Literature DB >> 33383831

Active and Passive Electro-Optical Sensors for Health Assessment in Food Crops.

Thomas Fahey1,2, Hai Pham1, Alessandro Gardi1,2, Roberto Sabatini1,2, Dario Stefanelli2,3, Ian Goodwin2,4, David William Lamb2.   

Abstract

In agriculture, early detection of plant stresses is advantageous in preventing crop yield losses. Remote sensors are increasingly being utilized for crop health monitoring, offering non-destructive, spatialized detection and the quantification of plant diseases at various levels of measurement. Advances in sensor technologies have promoted the development of novel techniques for precision agriculture. As in situ techniques are surpassed by multispectral imaging, refinement of hyperspectral imaging and the promising emergence of light detection and ranging (LIDAR), remote sensing will define the future of biotic and abiotic plant stress detection, crop yield estimation and product quality. The added value of LIDAR-based systems stems from their greater flexibility in capturing data, high rate of data delivery and suitability for a high level of automation while overcoming the shortcomings of passive systems limited by atmospheric conditions, changes in light, viewing angle and canopy structure. In particular, a multi-sensor systems approach and associated data fusion techniques (i.e., blending LIDAR with existing electro-optical sensors) offer increased accuracy in plant disease detection by focusing on traditional optimal estimation and the adoption of artificial intelligence techniques for spatially and temporally distributed big data. When applied across different platforms (handheld, ground-based, airborne, ground/aerial robotic vehicles or satellites), these electro-optical sensors offer new avenues to predict and react to plant stress and disease. This review examines the key sensor characteristics, platform integration options and data analysis techniques recently proposed in the field of precision agriculture and highlights the key challenges and benefits of each concept towards informing future research in this very important and rapidly growing field.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LIDAR; agriculture; artificial intelligence; disease detection; electro-optics; fluorescence; food crop; heath assessment; hyperspectral; laser; machine learning; multispectral; precision agriculture; remote sensing; sensor; spectroscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33383831      PMCID: PMC7795220          DOI: 10.3390/s21010171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sensors (Basel)        ISSN: 1424-8220            Impact factor:   3.576


  40 in total

Review 1.  Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices.

Authors:  David Tilman; Kenneth G Cassman; Pamela A Matson; Rosamond Naylor; Stephen Polasky
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-08-08       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Spaceborne estimate of atmospheric CO2 column by use of the differential absorption method: error analysis.

Authors:  Emmanuel Dufour; François-Marie Bréon
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2003-06-20       Impact factor: 1.980

3.  High power laser propagation.

Authors:  F G Gebhardt
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1976-06-01       Impact factor: 1.980

Review 4.  Remote sensing of plant functional types.

Authors:  Susan L Ustin; John A Gamon
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 5.  Monitoring and screening plant populations with combined thermal and chlorophyll fluorescence imaging.

Authors:  Laury Chaerle; Ilkka Leinonen; Hamlyn G Jones; Dominique Van Der Straeten
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 6.992

6.  The potential of genetically enhanced plants to address food insecurity.

Authors:  Paul Christou; Richard M Twyman
Journal:  Nutr Res Rev       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.800

7.  Deep Neural Networks Based Recognition of Plant Diseases by Leaf Image Classification.

Authors:  Srdjan Sladojevic; Marko Arsenovic; Andras Anderla; Dubravko Culibrk; Darko Stefanovic
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-22

8.  High-throughput field phenotyping using hyperspectral reflectance and partial least squares regression (PLSR) reveals genetic modifications to photosynthetic capacity.

Authors:  Katherine Meacham-Hensold; Christopher M Montes; Jin Wu; Kaiyu Guan; Peng Fu; Elizabeth A Ainsworth; Taylor Pederson; Caitlin E Moore; Kenny Lee Brown; Christine Raines; Carl J Bernacchi
Journal:  Remote Sens Environ       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 13.850

9.  Combining UAV-based hyperspectral imagery and machine learning algorithms for soil moisture content monitoring.

Authors:  Xiangyu Ge; Jingzhe Wang; Jianli Ding; Xiaoyi Cao; Zipeng Zhang; Jie Liu; Xiaohang Li
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Detection of rice sheath blight using an unmanned aerial system with high-resolution color and multispectral imaging.

Authors:  Dongyan Zhang; Xingen Zhou; Jian Zhang; Yubin Lan; Chao Xu; Dong Liang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  CubeSat constellations provide enhanced crop phenology and digital agricultural insights using daily leaf area index retrievals.

Authors:  Kasper Johansen; Matteo G Ziliani; Rasmus Houborg; Trenton E Franz; Matthew F McCabe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.