Literature DB >> 33384701

Phenolic Compound Induction in Plant-Microbe and Plant-Insect Interactions: A Meta-Analysis.

Christopher M Wallis1, Erin R-A Galarneau2.   

Abstract

Plants rely on a variety of ways to protect themselves from being fed upon, including de novo production of specific compounds such as those termed as phenolics. Phenolics are often described as important in plant health and numerous studies have concluded they increase as a result of insect feeding, pathogen infection, or beneficial microorganism colonization. However, there are some studies reaching differing conclusions. Therefore, meta-analyses were conducted to observe whether common trends in phenolic induction in plants can be made when they become hosts to insects or microorganisms. Four hypotheses were tested. The first was that total phenolics increase as a generic response, and meta-analyses confirmed that this occurs when plants are infested with insects or colonized by bacterial or fungal microorganisms, but not for oomycetes. The second hypothesis was that phenolic induction is different when a beneficial microorganism colonizes a plant vs. when a plant is infected by a pathogen. Beneficial bacteria, pathogenic bacteria, and beneficial fungi produced increased phenolic levels in plant hosts, but fungal pathogens did not. The third hypothesis was that insect feeding method on plant hosts determines if phenolics are induced. Chewing induced phenolics but piercing-sucking and wood-boring did not. Lastly, we used meta-analyses to determine if annual or perennials rely on phenolic induction in different amounts, and even though annuals had significantly increased phenolic levels but perennials did not, it was observed that phenolic induction was not statistically different when plant type was considered. These results demonstrate that phenolic induction is a common response in plant hosts exposed to feeding or colonization, with specific exceptions such a pathogenic fungi and piercing-sucking insects.
Copyright © 2020 Wallis and Galarneau.

Entities:  

Keywords:  induced systemic resistance; phenolics; plant breeding; plant defense responses; secondary metabolism; systemic acquired resistance

Year:  2020        PMID: 33384701      PMCID: PMC7769804          DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.580753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Plant Sci        ISSN: 1664-462X            Impact factor:   5.753


  46 in total

1.  Meta-analysis for evidence synthesis in plant pathology: an overview.

Authors:  L V Madden; P A Paul
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.025

2.  An ecological genomic approach challenging the paradigm of differential plant responses to specialist versus generalist insect herbivores.

Authors:  M Gabriela Bidart-Bouzat; Daniel Kliebenstein
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  Evolution of jasmonate and salicylate signal crosstalk.

Authors:  Jennifer S Thaler; Parris T Humphrey; Noah K Whiteman
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 18.313

4.  Effects of plant vascular architecture on aboveground-belowground-induced responses to foliar and root herbivores on Nicotiana tabacum.

Authors:  Ian Kaplan; Rayko Halitschke; André Kessler; Sandra Sardanelli; Robert F Denno
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Exogenous application of methyl jasmonate elicits defenses in Norway spruce (Picea abies) and reduces host colonization by the bark beetle Ips typographus.

Authors:  Nadir Erbilgin; Paal Krokene; Erik Christiansen; Gazmend Zeneli; Jonathan Gershenzon
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  An optimal defense strategy for phenolic glycoside production in Populus trichocarpa--isotope labeling demonstrates secondary metabolite production in growing leaves.

Authors:  Tara Joy Massad; Susan E Trumbore; Gantsetseg Ganbat; Michael Reichelt; Sybille Unsicker; Andreas Boeckler; Gerd Gleixner; Jonathan Gershenzon; Steffen Ruehlow
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 7.  How phloem-feeding insects face the challenge of phloem-located defenses.

Authors:  Torsten Will; Alexandra C U Furch; Matthias R Zimmermann
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Grapevine (Vitis spp.) rootstock stilbenoid associations with host resistance to and induction by root knot nematodes, Meloidogyne incognita.

Authors:  Christopher M Wallis
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2020-07-29

9.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Costs of defense and a test of the carbon-nutrient balance and growth-differentiation balance hypotheses for two co-occurring classes of plant defense.

Authors:  Tara Joy Massad; Lee A Dyer; Gerardo Vega C
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  10 in total

1.  Amino acid, sugar, phenolic, and terpenoid profiles are capable of distinguishing Citrus tristeza virus infection status in citrus cultivars: Grapefruit, lemon, mandarin, and sweet orange.

Authors:  Christopher M Wallis; Zachary Gorman; Rachel Rattner; Subhas Hajeri; Raymond Yokomi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Compensatory phenolic induction dynamics in aspen after aphid infestation.

Authors:  Rajarshi Kumar Gaur; Ilka Nacif de Abreu; Benedicte Riber Albrectsen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Effect of Methyl Jasmonate in Gene Expression, and in Hormonal and Phenolic Profiles of Holm Oak Embryogenic Lines Before and After Infection With Phytophthora cinnamomi.

Authors:  Marian Morcillo; Ester Sales; Elena Corredoira; María Teresa Martínez; Juan Segura; Isabel Arrillaga
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  Pattern Recognition Approach for the Screening of Potential Adulteration of Traditional and Bourbon Barrel-Aged Maple Syrups by Spectral Fingerprinting and Classical Methods.

Authors:  Kuanrong Zhu; Didem P Aykas; Luis E Rodriguez-Saona
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-07-25

Review 5.  Arbuscular mycorrhizal Fungi and Changes in Primary and Secondary Metabolites.

Authors:  Mostafa Amani Machiani; Abdollah Javanmard; Reyhaneh Habibi Machiani; Amir Sadeghpour
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-23

Review 6.  Plant Responses to Herbivory, Wounding, and Infection.

Authors:  Salma Mostafa; Yun Wang; Wen Zeng; Biao Jin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 7.  Salicylic Acid Biosynthesis and Metabolism: A Divergent Pathway for Plants and Bacteria.

Authors:  Awdhesh Kumar Mishra; Kwang-Hyun Baek
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-05-09

8.  Priming of Resistance-Related Phenolics: A Study of Plant-Associated Bacteria and Hymenoscyphus fraxineus.

Authors:  Greta Striganavičiūtė; Jonas Žiauka; Vaida Sirgedaitė-Šėžienė; Dorotėja Vaitiekūnaitė
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-12-02

9.  Screening coffee genotypes for brown eye spot resistance in Brazil.

Authors:  Juliana Barros Ramos; Mario Lucio Vilela de Resende; Deila Magna Dos Santos Botelho; Renata Cristina Martins Pereira; Tharyn Reichel; André Augusto Ferreira Balieiro; Gustavo Pucci Botega; Juliana Costa de Rezende Abrahão
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Chemical Gradients of Plant Substrates in an Atta texana Fungus Garden.

Authors:  Andrés Mauricio Caraballo-Rodríguez; Sara P Puckett; Kathleen E Kyle; Daniel Petras; Ricardo da Silva; Louis-Félix Nothias; Madeleine Ernst; Justin J J van der Hooft; Anupriya Tripathi; Mingxun Wang; Marcy J Balunas; Jonathan L Klassen; Pieter C Dorrestein
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 6.496

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.