The base-induced (t-BuOK) rearrangement reactions of 3,4-dihydro-2H-1,2,3-benzothiadiazine 1,1-dioxides result in a ring opening along the N-N bond, followed by ring closure with the formation of new C-N bonds. The position of the newly formed C-N bond can selectively be tuned by the amount of the base, providing access to new, pharmacologically interesting ring systems with high yield. While with 2 equiv of t-BuOK 1,2-benzisothiazoles can be obtained in a diaza-[1,2]-Wittig reaction, with 6 equiv of the base 1,2-benzothiazine 1,1-dioxides can be prepared in most cases as the main product, in a diaza-[1,3]-Wittig reaction. DFT calculations and detailed NMR studies clarified the mechanism, with a mono- or dianionic key intermediate, depending on the amount of the reactant base. Also, the role of an enamide intermediate formed during the workup of the highly basic (6 equiv of base) reaction was clarified. The substrate scope of the reaction was also explored in detail.
The base-induced (t-BuOK) rearrangement reactions of 3,4-dihydro-2H-1,2,3-benzothiadiazine 1,1-dioxides result in a ring opening along the N-N bond, followed by ring closure with the formation of new C-N bonds. The position of the newly formed C-N bond can selectively be tuned by the amount of the base, providing access to new, pharmacologically interesting ring systems with high yield. While with 2 equiv of t-BuOK 1,2-benzisothiazolescan be obtained in a diaza-[1,2]-Wittig reaction, with 6 equiv of the base 1,2-benzothiazine 1,1-dioxidescan be prepared in most cases as the main product, in a diaza-[1,3]-Wittig reaction. DFT calculations and detailed NMR studies clarified the mechanism, with a mono- or dianionic key intermediate, depending on the amount of the reactant base. Also, the role of an enamide intermediate formed during the workup of the highly basic (6 equiv of base) reaction was clarified. The substrate scope of the reaction was also explored in detail.
Carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen atoms are the main constituents of
organic frameworks, thus the selective formation of their bonds belongs
to the most important organic transformations. [1,2]-Stevens reaction
(Scheme A) is a well
investigated example,[1] where the ylide
(formed after a base-induced deprotonation of one of the α-carbon
atoms of a quaternary ammonium salt) takes part in a rearrangement
via a [1,2]-shift of a nitrogen substituent. During this reaction
step, a tight radical pair is usually formed after the cleavage of
the C–N bond, but with certain substituents a concerted mechanism
is proposed.[2,3] [1,2]-Wittig rearrangements (Scheme B)[4] with oxygen as the heteroatom and aza-[1,2]-Wittig
rearrangements (Scheme C) are related transformations. This latter reaction can be considered
as a nonclassical Stevens rearrangement, since here the reactant is
a neutral species. While Wittig reactions including their variants[5] are well investigated, likewise the Stevens reaction,
the aza-[1,2]-Wittig transformation is rare[6−8] and is often a side reaction, competing with aza-[2,3]-Wittig rearrangement.[2,3]-Wittig Sigmatropic
Rearrangement of Acyclic Amines: Scope and Limitations of Silicon
Assistance. J. Org. Chem.. 2000 ">9,2,3]-Aza-Wittig
Rearrangement. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.. 2019 ">10] In the case of tetrasubstituted
hydrazines, the N–N bond is breaking and the terminal amino
unit is shifting, resulting in a diaza-[1,2]-Wittig
rearrangement (Scheme D).[11−16] Exposure of these derivatives to bases can also result in imines
and amines as possible intermediates,[16,17] indicating
that with the breaking of the N–N bond during the reaction,
the formation of new N–H bonds becomes also feasible. Diaza-1,4-Wittig rearrangement is also precedented;[18] nonetheless, the diaza-[1,2,3]- and [1,2]-Sigmatropic Rearrangements Based on
a Study of Ammonium Ylides. J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2014 ">3]-Wittig
reaction is a missing link.
Scheme 1
Stevens, Wittig, and Related Rearrangements; Our Previous Work, All
Involving α-Deprotonation and [1,2]-Migration Steps; and the
Present Work
Recently, we have reported a facile and (at the 4-position) substituent
tolerant diaza-[1,2]-Wittig rearrangement of 3-acetyl-7,8-dichloro-2-methyl-3,4-dihydro-2H-1,2,3-benzothiadiazine 1,1-dioxides (1, Scheme E) to the corresponding
3-acetamido substituted 2,3-dihydro-1,2-benzisothiazole 1,1-dioxides
(2), representatives of a compound family of biological
relevance,[19−25] in the presence of a suspension of 2 equiv of NaOH (or t-BuOK) in THF.[26] While in our previous
work we tentatively proposed an ionic pathway for this diaza-[1,2]-Wittig reaction yielding the benzisothiazole dioxides (2, Scheme E),[26] the mechanism was not investigated
in detail. During these investigations we now surprisingly found that,
in the presence of a larger amount of base, the reaction gave also
rise to the formation of an unexpected benzothiazine derivative (3, Scheme F). These new results are reported below.
