| Literature DB >> 33385117 |
Hongxin Tan1,2, Xin Zhang3, Zhan Li1,3, Qing Liang1, Jinsheng Wu4, Yanli Yuan4, Shiwei Cao5, Jia Chen1, Juewen Liu6, Hongdeng Qiu1,2,7.
Abstract
Rare earth separation is still a major challenge in membrane science. Nitrogen-doped nanoporousEntities:
Keywords: Chemical Synthesis; Porous Material; Separation Science
Year: 2020 PMID: 33385117 PMCID: PMC7772569 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101920
Source DB: PubMed Journal: iScience ISSN: 2589-0042
Scheme 1Synthesis of NDNG through multiple confinement strategy and then NDNG membrane was prepared for rare earth elements separation
Figure 1Fabricating mechanism of Zn-hydrotalcite/Phe/GO composites with sandwich structure
(A) XRD patterns of GO and GO composites with filter paper. The 2θ range for the (001) peak of the GO is highlighted in the dashed box.
(B) AFM images of GO nanosheet and GO composites samples. Scale bars are all 100 nm.
(C) XRD patterns of the composites Zn(NO3)2/Phe/GO at concentrations of Zn(NO3)2 = 50 g/L, 100 g/L, 150 g/L, 200 g/L, 300 g/L, 400 g/L, 450 g/L and 500 g/L (1–8), respectively. Insert: The X axis expansions in the 6–15° 2θ diffraction angle regions in the dashed box (5–8).
(D) TEM images of the composites Zn(NO3)2/Phe/GO at concentrations of Zn(NO3)2 = 200 g/L, 400 g/L, and 500 g/L from left to right, respectively.
(E) Schematic showing the formation of sandwich composites of Zn-hydrotalcite/Phe/GO.
Figure 2TEM and SEM images of NDNG
(A–J) TEM (A–E) and SEM (F–J) images of various NDNG prepared by different concentration of Zn(NO3)2 and Phe. (A, F) NDNG-1 (Zn(NO3)2: 200 g/L; Phe: 15 g/L). (B, G) NDNG-2 (Zn(NO3)2: 400 g/L; Phe: 15 g/L). (C, H) NDNG-3 (Zn(NO3)2: 500 g/L; Phe: 15 g/L). (D, I) NDNG-4 (Zn(NO3)2: 500 g/L; Phe: 10 g/L). (E, J) NDNG-5 (Zn(NO3)2: 500 g/L; Phe: 5 g/L).
(K) TEM image of NDNG-3 combined with EDS mapping in the same area and relative intensities of C (red), O (yellow), and N (orange) elements.
Figure 3XPS spectrum of NDNG
(A) Survey spectrum of NDNG.
(B–F) Typical high-resolution XPS N 1s spectra of NDNG.
(G) Schematic representation showing the selectivity for planar N during NDNG synthesis.
Figure 4Permeation and separation of REEs through NDNG membranes
(A) Effect of pH on the separation for NDNG-1 membrane. The pH of feed solution of REEs (5 mM) was adjusted to 3.0. The pH of driven solution was adjusted by diluted NH4OH or HNO3 solution. The thickness of the membranes is 105 μm.
(B) Permeation flux of REEs as a function of the NDNG-1 membrane thickness. The feed solution has a concentration of 5 mM for all elements at a pH of 3.0; The driven solution is dilute nitric acid at a pH of 2.0.
(C and D) Permeance with different NDNG membranes (NDNG-1, NDNG-2, NDNG-3, NDNG-4, and NDNG-5) for the REEs. The feed solution has a concentration of 5 mM for all elements at a pH of 3.0; The driven solution is dilute nitric acid at a pH of 2.0. The thickness of the membranes is 105 μm.
Figure 5Theoretical computations of the interaction energy between REEs and NDNG
(A) The most stable optimized geometries and the corresponding electrostatic potential surfaces of N6 and N5 on the sheets of NDNG and nitrate of Sc, La, Eu. The purple region represents negative ESP, while the green region represents positive ESP.
(B) Comparison of the interaction energies of the REEs (Sc, La, Eu) with N6 and N5.
(C) Upper panel: the most stable optimized geometries and the corresponding electrostatic potential surfaces of the complexes of REEs with N6 and N5 along with their interaction energies, respectively, where the cations are Sc3+, La3+, and Eu3+. Lower panel: corresponding color-filled maps of electron location function.