Literature DB >> 33382834

Validation of a simplified risk prediction model using a cloud based critical care registry in a lower-middle income country.

Bharath Kumar Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan1, Dilanthi Priyadarshini2, Aasiyah Rashan2, Abi Beane3, Ramesh Venkataraman1, Nagarajan Ramakrishnan1, Rashan Haniffa3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of severity of illness scoring systems such as the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation in lower-middle income settings comes with important limitations, primarily due to data burden, missingness of key variables and lack of resources. To overcome these challenges, in Asia, a simplified model, designated as e-TropICS was previously developed. We sought to externally validate this model using data from a multi-centre critical care registry in India.
METHODS: Seven ICUs from the Indian Registry of IntenSive care(IRIS) contributed data to this study. Patients > 18 years of age with an ICU length of stay > 6 hours were included. Data including age, gender, co-morbidity, diagnostic category, type of admission, vital signs, laboratory measurements and outcomes were collected for all admissions. e-TropICS was calculated as per original methods. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was used to express the model's power to discriminate between survivors and non-survivors. For all tests of significance, a 2-sided P less than or equal to 0.05 was considered to be significant. AUROC values were considered poor when ≤ to 0.70, adequate between 0.71 to 0.80, good between 0.81 to 0.90, and excellent at 0.91 or higher. Calibration was assessed using Hosmer-Lemeshow C -statistic.
RESULTS: We included data from 2062 consecutive patient episodes. The median age of the cohort was 60 and predominantly male (n = 1350, 65.47%). Mechanical Ventilation and vasopressors were administered at admission in 504 (24.44%) and 423 (20.51%) patients respectively. Overall, mortality at ICU discharge was 10.28% (n = 212). Discrimination (AUC) for the e-TropICS model was 0.83 (95% CI 0.812-0.839) with an HL C statistic p value of < 0.05. The best sensitivity and specificity (84% and 72% respectively) were achieved with the model at an optimal cut-off for probability of 0.29.
CONCLUSION: e-TropICS has utility in the care of critically unwell patients in the South Asia region with good discriminative capacity. Further refinement of calibration in larger datasets from India and across the South-East Asia region will help in improving model performance.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33382834      PMCID: PMC7775074          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  14 in total

1.  Caution when using prognostic models: a prospective comparison of 3 recent prognostic models.

Authors:  Antonio Paulo Nassar; Amilcar Oshiro Mocelin; André Luiz Baptiston Nunes; Fabio Poianas Giannini; Leonardo Brauer; Fabio Moreira Andrade; Carlos Augusto Dias
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.425

2.  Calibration strategies to validate predictive models: is new always better?

Authors:  Nicolás Serrano
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  A simplified acute physiology score for ICU patients.

Authors:  J R Le Gall; P Loirat; A Alperovitch; P Glaser; C Granthil; D Mathieu; P Mercier; R Thomas; D Villers
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Effect of mortality rate on the performance of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II: a simulation study.

Authors:  L G Glance; T M Osler; P Papadakos
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Effect of varying the case mix on the standardized mortality ratio and W statistic: A simulation study.

Authors:  L G Glance; T Osler; T Shinozaki
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system.

Authors:  W A Knaus; J E Zimmerman; D P Wagner; E A Draper; D E Lawrence
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study.

Authors:  J R Le Gall; S Lemeshow; F Saulnier
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993 Dec 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Assessing the calibration of mortality benchmarks in critical care: The Hosmer-Lemeshow test revisited.

Authors:  Andrew A Kramer; Jack E Zimmerman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Predicting Mortality in Low-Income Country ICUs: The Rwanda Mortality Probability Model (R-MPM).

Authors:  Elisabeth D Riviello; Willy Kiviri; Robert A Fowler; Ariel Mueller; Victor Novack; Valerie M Banner-Goodspeed; Julia L Weinkauf; Daniel S Talmor; Theogene Twagirumugabe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Implementing an intensive care registry in India: preliminary results of the case-mix program and an opportunity for quality improvement and research.

Authors:  Neill K J Adhikari; Rajeshwari Arali; Udara Attanayake; Sampath Balasundaram; Abi Beane; Vijay Chakravarthy; Niyaz Channanath Ashraf; Sri Darshana; Dedeepiya Devaprasad; Arjen M Dondorp; Robert Fowler; Rashan Haniffa; Pramodya Ishani; Augustian James; Issrah Jawad; Devachandran Jayakumar; Chamira Kodipilly; Rakesh Laxmappa; Kishore Mangal; Ashwin Mani; Meghena Mathew; Sristi Patodia; Rajyabardhan Pattnaik; Dilanthi Priyadarshini; Mathew Pulicken; Ebenezer Rabindrarajan; Pratheema Ramachandran; Kavita Ramesh; Usha Rani; Suchitra Ranjit; Ananth Ramaiyan; Nagarajan Ramakrishnan; Lakshmi Ranganathan; Thalha Rashan; Raymond Dominic Savio; Jaganathan Selva; Bharath Kumar Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan; Swagata Tripathy; Timo Tolppa; Ishara Udayanga; Ramesh Venkataraman; Deepak Vijayan
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2020-07-30
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  What intensive care registries can teach us about outcomes.

Authors:  Abi Beane; Jorge I F Salluh; Rashan Haniffa
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.359

2.  Predicting Violent Reoffending in Individuals Released From Prison in a Lower-Middle-Income Country: A Validation of OxRec in Tajikistan.

Authors:  Gabrielle Beaudry; Rongqin Yu; Arash Alaei; Kamiar Alaei; Seena Fazel
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 5.435

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.