Literature DB >> 33384930

Mycobacterium mucogenicum bacteremia in an immunocompetent host: A case report and concise review.

N Beydoun1, Z Wiley2, N Rouphael2,3.   

Abstract

Rapidly growing mycobacterium (RGM) bloodstream infections (BSI) have been described in the literature mostly in immunocompromised patients such as those with malignancies. Here, we describe a case of a RGM, Mycobacterium mucogenicum, bloodstream infection in an immunocompetent host who was receiving antibiotics via a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC).
© 2020 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bloodstream infection; Mycobacterium mucogenicum; Peripherally inserted central catheter; Rapidly growing mycobacterium

Year:  2020        PMID: 33384930      PMCID: PMC7770553          DOI: 10.1016/j.idcr.2020.e01032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IDCases        ISSN: 2214-2509


Introduction

Around 800,000 cases of central venous catheter (CVC) related BSI are diagnosed in the United States each year in intensive care setting [1]. Depending on the type of catheter, method of insertion and duration of catheter placement, the risk of BSI varies [2]. The most commonly isolated microorganisms that cause Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections (CRBSI) are: coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus aureus, Candida species, and enteric gram-negative rods [2]. Rarely, acid-fast bacilli (AFB) can be a cause of BSI, mostly in immunocompromised patients with CVCs. Therefore, it is important to recognize these infections promptly in order to administer the appropriate antibiotic regimen.

Case presentation

A 54-year-old Caucasian woman presented with fever and body aches. Two months earlier, she had undergone anterior cervical discectomy and fusion of C6-C7 for cervical spondylosis and myelopathy, after which she had wound dehiscence and infection with Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) proven by culture. She was undergoing treatment with daptomycin intravenously, after intolerance of her initial regimen of vancomycin and rifampin. Her medical history included breast cancer (bilateral mastectomy and chemotherapy 8 years prior) and prior cholecystectomy and appendectomy. Family and social histories were unremarkable. On physical examination, vital signs were stable except for a temperature of 38.9 °C. Her surgical wound site was completely healed. The peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) site was mildly tender without warmth, swelling, or discharge. Laboratory results included: white blood cells (WBCs) count of 13,100/mcL (normal range 4,000–10,000/mcL), erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 55 mm/h (reference high >30 mm/h), C-reactive protein (CRP) of 52 mg/L (reference high >10 mg/L). Her HIV test was negative. Nine out of nine blood cultures were positive for AFB. The catheter was removed and catheter tip culture grew more than 15 colonies of AFB. Upon further analysis and speciation, culture results were positive for Mycobacterium mucogenicum (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Abundant growth of Mycobacterium mucogenicum on Middlebrook 7H11 Agar with typical mucoid appearance of the colonies.

Abundant growth of Mycobacterium mucogenicum on Middlebrook 7H11 Agar with typical mucoid appearance of the colonies. The isolated M. mucogenicum was susceptible to amikacin, cefoxitin, ciprofloxacin, clarithromycin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Intermediate resistance was noted for linezolid, and the isolate was resistant to doxycycline. A four week course of meropenem, azithromycin and ciprofloxacin was initiated and repeat blood cultures drawn on the third day of therapy were negative. A week into therapy, a new PICC line was placed, before discharge. She also completed a ten week course of daptomycin for her MRSA wound infection. Repeat MRI and WBC scan showed no evidence of infection and her CRP decreased to 10 mg/L.

Discussion

With the increase of immunocompromising conditions, the prevalence of rapidly growing mycobacterium (RGM) infections has been rising [3]. This rise is also partly due to improved laboratory methodologies in the detection and rapid isolation of RGM species [4]. Some of the groups included under RGM are Mycobacterium fortuitum, Mycobacterium mucogenicum, Mycobacterium neoaurum, Mycobacterium abscessus, Mycobacterium cosmeticum, Mycobacterium Smegmatis, and Mycobacterium phlei. M. mucogenicum’s name is derived from the mucoid-like appearance of the isolates [5]. The mucoid surface helps these organisms with biofilm formation, making it an important culprit among catheter-related infections. M. mucogenicum is ubiquitous in the environment and can be present in both public and hospital water supplies. Multiple outbreaks in patients with CVCs have been traced back to water sources contaminated with M. mucogenicum. This happens mostly while flushing the catheter with tap water or contamination of the CVC while bathing [5,6]. In our review of the literature, we found 20 articles on M. mucogenicum BSI, with detailed clinical and microbiological information available on a total of 172 patients (Table 1).
Table 1

Review of the literature on Mycobacterium mucogenicum bloodstream infections.