Results and Discussion
When seeking mechanistic information on the reaction starting from
compound 1a, we realized that depending on the basicity
of the system (i.e., on the amount of t-BuOK applied),
the reaction could result either in the previously described benzisothiazole 2a(26) or in an unexpected benzothiazine
derivative 3a (Scheme ), the latter being again a molecular framework in
the focus of recent pharmacological interest.[27−35] Hereby we explore the mechanism of this highly complex reaction
and demonstrate that it is possible to selectively influence the outcome
of the reaction toward any of the two different products. The corresponding
experimental and computational studies are described below, with further
details disclosed in the Supporting Information (SI).
Scheme 2
Discovery of the Basicity-Dependent Rearrangement Reactions
Computational Examination of the Deprotonation of Benzothiadiazine
Dioxide 1a, As the Initial Step of the Rearrangement
Having observed the diaza-[1,2]-Wittig reaction
leading to 1,2-benzisothiazole 2a(26) and considering the lack of mechanistic studies on this
transformation, first we aimed to investigate the mechanism of the
ring contraction of 4-methyl derivative 1a. Since the
presumable first elementary step of the rearrangement is the deprotonation
of 1a, we studied the effect of various bases (2 equiv)
on the reaction shown in Scheme (left). If the basicity was sufficient for deprotonation
(t-BuOK, NaOH, NaOMe, and DBU), 2a could
be isolated in excellent yields (Table S1 in the SI), otherwise (DIPEA, NaOAc) 1a was recovered.
The possible positions for gas-phase proton abstraction were considered
computationally (Scheme ). As expected, the far most favored deprotonation site is the C(4)
atom yielding anion I, which is the likely starting point of the [1,2]-rearrangement.
(For gas-phase acidity of some other systems at the same level of
theory, see Table S2 in the SI). For further
investigations, we decided to use t-BuOK as the deprotonating
agent, since 2 equiv of this base gave 1,2-benzisothiazole dioxide 2a selectively and with excellent isolated yield (Scheme ).[26]
Scheme 3
Evaluation of the Gas-Phase Acidity of 1a at Different
Positions and the Anion (I) Obtained after Deprotonation
Deprotonation Gibbs free energies
are given in kcal/mol.
Evaluation of the Gas-Phase Acidity of 1a at Different
Positions and the Anion (I) Obtained after Deprotonation
Deprotonation Gibbs free energies
are given in kcal/mol.
NMR Study of the Effect of the Amount of t-BuOK
on the Reaction Mechanism
Aiming to obtain information on
the reaction mechanism, the 1HNMR spectrum of the reaction
mixture of 1a and 2 equiv of t-BuOK
was investigated in [D6]DMSO, immediately after mixing
the reactants (Figure b). The detected signals corresponded to two compounds present in
comparable amounts (ca. 1.1:1.0 molar ratio). When decreasing the
amount of t-BuOK to 1 equiv, the signals marked by
red (Figure a) become
dominant. On the basis of the appearance of the characteristic 2.58/77.9
three-bond HMBCcross-peak (see the SI, page S26) caused by the vicinal 3J(NCH3/C-4) coupling, the
compound can unequivocally be assigned to structural formula II. Thus, the presence of III, which would be indistinguishable
by simple 1HNMR, can be excluded. The presence of intermediate II featuring the 1,2-benzisothiazole
ring is also in accordance with the formation of 2a upon
protonation (i.e., quenching by water) and subsequent crystallization.
Furthermore, it has to be noted that the formation of acylimine 4a (the apparent protonation product of III) was neither here, nor in our further
experiments (see below) observed.
Figure 1
1H NMR analysis of reaction mixtures measured immediately
after mixing 1a (20 mg, 6.2 mmol) and 1 equiv (a, red),
2 equiv (b, green), or 6 equiv (c, blue) of t-BuOK
(6.2, 12.4, or 37.1 mmol, respectively) in [D6]DMSO (800
μL) at 22 °C; and the corresponding neutral products obtained
after quenching with water (d).
