Literature DB >> 33386289

Holmium Laser En-bloc Resection Versus Conventional Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors for Treatment of Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Abdelwahab Hashem1, Ahmed Mosbah1, Nasr A El-Tabey1, Mahmoud Laymon1, El-Houssieny Ibrahiem1, Mohamed Abd Elhamid1, Ahmed M Elshal2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: En-bloc resection of bladder tumors achieves complete tumor removal, improves the quality of resection, decreases perioperative complication, and potentially improves recurrence rates.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of holmium laser en-bloc resection (HolERBT) versus conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumor (cTURBT). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Between September 2015 and September 2018, 100 patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer were randomly allocated to cTURBT or HolERBT. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint was detection of residual tumor in reTURBT specimens at 4 wk after the primary resection. Operative parameters, specimen quality, perioperative complications, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared. Independent sample t tests, χ2 tests, and Kaplan-Meier curves were used, as appropriate. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The patient and tumor baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. Residual tumors were detected in 7% and 27.7% of cases after HolERBT and cTURBT, respectively (p=0.01). Detrusor muscle was sampled in 98% of HolERBT and 62% of cTURBT cases (p<0.001). Lamina propria invasion substaging was feasible in only 68.2% of HolERBT and 18.4% of cTURBT cases (p<0.001). Following HolERBT, catheterization time (p<0.001) and hospital stay (p=0.001) were shorter when compared to cTURBT. Immediate postoperative instillation of chemotherapy in indicated cases was feasible for 100% of the HolERBT group and 91.5% of the cTURBT group (p=0.04). After follow-up of 20 ± 9.9 mo (13-36), RFS was 31.76 mo (95% confidence interval [CI] 28.67-34.86) in the HolERBT group and 28.25 mo (95% CI 24.87-31.64) in the cTURBT group (hazard ratio 0.43, 95% CI 0.17-1.1; p=0.07). However, this study was not powered to detect a difference in RFS.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to cTURBT, HolERBT is a safer procedure for bladder tumor resection. It fulfills the oncological criteria of optimized resection with less residual tumor and better specimen quality. PATIENT
SUMMARY: En-bloc resection of bladder cancer tumors using a holmium laser is safer than the conventional technique. It has the advantages of less residual tumor and better specimen quality, with a similar tumor recurrence rate. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02555163.
Copyright © 2020 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder tumor; Laser; Non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer; Resection; Transurethral resection of bladder tumor

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33386289     DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol Focus        ISSN: 2405-4569


  8 in total

1.  How do endoscopic bladder tumor resection techniques affect pathology practice? EAU Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) and Uropathology (ESUP) survey.

Authors:  Selcuk Guven; Maurizio Colecchia; Pembe Oltulu; Giulia Bonfante; Dmitry Enikeev; Hasan Esen; Thomas Herrmann; Lukas Lusuardi; Salvatore Micali; Bashkar Somani; Andreas Skolarikos; Alberto Breda; Evangelos Liatsikos; Joan Palou Redorta; Ali Serdar Gozen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  En-bloc Laser Resection of Bladder Tumors: Where Are We Now?

Authors:  Massimiliano Creta; Giuseppe Celentano; Gianluigi Califano; Roberto La Rocca; Nicola Longo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Energy source comparison in en-bloc resection of bladder tumors: subanalysis of a single-center prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Pietro Diana; Andrea Gallioli; Matteo Fontana; Angelo Territo; Alejandra Bravo; Alberto Piana; Michael Baboudjian; Pavel Gavrilov; Óscar Rodriguez-Faba; Josep Maria Gaya; Ferran Algaba; Joan Palou; Alberto Breda
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 4.  En bloc transurethral resection of bladder tumors: A review of current techniques.

Authors:  Stefanie M Croghan; Niall Compton; Rustom P Manecksha; Ivor M Cullen; Pádraig J Daly
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.052

5.  A prospective trial investigating the role of Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D in diagnosis and prognosis of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdelgawad; Abdelwahab Hashem; Ahmed Mosbah; Laila A Eissa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 6.  A Systematic Review on the Role of Repeat Transurethral Resection after Initial en Bloc Resection for Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Henglong Hu; Mengqi Zhou; Binrui Yang; Shiwei Zhou; Zheng Liu; Jiaqiao Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  The Safety and Efficacy of Vela Laser En-Bloc Endoscopic Resection versus Conventional Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor-A Single Center Experience.

Authors:  Che-Wei Chang; Tsz-Yi Tang; Jiun-Hung Geng; Jhen-Hao Jhan; Hsun-Shuan Wang; Jung-Tsung Shen; Yung-Chin Lee
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 8.  A Systematic Review of Thulium Fiber Laser: Applications and Advantages of Laser Technology in the Field of Urology.

Authors:  Patrick Rice; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2021-07-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.