ReferenceYearTotal # of patients# of patients with M. mucogenicumSex/AgeUnderlying disease/ comorbidityPresence of CVCSourceTreatmentRemoval of CVCOutcome
[3]201632944.4% M/55.9 (mean)Malignancy (5) Chronic GI pathology (2) Autoimmune disease (1)Yes (88.9 %)Not specifiedNot specifiedNot specifiedFavorable (62.5 %)
[6]201711M/34ESRD on home HDYesTap water supplyMXF + CLR for 6 weeksYesFavorable
[7]20131164557.8% M/52 (median)MalignancyYes (95.7 %)Not specifiedMost frequently: ML + FQ (60 %)Yes (78.4 %)Resolved (79.3 %)
[8]200466N/A (adults and pediatrics patients)BMT or HSCT (5) Malignancy (1)Yes (100 %)Tap water supplyNot specifiedNot specifiedNot specified
[9]2016393959% M/52 (median)SCT MalignancyYes (84.6 %)Not specified>1 ABx (most frequently: IV AMK + PO CLR) Median = 42 daysYes (100 %)Favorable
[10]20155450 % M/42.25 (mean)MalignancyYes (100 %)Tap water supplyNo ABx Observation onlyYes (100 %)Favorable
[11]20124425 % M/26.75 (mean)Sickle-cell diseaseYes (100 %)Tap water supplyCombination >1 ABxYes (100 %)Favorable
[12]20115425 % M/47.4 (mean)MalignancyYes (100 %)Tap water supplyCombination >1 ABxYes (100 %)Favorable (75 %) Death (25 %, post-transplant complications unrelated to infection)
[13]20118862.5 % M/6.9 (mean)Malignancy (7) Thalassemia major (1)Yes (100 %)Not specifiedNo ABx (50 %) AMK (25 %, for febrile neutropenia) IPM followed by CIP for 6 weeks (25 %)Yes (100 %)Favorable (100 %)
[14]20085580 % M/9.1 (mean)MalignancyYes (100 %)Tap water supply (exposure during bathing)CLR (20 %) CLR + CIP (40 %) Amikacin (20 %)Yes (80 %)Favorable (80 %) Death (20 %, died before culture results were available)
[15]20086250 % M/37.5 (mean)MalignancyYes (100 %)Not specifiedAMK + CLR for 8 weeks (50 %) Multiple combinations for 24 weeks (50 %)Yes (100 %)Favorable (100 %)
[16]199811M/47CirrhosisYesUncertainIPM + AMKNot specifiedDefervesced but died of other causes
[17]20071152866% M/48.4 (mean)MalignancyYes (100 %)Not specifiedCombination >1 ABxYes (100 %)Favorable (100 %)
[18]2000402N/AHSCTYes (100 %)Not specifiedIV ABx for 2−4 weeks followed by PO ABx for 4−6 weeks (100%)Not specifiedFavorable (100%)
[19]2015252100 % F/9 (mean)MalignancyYes (100 %)Not specifiedCLR + IPM for 2 weeks followed by CLR for 22 weeks (50 %) CLR for 8 weeks (50 %)Yes (100 %)Favorable (100 %)
[20]2010393N/A (adults and pediatrics patients)Malignancy in majorityNot specifiedNot specifiedNot specifiedNot specifiedNot specified
[21]200413250 % M/9 (mean)MalignancyYes (100 %)Not specifiedNo ABx (50 %) CLR + unspecified agent (50 %)Yes (100 %)Favorable (100 %)
[22]200611F/6MDS s/p cord blood transplantYesTap water supply (flushed her CVC)IV AMK + PO CIP + PO CLRYesFavorable
[23]20085540 % M/67 (median)MalignancyYes (100 %)Tap water supplyNot specifiedYes (100 %)Not specified
[24]200711M/16Malignancy (ALL)YesPossible exposure of line to tap water supply during bathingMRM (kept Hickman) Then catheter removed and MRM + TEC + ACV due to relapseYesFavorable

M=Male; N/A=Not applicable; GI=Gastrointestinal; ESRD=End stage renal disease; SCT=Stem cell transplant; BMT=Bone marrow transplant; HSCT=Hematopoietic stem cell transplant; MDS=Myelodysplasia syndrome; ALL=Acute lymphocytic leukemia; CVC=Central venous catheter; ABx=Antibiotics; PO=Orally; IV=Intravenous; MFX=Moxifloxacin; CLR=Clarithromycin; ML=Macrolide; FQ=Fluoroquinolone; AMK=Amikacin; IPM=Imipenem; CIP=Ciprofloxacin; MRM=Meropenem; TEC=Teicoplanin; ACV=Acyclovir.

