Literature DB >> 33385265

Patterns of treatment and outcome of ductal carcinoma in situ in the Netherlands.

Jacky D Luiten1,2, Ernest J T Luiten3, Maurice J C van der Sangen4, Willem Vreuls5, Lucien E M Duijm6,7, Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen8,9, Adri C Voogd10,11.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To spare DCIS patients from overtreatment, treatment de-escalated over the years. This study evaluates the influence of these developments on the patterns of care in the treatment of DCIS with particular interest in the use of breast conserving surgery (BCS), radiotherapy following BCS and the use and type of axillary staging.
METHODS: In this large population-based cohort study all women, aged 50-74 years diagnosed with DCIS from January 1989 until January 2019, were analyzed per two-year cohort.
RESULTS: A total of 30,417 women were diagnosed with DCIS. The proportion of patients undergoing BCS increased from 47.7% in 1995-1996 to 72.7% in 2017-2018 (p < 0.001). Adjuvant radiotherapy following BCS increased from 28.9% (1995-1996) to 89.6% (2011-2012) and subsequently decreased to 74.9% (2017-2018; p < 0.001). Since its introduction, the use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) increased to 63.1% in 2013-2014 and subsequently decreased to 52.8% in 2017-2018 (p < 0.001). Axillary surgery is already omitted in 55.8% of the patients undergoing BCS nowadays. The five-year invasive relapse-free survival (iRFS) for BCS with adjuvant radiotherapy in the period 1989-2010, was 98.7% [CI 98.4% - 99.0%], compared to 95.0% [CI 94.1% -95.8%] for BCS only (p < 0.001). In 2011-2018, this was 99.3% [CI 99.1% - 99.5%] and 98.8% [CI 98.2% - 99.4%] respectively (p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a shift toward less extensive treatment. DCIS is increasingly treated with BCS and less often followed by additional radiotherapy. The absence of radiotherapy still results in excellent iRFS. Axillary surgery is increasingly omitted in DCIS patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer screening; Diagnostics; Ductal carcinoma in situ; Treatment

Year:  2021        PMID: 33385265     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-06055-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  37 in total

1.  Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  F Cardoso; S Kyriakides; S Ohno; F Penault-Llorca; P Poortmans; I T Rubio; S Zackrisson; E Senkus
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  A comparison study of image features between FFDM and film mammogram images.

Authors:  Hao Jing; Yongyi Yang; Miles N Wernick; Laura M Yarusso; Robert M Nishikawa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Breast microcalcifications: the lesions in anatomical pathology.

Authors:  P Henrot; A Leroux; C Barlier; P Génin
Journal:  Diagn Interv Imaging       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 4.026

4.  Breast-conserving treatment with or without radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma In Situ: 15-year recurrence rates and outcome after a recurrence, from the EORTC 10853 randomized phase III trial.

Authors:  Mila Donker; Saskia Litière; Gustavo Werutsky; Jean-Pierre Julien; Ian S Fentiman; Roberto Agresti; Philippe Rouanet; Christine Tunon de Lara; Harry Bartelink; Nicole Duez; Emiel J T Rutgers; Nina Bijker
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence.

Authors:  Archie Bleyer; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Absolute risk reductions for local recurrence after postoperative radiotherapy after sector resection for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  Lars Holmberg; Hans Garmo; Bengt Granstrand; Anita Ringberg; Lars-Gunnar Arnesson; Kerstin Sandelin; Per Karlsson; Harald Anderson; Stefan Emdin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer: estimates of overdiagnosis from two trials of mammographic screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Stephen W Duffy; Olorunsola Agbaje; Laszlo Tabar; Bedrich Vitak; Nils Bjurstam; Lena Björneld; Jonathan P Myles; Jane Warwick
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  The distribution of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) grade in 4232 women and its impact on overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  P A van Luijt; E A M Heijnsdijk; J Fracheboud; L I H Overbeek; M J M Broeders; J Wesseling; G J den Heeten; H J de Koning
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Overestimating Overdiagnosis in Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Alan Hollingsworth
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-01-09

10.  Subsequent risk of ipsilateral and contralateral invasive breast cancer after treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: incidence and the effect of radiotherapy in a population-based cohort of 10,090 women.

Authors:  Lotte E Elshof; Michael Schaapveld; Marjanka K Schmidt; Emiel J Rutgers; Flora E van Leeuwen; Jelle Wesseling
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.