Literature DB >> 33382855

Effect of nanoparticles concentration on electromagnetic-assisted oil recovery using ZnO nanofluids.

Muhammad Adil1, Keanchuan Lee1, Hasnah Mohd Zaid1, M Fadhllullah A Shukur1, Takaaki Manaka2.   

Abstract

Utilization of metal-oxide nanoparticles (NPs) in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) has generated substantial recent research interest in this area. Among these NPs, zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) have demonstrated promising results in improving oil recovery due to their prominent thermal properties. These nanoparticles can also be polarized by electromagnetic (EM) field, which offers a unique Nano-EOR approach called EM-assisted Nano-EOR. However, the impact of NPs concentrations on oil recovery mechanism under EM field has not been well established. For this purpose, ZnO nanofluids (ZnO-NFs) of two different particle sizes (55.7 and 117.1 nm) were formed by dispersing NPs between 0.01 wt.% to 0.1 wt.% in a basefluid of sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate (SDBS) and NaCl to study their effect on oil recovery mechanism under the electromagnetic field. This mechanism involved parameters, including mobility ratio, interfacial tension (IFT) and wettability. The displacement tests were conducted in water-wet sandpacks at 95˚C, by employing crude oil from Tapis. Three tertiary recovery scenarios have been performed, including (i) SDBS surfactant flooding as a reference, (ii) ZnO-NFs flooding, and (iii) EM-assisted ZnO-NFs flooding. Compare with incremental oil recovery from surfactant flooding (2.1% original oil in place/OOIP), nanofluid flooding reaches up to 10.2% of OOIP at optimal 0.1 wt.% ZnO (55.7 nm). Meanwhile, EM-assisted nanofluid flooding at 0.1 wt.% ZnO provides a maximum oil recovery of 10.39% and 13.08% of OOIP under EM frequency of 18.8 and 167 MHz, respectively. By assessing the IFT/contact angle and mobility ratio, the optimal NPs concentration to achieve a favorable ER effect and interfacial disturbance is determined, correlated to smaller hydrodynamic-sized nanoparticles that cause strong electrostatic repulsion between particles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33382855      PMCID: PMC7774934          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  8 in total

1.  Heterogeneous and anisotropic dynamics of a 2D gel.

Authors:  D Orsi; L Cristofolini; G Baldi; A Madsen
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Frequency-dependent electromechanics of aqueous liquids: electrowetting and dielectrophoresis.

Authors:  T B Jones; K L Wang; D J Yao
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2004-03-30       Impact factor: 3.882

3.  Effect of nanoparticles on sessile droplet contact angle.

Authors:  S Vafaei; T Borca-Tasciuc; M Z Podowski; A Purkayastha; G Ramanath; P M Ajayan
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 3.874

4.  Nanoparticle assembly at fluid interfaces: structure and dynamics.

Authors:  Yao Lin; Alexander Böker; Habib Skaff; David Cookson; A D Dinsmore; Todd Emrick; Thomas P Russell
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2005-01-04       Impact factor: 3.882

5.  Degradation of sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate in water by ultrasonic irradiation.

Authors:  Eleni Manousaki; Elefteria Psillakis; Nicolas Kalogerakis; Dionissios Mantzavinos
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 11.236

6.  Carbon-based nanoreporters designed for subsurface hydrogen sulfide detection.

Authors:  Chih-Chau Hwang; Gedeng Ruan; Lu Wang; Haiyan Zheng; Errol L G Samuel; Changsheng Xiang; Wei Lu; William Kasper; Kewei Huang; Zhiwei Peng; Zachary Schaefer; Amy T Kan; Angel A Martí; Michael S Wong; Mason B Tomson; James M Tour
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 9.229

7.  Experimental stability analysis of different water-based nanofluids.

Authors:  Laura Fedele; Laura Colla; Sergio Bobbo; Simona Barison; Filippo Agresti
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 4.703

8.  Experimental study on electromagnetic-assisted ZnO nanofluid flooding for enhanced oil recovery (EOR).

Authors:  Muhammad Adil; Keanchuan Lee; Hasnah Mohd Zaid; Noor Rasyada Ahmad Latiff; Mohamad Sahban Alnarabiji
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.