Literature DB >> 33384423

Divided attention does not affect the acquisition and consolidation of transitional probabilities.

Kata Horváth1,2,3, Csenge Török2, Orsolya Pesthy1,2, Dezso Nemeth4,5,6, Karolina Janacsek2,3,7.   

Abstract

Statistical learning facilitates the efficient processing and prediction of environmental events and contributes to the acquisition of automatic behaviors. Whereas a minimal level of attention seems to be required for learning to occur, it is still unclear how acquisition and consolidation of statistical knowledge are affected when attention is divided during learning. To test the effect of divided attention on statistical learning and consolidation, ninety-six healthy young adults performed the Alternating Serial Reaction Time task in which they incidentally acquired second-order transitional probabilities. Half of the participants completed the task with a concurrent secondary intentional sequence learning task that was applied to the same stimulus stream. The other half of the participants performed the task without any attention manipulation. Performance was retested after a 12-h post-learning offline period. Half of each group slept during the delay, while the other half had normal daily activity, enabling us to test the effect of delay activity (sleep vs. wake) on the consolidation of statistical knowledge. Divided attention had no effect on statistical learning: The acquisition of second-order transitional probabilities was comparable with and without the secondary task. Consolidation was neither affected by divided attention: Statistical knowledge was similarly retained over the 12-h delay, irrespective of the delay activity. Our findings can contribute to a better understanding of the role of attentional processes in and the robustness of visuomotor statistical learning and consolidation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33384423      PMCID: PMC7775459          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79232-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  67 in total

1.  Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure.

Authors:  A Destrebecqz; A Cleeremans
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

2.  Relationship between priming and recognition in deterministic and probabilistic sequence learning.

Authors:  David R Shanks; Leonora Wilkinson; Shelley Channon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The dynamics of implicit skill consolidation in young and elderly adults.

Authors:  Dezso Nemeth; Karolina Janacsek
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 4.  Implicit learning and statistical learning: one phenomenon, two approaches.

Authors:  Pierre Perruchet; Sebastien Pacton
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Age differences in implicit learning of higher order dependencies in serial patterns.

Authors:  J H Howard; D V Howard
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1997-12

Review 6.  Domain generality versus modality specificity: the paradox of statistical learning.

Authors:  Ram Frost; Blair C Armstrong; Noam Siegelman; Morten H Christiansen
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.

Authors:  R C Oldfield
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 8.  Do infants retain the statistics of a statistical learning experience? Insights from a developmental cognitive neuroscience perspective.

Authors:  Rebecca L Gómez
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  Bayesian Versus Orthodox Statistics: Which Side Are You On?

Authors:  Zoltan Dienes
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-05

10.  Declarative and Non-declarative Memory Consolidation in Children with Sleep Disorder.

Authors:  Eszter Csábi; Pálma Benedek; Karolina Janacsek; Zsófia Zavecz; Gábor Katona; Dezso Nemeth
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  2 in total

1.  Statistical learning occurs during practice while high-order rule learning during rest period.

Authors:  Romain Quentin; Lison Fanuel; Mariann Kiss; Marine Vernet; Teodóra Vékony; Karolina Janacsek; Leonardo G Cohen; Dezso Nemeth
Journal:  NPJ Sci Learn       Date:  2021-07-01

2.  Regularity detection under stress: Faster extraction of probability-based regularities.

Authors:  Eszter Tóth-Fáber; Karolina Janacsek; Ágnes Szőllősi; Szabolcs Kéri; Dezso Nemeth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.