| Literature DB >> 33384774 |
Yen-Yun Wang1,2, Wen-Chen Wang1,3,4, Chiang-Wei Su5, Ching-Wei Hsu5, Shyng-Shiou Yuan2,6,7,8, Yuk-Kwan Chen1,3,4.
Abstract
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND/Entities:
Keywords: Oral potentially malignant disorders; Oral squamous cell carcinoma; SPRY1
Year: 2020 PMID: 33384774 PMCID: PMC7770302 DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.07.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Dent Sci ISSN: 1991-7902 Impact factor: 2.080
Figure 1Immunohistochemical staining of SPRY1 protein in human oral squamous cell carcinoma and normal oral mucosa. Representative strong immunohistochemical staining of SPRY1 protein in human oral squamous cell carcinoma (A, ×100) and weak staining of SPRY1 protein in normal oral mucosa (B, ×100).
Figure 2Western blot analyses: SPRY1 protein expression in human oral cancer cell lines as compared with a primary culture of normal oral mucosa (HOK). Upregulation of SPRY1 protein expression in human oral cancer cell lines (A, Ca922; B, OCEM1; C, SAS) as compared with a HOK. Results were quantified using densitometric analysis, normalized to the level of GAPDH, and expressed as a fold change relative to the normal oral mucosa. Bars represent means ± standard deviation of the mean (∗P < 0.05). A representative result of three independent experiments is shown.
Figure 3Western blot analyses: phosphor-ERK and total-ERK in human oral cancer cell lines as compared with a primary culture of normal oral mucosa (HOK). Upregulation of phosphor-ERK (normalized to total-ERK) in OECM1 and Ca922 cell lines as compared with HOK, and a slightly decreased expression in SAS as compared with HOK. Results were quantified using densitometric analysis, normalized to the level of β-actin, and expressed as a fold change relative to the normal oral mucosa. Bars represent means ± standard deviation of the mean (∗P < 0.05). A representative result of three independent experiments is shown.
Figure 4Immunohistochemical staining of SPRY1 protein in human oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) with and without malignant transformation (MT). Representative stronger immunohistochemical staining of SPRY1 protein in a human OPMD with MT (A, ×100) and weaker staining of SPRY1 protein in a human OPMD without MT (B, ×100).
Figure 5Western blot analyses: SPRY1 protein expression in human oral premalignant cell line DOK as compared with a primary culture of human normal oral mucosa (HOK) and with human oral cancer cell lines. Upregulation of SPRY1 protein expression was observed for DOK as compared with HOK (A). Upregulation of SPRY1 protein expression in human oral cancer cell lines Ca922 (B), OECM1 (C), and SAS (D) as compared with DOK. Results were quantified using densitometric analysis, normalized to the level of GAPDH, and expressed as a fold change relative to the normal oral mucosa (A) and to human oral cancer cell lines (B–D). Bars represent means ± standard deviation of the mean (∗P < 0.05). A representative result of three independent experiments is shown.
Statistical comparison of immunohistochemical expression of SPRY1 protein in human oral squamous cell carcinomas, including gender, oral risk factors and histopathological features.
| Number | Mean | Standard deviation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 84 | 4.32143 | 2.49897 | 0.0435 |
| Female | 6 | 2.16667 | 2.31667 | |
| No | 21 | 3.33333 | 2.05757 | 0.1137 |
| Yes | 67 | 4.31343 | 2.55965 | |
| No | 14 | 3.28571 | 2.16364 | 0.1921 |
| Yes | 74 | 4.22973 | 2.51324 | |
| No | 11 | 2.81818 | 1.77866 | 0.0704 |
| Yes | 77 | 4.25974 | 2.51523 | |
| T1 | 37 | 3.75676 | 2.47662 | 0.1893 |
| T2+T3+T4 | 53 | 4.4717 | 2.55406 | |
| Yes | 23 | 4.17391 | 1.99208 | 0.9933 |
| No | 67 | 4.1791 | 2.7076 | |
| I | 32 | 3.875 | 2.62433 | 0.5905 |
| II | 17 | 4.76471 | 2.63461 | |
| III | 10 | 4.7 | 1.94651 | |
| IV | 31 | 4 | 2.58199 | |