Literature DB >> 33384980

The Response of Living Organisms to Low Radiation Environment and Its Implications in Radiation Protection.

Mauro Belli1, Luca Indovina2.   

Abstract

Life has evolved on Earth for about 4 billion years in the presence of the natural background of ionizing radiation. It is extremely likely that it contributed, and still contributes, to shaping present form of life. Today the natural background radiation is extremely small (few mSv/y), however it may be significant enough for living organisms to respond to it, perhaps keeping memory of this exposure. A better understanding of this response is relevant not only for improving our knowledge on life evolution, but also for assessing the robustness of the present radiation protection system at low doses, such as those typically encountered in everyday life. Given the large uncertainties in epidemiological data below 100 mSv, quantitative evaluation of these health risk is currently obtained with the aid of radiobiological models. These predict a health detriment, caused by radiation-induced genetic mutations, linearly related to the dose. However a number of studies challenged this paradigm by demonstrating the occurrence of non-linear responses at low doses, and of radioinduced epigenetic effects, i.e., heritable changes in genes expression not related to changes in DNA sequence. This review is focused on the role that epigenetic mechanisms, besides the genetic ones, can have in the responses to low dose and protracted exposures, particularly to natural background radiation. Many lines of evidence show that epigenetic modifications are involved in non-linear responses relevant to low doses, such as non-targeted effects and adaptive response, and that genetic and epigenetic effects share, in part, a common origin: the reactive oxygen species generated by ionizing radiation. Cell response to low doses of ionizing radiation appears more complex than that assumed for radiation protection purposes and that it is not always detrimental. Experiments conducted in underground laboratories with very low background radiation have even suggested positive effects of this background. Studying the changes occurring in various living organisms at reduced radiation background, besides giving information on the life evolution, have opened a new avenue to answer whether low doses are detrimental or beneficial, and to understand the relevance of radiobiological results to radiation protection.
Copyright © 2020 Belli and Indovina.

Entities:  

Keywords:  background radiation; epigenetics (MeSH); ionizing radiation; low dose effects of radiation; radiation protection; radiobiology; underground experiments

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33384980      PMCID: PMC7770185          DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.601711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Public Health        ISSN: 2296-2565


  147 in total

1.  Long-term immune and cytogenetic effects of high level natural radiation on Ramsar inhabitants in Iran.

Authors:  M Ghiassi-Nejad; F Zakeri; R Gh Assaei; A Kariminia
Journal:  J Environ Radioact       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.674

Review 2.  A decade of exploring the cancer epigenome - biological and translational implications.

Authors:  Stephen B Baylin; Peter A Jones
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  No evidence for a low linear energy transfer adaptive response in irradiated RKO cells.

Authors:  M B Sowa; W Goetz; J E Baulch; A J Lewis; W F Morgan
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 0.972

4.  Computational modelling of low-energy electron-induced DNA damage by early physical and chemical events.

Authors:  H Nikjoo; P O'Neill; D T Goodhead; M Terrissol
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.694

Review 5.  Altered DNA methylation and genome instability: a new pathway to cancer?

Authors:  P A Jones; M L Gonzalgo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-03-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Human in vivo dose-response to controlled, low-dose low linear energy transfer ionizing radiation exposure.

Authors:  Zelanna Goldberg; David M Rocke; Chad Schwietert; Susanne R Berglund; Alison Santana; Angela Jones; Jörg Lehmann; Robin Stern; Ruixiao Lu; Christine Hartmann Siantar
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Effects of ionizing radiation on DNA methylation: from experimental biology to clinical applications.

Authors:  Isabelle R Miousse; Kristy R Kutanzi; Igor Koturbash
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 2.694

8.  High LET (56)Fe ion irradiation induces tissue-specific changes in DNA methylation in the mouse.

Authors:  Florence Lima; Dacheng Ding; Wilfried Goetz; Austin J Yang; Janet E Baulch
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2013-11-30       Impact factor: 3.216

9.  Radiation-induced lung adenocarcinoma is associated with increased frequency of genes inactivated by promoter hypermethylation.

Authors:  Christopher M Lyon; Donna M Klinge; Kieu C Liechty; Frederick D Gentry; Thomas H March; Terri Kang; Frank D Gilliland; Galina Adamova; Galina Rusinova; Vitaliy Telnov; Steven A Belinsky
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Long non-coding RNA PARTICLE bridges histone and DNA methylation.

Authors:  Valerie Bríd O'Leary; Sarah Hain; Doris Maugg; Jan Smida; Omid Azimzadeh; Soile Tapio; Saak Victor Ovsepian; Michael John Atkinson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Role of Mitochondria in Radiation Responses: Epigenetic, Metabolic, and Signaling Impacts.

Authors:  Dietrich Averbeck; Claire Rodriguez-Lafrasse
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 2.  Photobiology of lipofuscin granules in the retinal pigment epithelium cells of the eye: norm, pathology, age.

Authors:  T B Feldman; A E Dontsov; M A Yakovleva; M A Ostrovsky
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2022-08-08

3.  Reduced Environmental Dose Rates Are Responsible for the Increased Susceptibility to Radiation-Induced DNA Damage in Larval Neuroblasts of Drosophila Grown inside the LNGS Underground Laboratory.

Authors:  Antonella Porrazzo; Giuseppe Esposito; Daniela Grifoni; Giovanni Cenci; Patrizia Morciano; Maria Antonella Tabocchini
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 6.208

4.  Differential molecular response in mice and human thymocytes exposed to a combined-dose radiation regime.

Authors:  Pilar López-Nieva; Iria González-Vasconcellos; Laura González-Sánchez; María A Cobos-Fernández; Sara Ruiz-García; Raúl Sánchez Pérez; Ángel Aroca; José Fernández-Piqueras; Javier Santos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Unraveling Mitochondrial Determinants of Tumor Response to Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Mattia Zaffaroni; Maria Giulia Vincini; Giulia Corrao; Giulia Marvaso; Matteo Pepa; Giuseppe Viglietto; Nicola Amodio; Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 6.208

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.