Literature DB >> 33382380

Using Friendship Ties to Understand the Prevalence of, and Factors Associated With, Intimate Partner Violence Among Adolescents and Young Adults in Kenya: Cross-Sectional, Respondent-Driven Survey Study.

Peter Memiah1, Anne Kamau2, Yvonne Opanga3, Samuel Muhula3, Emmanuel Nyakeriga4, Felix Humwa4, Courtney Cook5, Caroline Kingori6, Job Muriithi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optimization of innovative approaches is required for estimating the intimate partner violence (IPV) burden among adolescents and young adults (AYA). Further investigation is required to identify risk and protective factors associated with IPV among AYA. There remain significant gaps in understanding these factors among this vulnerable population.
OBJECTIVE: The goal of our study was to determine the prevalence of IPV among an urban population of AYA and to identify factors associated with IPV among AYA.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study design utilizing respondent-driven sampling was adopted. The study was conducted among 887 AYA, aged 15 to 24 years, residing in Nairobi, Kenya. Data were collected through a phone-based survey using the REACH (Reaching, Engaging Adolescents and Young Adults for Care Continuum in Health)-AYA app. Questions on behavioral and psychosocial factors were adopted from different standardized questionnaires. Descriptive, bivariate, and multivariable statistics were used to describe the characteristics of the study sample.
RESULTS: Of the 887 participants, a higher proportion were male (540/887, 60.9%) compared to female (347/887, 39.1%). The prevalence of IPV was 22.3% (124/556). IPV was associated with being unsure if it was okay for a boy to hit his girlfriend, living in a home with physical violence or abuse, and being bullied (P=.005). The likelihood of experiencing IPV was higher among respondents whose friends and family members used alcohol (odds ratio [OR] 1.80, 95% CI 1.09-2.98) and among those who had repeated a class at school in the past two years (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.11-3.23). Respondents who visited a health facility or doctor for reproductive health services were 2 times more likely to experience IPV (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.40-3.70). Respondents who had used illicit drugs were 2 times more likely to experience IPV (OR 4.31, 95% CI 2.64-7.04). The probability of experiencing IPV decreased by 63% (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16-0.85) among respondents who refused to have sex with someone who was not prepared to use a condom.
CONCLUSIONS: IPV remains a significant public health priority because of its impact to society. Our results are in congruence with other similar studies. Efforts toward incorporating appropriate IPV core measures into the comprehensive care package for every AYA seeking health services should be explored. Programs need to address constellations of risk and protective factors linked to IPV in an effort to prevent its occurrence. ©Peter Memiah, Anne Kamau, Yvonne Opanga, Samuel Muhula, Emmanuel Nyakeriga, Felix Humwa, Courtney Cook, Caroline Kingori, Job Muriithi. Originally published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research (http://www.i-jmr.org/), 31.12.2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Africa; abuse; adolescents; bullying; intimate partner violence; physical abuse; prevalence; risk; young adults

Year:  2020        PMID: 33382380      PMCID: PMC7808892          DOI: 10.2196/19023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact J Med Res        ISSN: 1929-073X


  32 in total

Review 1.  Prevention and treatment of pediatric obesity using mobile and wireless technologies: a systematic review.

Authors:  T Turner; D Spruijt-Metz; C K F Wen; M D Hingle
Journal:  Pediatr Obes       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Close friend and group influence on adolescent cigarette smoking and alcohol use.

Authors:  K A Urberg; S M Değirmencioğlu; C Pilgrim
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  1997-09

3.  The BlackBerry Project: The Hidden World of Adolescents' Text Messaging and Relations With Internalizing Symptoms.

Authors:  Marion K Underwood; Samuel E Ehrenreich; David More; Jerome S Solis; Dawn Y Brinkley
Journal:  J Res Adolesc       Date:  2015-03-01

4.  Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence.

Authors:  Claudia Garcia-Moreno; Henrica A F M Jansen; Mary Ellsberg; Lori Heise; Charlotte H Watts
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Beyond Homophily: A Decade of Advances in Understanding Peer Influence Processes.

Authors:  Whitney A Brechwald; Mitchell J Prinstein
Journal:  J Res Adolesc       Date:  2011-03-01

6.  Gender, power, and intimate partner violence: a study on couples from rural Malawi.

Authors:  Amy A Conroy
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2013-11-12

7.  Guidelines for reporting of health interventions using mobile phones: mobile health (mHealth) evidence reporting and assessment (mERA) checklist.

Authors:  Smisha Agarwal; Amnesty E LeFevre; Jaime Lee; Kelly L'Engle; Garrett Mehl; Chaitali Sinha; Alain Labrique
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-03-17

8.  Preventing domestic abuse for children and young people: A review of school-based interventions.

Authors:  Nicky Stanley; Jane Ellis; Nicola Farrelly; Sandra Hollinghurst; Soo Downe
Journal:  Child Youth Serv Rev       Date:  2015-12

9.  Intimate partner violence among adolescents and young women: prevalence and associated factors in nine countries: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Heidi Stöckl; Laura March; Christina Pallitto; Claudia Garcia-Moreno
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Health-Related Internet Use by Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Eunhee Park; Misol Kwon
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.