| Literature DB >> 33386449 |
Jun Liu1, Yigang Pei2,3, Yu Zhang1, Yifan Wu1, Fuquan Liu4, Shanzhi Gu5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prognostic value of baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) texture analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and microwave ablation (MWA).Entities:
Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma; Microwave ablation; Prognosis; Texture analysis; Transarterial chemoembolization
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33386449 PMCID: PMC8286952 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02891-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY)
Fig. 1Flowchart for screening HCC patients treated with TACE and MWA in our hospital
Characteristics of the patients included in this study
| Variables | Number of patients |
|---|---|
| Gender | |
| Male | 88 (86.3%) |
| Female | 14 (13.7%) |
| Age (y) | |
| ≤ 60 | 58 (56.9%) |
| > 60 | 44 (43.1%) |
| BCLC stage | |
| 0 | 7 (6.9%) |
| A | 64 (62.7%) |
| B | 31 (30.4%) |
| Child–Pugh class | |
| A | 86 (84.3%) |
| B | 15 (14.7%) |
| C* | 1 (1.0%) |
| Cause of disease | |
| HBV | 89 (87.3%) |
| Othersa | 13 (12.7%) |
| Closing to the extrahepatic organ | |
| No | 42 (41.2%) |
| Yes | 60 (58.8%) |
| Closing to a large vessel | |
| No | 49 (48.0%) |
| Yes | 53 (52.0%) |
| Tumor maximum diameter (cm) | |
| ≤ 3 | 43 (42.2%) |
| 3–5 | 32 (31.4%) |
| ≥ 5 | 27 (26.5%) |
| Lesion number ( | |
| | 78 (76.5%) |
| | 24 (23.5%) |
| TBIL (μmol/L) | |
| ≤ 20 | 70 (68.6%) |
| > 20 | 32 (31.4%) |
| ALB (g/L) | |
| ≤ 35 | 35 (34.3%) |
| > 35 | 67 (65.7%) |
| ALT (U/L) | |
| ≤ 40 | 65 (63.7%) |
| > 40 | 37 (36.3%) |
| ALP (U/L) | |
| ≤ 65 | 48 (47.1%) |
| > 65 | 54 (52.9%) |
| GGT(U/L) | |
| ≤ 50 | 42 (41.2%) |
| > 50 | 60 (58.8%) |
| PT(s) | |
| ≤ 13 | 43 (42.2%) |
| > 13 | 59 (57.8%) |
| AFP(ng/mL) | |
| ≤ 20 | 42 (41.2%) |
| 20 ~ 200 | 32 (31.4%) |
| ≥ 200 | 28 (27.5%) |
AFP Alpha fetoprotein level, ALT alanine aminotransferase, TBIL total bilirubin, GGT glutamyl transferase, ALB albumin, ALP alkaline phosphatase, PT prothrombin time
*After protecting the liver and relieving jaundice, Child–Pugh C class was degraded to Child–Pugh B class, and the patient can tolerate the following treatment
aIncluding 1 case of HCV, 1 case of cirrhosis due to schistosomiasis, 1 case of Budd–Chiari syndrome, 2 case of alcoholic cirrhosis, and 8 cases of unknown cause
bIncluding 18 cases of two nodules, 6 cases of three nodules
Fig. 2An example of ROI segmentation and VOI generation on T2WI. a Shows that the 2D region of interest (ROI) was delineated manually on a T2W image. b Presented that 3D view was generated automatically based on all 2D ROIs of the tumor
Information about texture features
| Feature category | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| First-order texture features | Mean | Average intensity across the VOI |
| Variance | Dispersion from the mean value | |
| Skewedness | Asymmetry | |
| Kurtosis | Peakedness or pointedness | |
| Perc1%, Perc10%, Perc50%, Perc90% and Perc99% | MR number percentiles indicate the attenuation value below which each percentage of voxels in the respective VOI area lie | |
| GLCM features | Entropy | Measure of the randomness of the gray levels |
| AngScMom (angular second moment) | Measure of image homogeneity | |
| DifEntrp (difference entropy) | Measure of the randomness of the difference of neighboring voxels'gray levels | |
| Difvarnc (difference variance) | Measure of variations of difference of gray levels between voxel pairs | |
| InvDfMom (inverse difference moment) | Measure of the image homogeneity | |
| SumAverg (sum average) | Measure of the overall image brightness | |
| SumEntrp (sum entropy) | Measure of the randomness of the sum of gray levels of neighboring voxels | |
| SumOfSqs (sum of squares) | Measure of the spread in the gray level distribution | |
| SumVarnc (sum variance) | Measure of the spread in the sum of the gray levels of voxel pairs distribution | |
