Avoiding Diagnostic Lens Fogging During the COVID-19 Era.

Since the advent of COVID-19, the patient's use of a face mask hampers our visibility because there is a marked fogging in our view produced by the warm breath that escapes from the top of the patient's mask and lands on the cooler surface of the lens. This panorama is sometimes so frustrating that we have been forced to ask our patients to remove their facemasks while examined, increasing the risk of being infected. We consider it essential to share this small pearl technique that we can apply in order to avoid fogging during the examination; it is easy, and most importantly, without putting at risk the patient or doctor's health. In our opinion, this is the first material to propose this technique.

Commentary

This year humanity has to face an unprecedented situation; since the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic, life as we previously knew it had been drastically turned over. In medical practice, the interaction between patients and doctors has been physically and emotionally challenged due to the new demand of wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) by the medical staff and the patient.

We all know by now that the virus can be spread by coughing, sneezing, breathing, as well as talking, sending multiple micro-particles in the air. The concern of a direct ocular transmission mechanism has emerged, although the specific means involved in this process have not been fully understood. Like all viruses, SARS-CoV-2 needs an affinity tool that allows cellular interaction and gene cell incorporation. The angiotensin-converting-enzyme 2 receptor (ACE2) and its cell transmembrane protease, serine 2 (TMPRSS2), currently depict the primary roles aiming this process.1 ACE2 and TMPRSS2 are highly expressed and recognized in different ocular structures, including the conjunctiva, cornea, trabecular meshwork, and even the retina.2,3 Theoretically, this will allow the virus to adhere, prevail, and replicate, overstepping the ocular surface and disseminate systemically into the body.2 The dispersion of the virus in the tear film has also been considered another critical route for possible transmission, and albeit there is good evidence that shows the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in tears, it has been demonstrated that the virus can not be detected in the conjunctival sac without prior signs of conjunctivitis.4 However, in patients who initially displayed these signs, continuous presence and active replication of the pathogen have been observed, even in entirely asymptomatic subjects.2,4 Therefore, it becomes emphatic to properly use PPE’s armamentarium to avoid contact with contaminated droplets and bioaerosol emitted by patients who can reach our face and eyes. Findings continued to support the idea that masks, in general, are associated with a considerable reduction in risk of infection from SARS-CoV-2, and this reduction markedly increases with an appropriate distance of at least 1 meter.5 As ophthalmologists, we can hardly opt for the benefit of distance in our daily practice, and we are at high risk since getting really close to our patients during slit-lamp examinations.

Currently, recommendations are vague regarding how to approach different therapeutic and medical work-related situations. In this sense, the medical staff is often left behind and is forced to make decisions and face these responsibilities independently.6 The American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO), after the first peek of the pandemic, detailed recommendations on dealing with standard practice in the COVID-19 era, even then inviting ophthalmologists to “make individual decisions” regarding the use of PPE.7 Nevertheless, national and international ophthalmological guidelines and recommendations, as well as common sense, advocate using protective shields on the slit-lamp instruments and wearing a facemask during interaction with patients by both physician and patient.5,8,9

Although being mandatory and needed, the patient’s use of a facemask hampers the visibility of the retina. While we are examining the patient with our indirect non-contact or contact direct lens, there is a marked fogging in our view produced by the warm breath that escapes from the top of the patient’s mask and lands on the cooler surface of the diagnostic lens (Figure 1). At some point, this limitation may trigger the inappropriate use of protection, removing the patient’s facemask during the examination with an increased risk of contagion.

Figure 1

Avoiding lens fogging during examination. (A) While using a non-contact indirect lens for fundoscopic examination, warm breath reaches the lens’s cold surface with consequent fogging. (B) we hold the lens between the first and second finger, with the middle and pinky finger we create gentle but proper pressure in the superior margin of the mask, against the patient´s cheekbone (C) as we follow this prior steps while examining the patient, we prevent that warm breath escapes from the top of patient´s mask, consequently avoiding fogging.

In the light of these events we propose a simple technique that can be applied to each patient wearing a facemask (Figure 1):

The patient rests the head and chin on the slit-lamp instrument, properly wearing the facemask, covering the mouth and nose.

A non-contact indirect lens (78 or 90 D), or a contact (Goldman 3 mirror lens) is held at its proper position.

While holding the lens with the first and second fingers, we create a gentle but proper pressure over the upper edge of the mask against the patient’s cheekbone with our annular and pinky finger. In this manner, we avoid that warm breath escapes from the top of our patient’s mask, consequently avoiding fogging over the lens.

Also note that our third finger is still available in case we need to elevate the patient’s eyelid gaining full eye exposure for fundus and anterior chamber angle examination, thus improving visualization.

Conclusion

Although there is plenty of evidence and guidelines with continuous exponential growth, they should be considered an adjacent tool that still needs a personal context application concerning each situation in our daily practice. This technique is a useful adjuvant through this island of individuality regarding this specifical situation. On the other hand, it is not out of the equation to note that, despite touching the patient’s mask’s anterior surface may expose to more significant contact with eye secretions, acquiring coronavirus by this path has not been fully demonstrated.10 We also consider that, given the current regulations of constant handwashing after each examination and adding gloves will significantly reduce this exposure, and in no way will this be riskier than removing the patient’s mask, as usually happens.

Adaptation and creativity have been part of human evolution, and we hope that sharing this little pearl with the ophthalmological community, however simple it may seem, will aid in patient management during this difficult time.