethical and legal issues, research and evidence-based practice, personal and professional development, teamwork and collaboration, leadership and management, and patient-centred care. Few instruments addressed competencies in quality improvement, safety, communication or health information technology. The findings demonstrate the reviewed tools' validity and reliability, and pave the way for a comprehensive evaluation and assessment of core competencies into clinical practice. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Competence Assessment; Core Competency; Healthcare Professionals; Nurses and Physicians; Psychometrics Testing; Validity and Reliability

Year:  2021        PMID: 33386675     DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Health Sci        ISSN: 1441-0745            Impact factor:   1.857


  2 in total

Review 1.  Identification of tools used to assess the external validity of randomized controlled trials in reviews: a systematic review of measurement properties.

Authors:  Andres Jung; Julia Balzer; Tobias Braun; Kerstin Luedtke
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  Development of the Student Practice Evaluation Form - Revised (Second Edition) (SPEF-R2): The second action research cycle.

Authors:  Anne-Maree Caine; Chris Herd; Jodie Copley; Merrill Turpin; Jennifer Fleming
Journal:  Aust Occup Ther J       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 1.757

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.