| Contrast | Measure of local image variations | |
| Correlat | Measure of image linearity |
Fig. 3Main steps of MR image texture analysis
Comparing the minimum misdiagnosis rate in three MR sequences using the selective feature methods combined with different feature analysis methods between two groups dichotomized by 3-year survival
| PCA ( | LDA ( | NDA ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1WI | |||
| FiSher | 18 (17.64%) | 32 (31.37%) | 16 (15.69%) |
| MI | 31 (30.39%) | 21 (20.59%) | 21 (20.59%) |
| POE + ACC | 33 (32.35%) | 20 (19.60%) | 15 (14.70%) |
| T2WI | |||
| FiSher | 32 (31.37%) | 31 (30.39%) | 13 (12.75%) |
| MI | 34 (33.33%) | 31 (30.39%) | |
| POE + ACC | 33 (32.35%) | 21 (20.59%) | 16 (15.69%) |
| T1WI enhanced | |||
| FiSher | 35 (34.31%) | 34 (33.33%) | 21 (20.59%) |
| MI | 23 (22.54%) | 17 (16.66%) | 12 (11.76%) |
| POE + ACC | 15 (14.70%) | 30 (29.41%) | 11 (10.78%) |
n = the case of misdiagnosis, % = the minimum misdiagnosis rate, FiSher = Fisher coefficient, POE + ACC = classification error probability combined with average correlation coefficients
MI mutual information coefficient, PCA principal component analysis, LDA linear discriminant analysis, NDA nonlinear discriminant analysis
The lowest misdiagnosis rate
Differences in the optimal texture features on T2W imaging between two groups dichotomized by 3-year survival
| Texture features on T2WI | ≥ 3 years | < 3 years | Cutoff value | Sensitivity | Specificity | AUC (95%CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SumEntrp(2,0) | 1.206 ± 0.123 | 1.319 ± 0.175 | 0.004* | 1.250 | 70.37% | 72.00% | 0.709 (0.610–0.794) |
| Correlat(1,− 1) | 0.933 ± 0.049 | 0.956 ± 0.036 | 0.032* | 0.978 | 44.44% | 94.67% | 0.672 (0.572–0.762) |
| Entropy(3,0) | 1.441 ± 0.173 | 1.595 ± 0.250 | 0.006* | 1.619 | 51.85% | 86.67% | 0.702 (0.603–0.788) |
| SumEntrp(3,0) | 1.108 ± 0.136 | 1.245 ± 0.194 | 0.002* | 1.282 | 51.85% | 89.33% | 0.720 (0.622–0.804) |
| Entropy(4,0) | 1.408 ± 0.177 | 1.589 ± 0.238 | 0.001* | 1.622 | 51.85% | 90.67% | 0.729 (0.632–0.812) |
| SumEntrp(4,0) | 1.054 ± 0.141 | 1.211 ± 0.185 | < 0.001* | 1.075 | 77.78% | 65.33% | 0.753 (0.657–0.833) |
| SumEntrp(0,4) | 1.075 ± 0.186 | 1.241 ± 0.172 | < 0.001* | 1.222 | 66.6% | 78.6% | 0.760 (0.665–0.839) |
| Entropy(5,0) | 1.370 ± 0.189 | 1.564 ± 0.247 | < 0.001* | 1.531 | 55.56% | 82.67% | 0.724 (0.627–0.808) |
| SumEntrp(5,0) | 1.000 ± 0.160 | 1.162 ± 0.201 | < 0.001* | 1.105 | 62.96% | 78.67% | 0.736 (0.640–0.819) |
| SumAverg(2,0) | 49.642 ± 10.517 | 49.230 ± 6.323 | 0.811 | – | – | – | – |
Texture features = the optimal feature group. The values of texture features = the mean value ± standard deviation for texture features. The number in the parenthesis for texture features on T2WI represented the coordinate of the matrix
AUC area under the curve, CI confidence interval
*Statistical significance
Multivariate analysis for overall survival with Cox proportional hazards model
| Parameter | B | SE | Wald | HR (95%CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCLC stage | 1.380 | 0.404 | 0.001 | 11.648 | 3.977(1.800–8.786) |
| ALB | 0.774 | 0.389 | 0.047 | 3.962 | 2.168(1.012–4.646) |
| Correlat (1,− 1) | 1.080 | 0.420 | 0.010 | 6.611 | 2.944(1.293–6.705) |
| SumEntrp (3,0) | 1.009 | 0.413 | 0.015 | 5.951 | 2.742(1.219–6.166) |
The number in the parenthesis represented the coordinate of matrix in various second-order texture features
BCLC Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer, ALB albumin, B partial regression coefficient, SE standard error, Wald = Wald coefficient, HR = hazard ratio, CI confidence interval
Fig. 4Kaplan–Meier survival curves for DFS separated by BCLC (P < 0.001) (a), Correlat (1,− 1) (P = 0.023) (c), SumEntrp (3,0) (P < 0.001) (d), and for LRFS separated by BCLC (P = 0.007) (b). Note. The number in the parentheses was the patients with HCC recurrence (a, c, d) or local recurrence (b) in during the follow-up Period