Review of the literature on Mycobacterium mucogenicum bloodstream infections. M=Male; N/A=Not applicable; GI=Gastrointestinal; ESRD=End stage renal disease; SCT=Stem cell transplant; BMT=Bone marrow transplant; HSCT=Hematopoietic stem cell transplant; MDS=Myelodysplasia syndrome; ALL=Acute lymphocytic leukemia; CVC=Central venous catheter; ABx=Antibiotics; PO=Orally; IV=Intravenous; MFX=Moxifloxacin; CLR=Clarithromycin; ML=Macrolide; FQ=Fluoroquinolone; AMK=Amikacin; IPM=Imipenem; CIP=Ciprofloxacin; MRM=Meropenem; TEC=Teicoplanin; ACV=Acyclovir. Among the rapidly growing mycobacteria, M. mucogenicum was found to be the most common cause of BSI. The majority of M. mucogenicum BSI cases reported in the literature were seen in adult and pediatric patients with malignancies. Other underlying diseases included end stage renal disease, cirrhosis, sickle cell disease, thalassemia major, chronic gastrointestinal pathology and autoimmune diseases. The most important risk factor was the presence of CVCs, on which these organisms are capable of biofilm formation [4]. Management of these infections includes removal of the catheter and administration of appropriate antibiotics. Removal of the catheter has been shown to have favorable outcomes and leads to a decrease in the rate of relapse of M. mucogenicum bacteremia [7]. There are no treatment guidelines outlining the optimal choice of antibiotics or length of treatment necessary for the management of these infections; it is often based on expert opinion. RGM are inherently resistant to first-line antituberculous drugs such as isoniazid, rifampin, and pyrazinamide [4]. Fortunately, M. mucogenicum is considered to be one of the most susceptible strains amongst RGM, and susceptibility testing should be performed for the following antibiotics: amikacin, tobramycin, clarithromycin, doxycycline, minocycline, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, linezolid, and cefoxitin [25]. Several studies have shown good outcomes with the use of two or more antibiotics, for a period of around 4 weeks, owed to the highly susceptible nature of the strain to multiple antibiotics. A study by El Helou et al. found that regimens that included Amikacin were associated with lower relapse and better outcomes [7], suggesting its use as initial empiric treatment of RGM bacteremia. Rodriguez-Coste et al. recommend using clarithromycin, imipenem and amikacin as broad empiric therapy while waiting for sensitivity testing, since this combination will provide at least two active agents [3]. Upon review of the literature, the most frequently used combination of antibiotics was a macrolide plus a quinolone, commonly clarithromycin and ciprofloxacin, which generally lead to good outcomes. The challenge of identifying M. mucogenicum as a cause of bacteremia is its slow growth as compared to other microorganisms responsible for catheter related BSI, such as Staphylococcus. RGM can take up to 7 days to grow on culture media, while blood cultures are usually incubated for only 5 days. The other challenge is that this organism is often thought of as affecting only the immunocompromised, however, it can also cause bacteremia in immunocompetent hosts, such as our patient. M. mucogenicum should be considered in any patient with a catheter in place and managed accordingly.

Author statement

Dr. Nour Beydoun contributed to the conception and design of the work, literature review, acquisition on data, analysis of data, drafting and revising the work. Dr. Nadine Rouphael contributed to the conception and design of the work, planning, interpretation of data, revising the work critically for important intellectual content. Dr. Zanthia Wiley contributed to the design of the work, analysis of data, and critically revising the work for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final version published. All authors are in agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Funding

The present study had no sources of funding or sponsorships. It was carried out with own resources of the authors.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal on request.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors report no declarations of interest.
  24 in total

1.  Prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections.

Authors:  L A Mermel
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-03-07       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Nontuberculous mycobacterial infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: characteristics of respiratory and catheter-related infections.

Authors:  J M Gaviria; P J Garcia; S M Garrido; L Corey; M Boeckh
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Mycobacterium mucogenicum from the Hickman line of an immunocompromised patient.

Authors:  C Marshall; J Samuel; A Galloway; S Pedler
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Rapidly growing mycobacteria: clinical and microbiologic studies of 115 cases.

Authors:  Xiang Y Han; Indra Dé; Kalen L Jacobson
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Case of Mycobacterium mucogenicum in a home hemodialysis patient.

Authors:  Miten J Dhruve; Paul E Bunce; Celine D'Gama; Christopher T Chan
Journal:  Hemodial Int       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 1.812

6.  Management of rapidly growing mycobacterial bacteremia in cancer patients.

Authors:  Gilbert El Helou; Ray Hachem; George M Viola; Aline El Zakhem; Anne-Marie Chaftari; Ying Jiang; Jeffrey Tarrand; Issam I Raad
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 7.  Rapidly growing mycobacterial bloodstream infections.

Authors:  Gilbert El Helou; George M Viola; Ray Hachem; Xiang Y Han; Issam I Raad
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 25.071

8.  Rapidly growing mycobacteria infection in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Gil Redelman-Sidi; Kent A Sepkowitz
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Epidemiology of Rapidly Growing Mycobacteria Bloodstream Infections.

Authors:  Michelle A Rodriguez-Coste; Ioana Chirca; Lisa L Steed; Cassandra D Salgado
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.378

Review 10.  Mycobacterium mucogenicum group infections: a review.

Authors:  T Adékambi
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.