Literature DB >> 33382726

Perception of urban subdivisions in pedestrian movement simulation.

Gabriele Filomena1, Ed Manley2,3, Judith A Verstegen1.   

Abstract

The perception of urban subdivisions, deriving from regionalisation processes and the identification of separating elements (barriers), has proven to dynamically shape peoples' cognitive representations of space and route choice behaviour in cities. However, existing Agent-Based Models (ABMs) for pedestrian simulation have not accounted for these particular cognitive mapping processes. The aim of this paper is to explore the behaviour of pedestrian agents endowed with knowledge about urban subdivisions. Drawing from literature in spatial cognition, we adapted a region-based route choice model, which contemplates a high- and a local planning level, and advanced a barrier-based route choice model, wherein the influence of separating elements is manipulated. Finally, we combined these two approaches in a region-barrier based model. The patterns emerging from the movement of agents employing such approaches were examined in the city centres of London and Paris. The introduction of regions in the routing mechanisms reduced the unbalanced concentration of agents across the street network brought up by the widely employed least cumulative angular change model (-.08 Gini coefficient). The inclusion of barriers further raised the dispersal of the agents through secondary roads, while leading agents to walk along waterfronts and across parks; it also yielded a more regular usage of pedestrian roads. Moreover, the region- and the region-barrier based routes showed deviation ratio values from the road distance shortest path (region-based: 1.18 London, 1.16 Paris, region-barrier based: 1.43 London, 1.33 Paris) consistent with empirical observations from pedestrian behaviour research. A further evaluation of the model with macro-level observational data may enhance the understanding of pedestrian dynamics and help tuning the interplay amongst urban salient elements at the agent level. Yet, we consider the movement flows arising from our current implementation insightful for assessing the distribution of pedestrians and testing possible interventions for the design of legible and walkable spaces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33382726      PMCID: PMC7774988          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  20 in total

Review 1.  Environmental boundaries as a mechanism for correcting and anchoring spatial maps.

Authors:  Lisa M Giocomo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Understanding memory through hippocampal remapping.

Authors:  Laura Lee Colgin; Edvard I Moser; May-Britt Moser
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurons.

Authors:  J O'Keefe; N Burgess
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-05-30       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Mental representations of spatial relations.

Authors:  T P McNamara
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Distortions in judged spatial relations.

Authors:  A Stevens; P Coupe
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps.

Authors:  S C Hirtle; J Jonides
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-05

Review 7.  The hippocampus as a cognitive graph.

Authors:  R U Muller; M Stead; J Pach
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.086

8.  Planning paths to multiple targets: memory involvement and planning heuristics in spatial problem solving.

Authors:  J M Wiener; N N Ehbauer; H A Mallot
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-11-08

9.  Exploring the Structure of Spatial Representations.

Authors:  Tamas Madl; Stan Franklin; Ke Chen; Robert Trappl; Daniela Montaldi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Navigating with grid and place cells in cluttered environments.

Authors:  Vegard Edvardsen; Andrej Bicanski; Neil Burgess
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 3.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.