PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to clarify the usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in the differential diagnosis of localized autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and the evaluation of response to steroids. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed 40 patients with localized AIP and 71 patients with PDAC who underwent abdominal MRI with DWI (b = 0 and 1000 s/mm2). Their ADC values at the lesion sites and five MRI findings useful for diagnosing AIP were evaluated. In addition, ADC values before and after steroid therapy were compared in 28 patients with localized AIP. RESULTS: The median ADC value was significantly lower for localized AIP than for PDAC (1.057 × 10-3 vs 1.376 × 10-3 mm2/s, P < 0.001). In the ROC curve analysis, the area under the curve was 0.957 and optimal cut-off value of ADC for differentiating localized AIP from PDAC was 1.188 × 10-3 mm2/s. ADC value ≤ 1.188 × 10-3 mm2/s showed the highest sensitivity and accuracy among the MRI findings (92.6% and 90.7%, respectively), and when combined with one or more other MRI findings, showed 96.3% specificity. The median ADC values before and after steroid therapy (mean 7.9 days) were 1.061 × 10-3 and 1.340 × 10-3 mm2/s, respectively, and ADC values were significantly elevated after steroid induction (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The measurement of ADC values was useful for the differential diagnosis of localized AIP and PDAC and for the early determination of the effect of steroid therapy.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to clarify the usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in the differential diagnosis of localized autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and the evaluation of response to steroids. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed 40 patients with localized AIP and 71 patients with PDAC who underwent abdominal MRI with DWI (b = 0 and 1000 s/mm2). Their ADC values at the lesion sites and five MRI findings useful for diagnosing AIP were evaluated. In addition, ADC values before and after steroid therapy were compared in 28 patients with localized AIP. RESULTS: The median ADC value was significantly lower for localized AIP than for PDAC (1.057 × 10-3 vs 1.376 × 10-3 mm2/s, P < 0.001). In the ROC curve analysis, the area under the curve was 0.957 and optimal cut-off value of ADC for differentiating localized AIP from PDAC was 1.188 × 10-3 mm2/s. ADC value ≤ 1.188 × 10-3 mm2/s showed the highest sensitivity and accuracy among the MRI findings (92.6% and 90.7%, respectively), and when combined with one or more other MRI findings, showed 96.3% specificity. The median ADC values before and after steroid therapy (mean 7.9 days) were 1.061 × 10-3 and 1.340 × 10-3 mm2/s, respectively, and ADC values were significantly elevated after steroid induction (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The measurement of ADC values was useful for the differential diagnosis of localized AIP and PDAC and for the early determination of the effect of steroid therapy.
Authors: H Irie; H Honda; S Baba; T Kuroiwa; K Yoshimitsu; T Tajima; M Jimi; T Sumii; K Masuda Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 1998-05 Impact factor: 3.959