Literature DB >> 33386390

Mutant P53 induces MELK expression by release of wild-type P53-dependent suppression of FOXM1.

Lakshmi Reddy Bollu1, Jonathan Shepherd1, Dekuang Zhao1, Yanxia Ma1, William Tahaney1,2, Corey Speers3, Abhijit Mazumdar1, Gordon B Mills4,5, Powel H Brown6,7.   

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive form of breast cancer, and is associated with a poor prognosis due to frequent distant metastasis and lack of effective targeted therapies. Previously, we identified maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase (MELK) to be highly expressed in TNBCs as compared with ER-positive breast cancers. Here we determined the molecular mechanism by which MELK is overexpressed in TNBCs. Analysis of publicly available data sets revealed that MELK mRNA is elevated in p53-mutant breast cancers. Consistent with this observation, MELK protein levels are higher in p53-mutant vs. p53 wild-type breast cancer cells. Furthermore, inactivation of wild-type p53, by loss or mutation of the p53 gene, increases MELK expression, whereas overexpression of wild-type p53 in p53-null cells reduces MELK promoter activity and MELK expression. We further analyzed MELK expression in breast cancer data sets and compared that with known wild-type p53 target genes. This analysis revealed that MELK expression strongly correlates with genes known to be suppressed by wild-type p53. Promoter deletion studies identified a p53-responsive region within the MELK promoter that did not map to the p53 consensus response elements, but to a region containing a FOXM1-binding site. Consistent with this result, knockdown of FOXM1 reduced MELK expression in p53-mutant TNBC cells and expression of wild-type p53 reduced FOXM1 expression. ChIP assays demonstrated that expression of wild-type p53 reduces binding of E2F1 (a critical transcription factor controlling FOXM1 expression) to the FOXM1 promoter, thereby, reducing FOXM1 expression. These results show that wild-type p53 suppresses FOXM1 expression, and thus MELK expression, through indirect mechanisms. Overall, these studies demonstrate that wild-type p53 represses MELK expression by inhibiting E2F1A-dependent transcription of FOXM1 and that mutation-driven loss of wild-type p53, which frequently occurs in TNBCs, induces MELK expression by suppressing FOXM1 expression and activity in p53-mutant breast cancers.

Year:  2020        PMID: 33386390     DOI: 10.1038/s41523-019-0143-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer        ISSN: 2374-4677


  75 in total

1.  Expression of Melk, a new protein kinase, during early mouse development.

Authors:  B S Heyer; H Kochanowski; D Solter
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.780

Review 2.  The regulation and function of the NUAK family.

Authors:  Xianglan Sun; Ling Gao; Hung-Yu Chien; Wan-Chun Li; Jiajun Zhao
Journal:  J Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 5.098

3.  New member of the Snf1/AMPK kinase family, Melk, is expressed in the mouse egg and preimplantation embryo.

Authors:  B S Heyer; J Warsowe; D Solter; B B Knowles; S L Ackerman
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.609

4.  MELK expression in ovarian cancer correlates with poor outcome and its inhibition by OTSSP167 abrogates proliferation and viability of ovarian cancer cells.

Authors:  Reto S Kohler; Henriette Kettelhack; Alexandra M Knipprath-Mészaros; André Fedier; Andreas Schoetzau; Francis Jacob; Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 5.  Maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase: key kinase for stem cell phenotype in glioma and other cancers.

Authors:  Ranjit Ganguly; Christopher S Hong; Luke G F Smith; Harley I Kornblum; Ichiro Nakano
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 6.261

6.  Identification of novel kinase targets for the treatment of estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Corey Speers; Anna Tsimelzon; Krystal Sexton; Ashley M Herrick; Carolina Gutierrez; Aedin Culhane; John Quackenbush; Susan Hilsenbeck; Jenny Chang; Powel Brown
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  MELK: a potential novel therapeutic target for TNBC and other aggressive malignancies.

Authors:  Mary Kathryn Pitner; Juliana M Taliaferro; Kevin N Dalby; Chandra Bartholomeusz
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Targets       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 6.902

8.  MELK-a conserved kinase: functions, signaling, cancer, and controversy.

Authors:  Ranjit Ganguly; Ahmed Mohyeldin; Jordyn Thiel; Harley I Kornblum; Monique Beullens; Ichiro Nakano
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2015-03-07

9.  Dysregulated expression of Fau and MELK is associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer.

Authors:  Mark R Pickard; Andrew R Green; Ian O Ellis; Carlos Caldas; Vanessa L Hedge; Mirna Mourtada-Maarabouni; Gwyn T Williams
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase serves as a poor prognosis marker and therapeutic target in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Shen Li; Ziyu Li; Ting Guo; Xiao-Fang Xing; Xiaojing Cheng; Hong Du; Xian-Zi Wen; Jia-Fu Ji
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-02-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.