1HNMR analysis of reaction mixtures measured immediately
after mixing 1a (20 mg, 6.2 mmol) and 1 equiv (a, red),
2 equiv (b, green), or 6 equiv (c, blue) of t-BuOK
(6.2, 12.4, or 37.1 mmol, respectively) in [D6]DMSO (800
μL) at 22 °C; and the corresponding neutral products obtained
after quenching with water (d).In the presence of 6 equiv t-BuOK, however, the
peaks marked by blue (Figure /c) including the characteristic signals of a methylidene
H2C= group (δ 4.56/3.94 ppm) become dominant. This
dependence on the concentration of the base indicates that a dianioniccompound, which was assigned as enamide dianion IV, was formed in the reaction mixture
after removal of a second proton by the large excess of base. (For
a detailed discussion of the 1HNMR and LC-MS spectra of
the reaction mixture containing IV, see page S3 in the SI.) After quenching
this reaction mixture with water and immediate extraction with DCM,
not only product 3a (47%) and the minor component 2a (8%) could be identified by their 1HNMR spectra,
but also enamide (5a, Figure /d, 45%) could be detected (Figure S3 in the SI). However, after our usual workup (evaporation
of THF from the quenched mixture in vacuo) no 5a was
present in the precipitated product, which was obtained in 84% overall
isolated yield, consisting mainly (92%) 1,2-benzothiazine 1,1-dioxide 3a, with 2a as the minor product (8%). The structure
of compound 3a was confirmed by detailed NMR studies
and by single-crystal X-ray measurement (as a monohydrate). Structural
details of compounds 1a(26) and 3a·HO are given
in the SI (Figures S11 and S12 and Tables S4 and S5).
Effect of the Reaction Conditions on the Selectivity of the
Rearrangements
It became obvious that the formation of the
rearranged products 2a and/or 3a largely
depended on the amount and strength of the base applied, providing
a simple and convenient way to selectively tune the outcome of the
reaction. As the next step, the conversion of compound 1a has been investigated under various basicconditions (Table ). The use of up to 2 equiv
of t-BuOK in THF gave 2a selectively
in high yields (Table , entries 1 and 2). Upon increasing the amount of t-BuOK gradually to 8 equiv (entries 3–6), mixtures of 2a and 3a were isolated, and the selectivity
could be shifted to 3a (best with 6 equiv, entry 5).
Change of the counterion to Na+ (entry 7) gave similar
results. Use of 6 equiv of other bases in THF led to the formation
of 2a in high yields (entries 8–10). When applying
6 equiv of t-BuOK in other ether-type solvents or
DMF, 3a was obtained again as the major product (entries
11–14). Most importantly, from DMSO pure 3a could
be crystallized in 80% yield (entry 15), thereby making this reaction
variant a practical synthesis of benzothiazine dioxide 3a. On the contrary, using the protic t-BuOH, where
the formation of the dianion intermediate is unlikely, 2a (entry 16) was the sole product obtained.
Table 1
Effect of the Reaction Conditions
on the Formation of Rearranged Products 2a and 3a
entrya
base
amount of
base (eq)
solvent
2a:3a ratiob
yield (%)
1
t-BuOK
1
THF
1:0
83 (2a)
2
t-BuOK
2
THF
1:0
90 (2a)
3
t-BuOK
3
THF
1.00:0.88
87 (2a+3a)
4
t-BuOK
4
THF
0.31:1.00
80 (2a+3a)
5
t-BuOK
6
THF
0.09:1.00
84 (2a+3a)
6
t-BuOK
8
THF
0.13:1.00
88 (2a+3a)
7
t-BuONa
6
THF
0.09:1.00
85 (2a+3a)
8
KOH
6
THF
1:0
89 (2a)
9
NaOMe
6
THF
1:0
76 (2a)
10
NaNH2
6
THF
1:0
74 (2a)
11
t-BuOK
6
2-Me-THF
0.14:1.00
88 (2a+3a)
12
t-BuOK
6
1,4-dioxane
0.10:1.00
87 (2a+3a)
13
t-BuOK
6
DME
0.14:1.00
79 (2a+3a)
14
t-BuOK
6
DMFc
0.12:1.00
93 (2a+3a)
15
t-BuOK
6
DMSOd
0:1
84 (3a)
16
t-BuOK
6
t-BuOH
1:0
88 (2a)
Reagents and reaction conditions: 1a (0.6 mmol), base, solvent (3 mL), 25 °C, 30 min, then
quenching with H2O, evaporation and crystallization.
The product ratio of the isolated
mixtures was determined by 1H NMR.
H2O was added after evaporation.
Without evaporation.
Reagents and reaction conditions: 1a (0.6 mmol), base, solvent (3 mL), 25 °C, 30 min, then
quenching with H2O, evaporation and crystallization.The product ratio of the isolated
mixtures was determined by 1HNMR.H2O was added after evaporation.Without evaporation.
DFT Calculations on the Ring Transformations
In order
to provide a reasonable mechanism for the rearrangement of 1a to 2a and 3a, density functional theory
(DFT) calculations have been carried out (Scheme , for the energy profile diagram see Figure S5 in the SI). Based on the investigation
of the Kohn-Sahm molecular orbitals of I, the concerted mechanism furnishing 1,2-benzisothiazole anion II in one step can be excluded.
Though the HOMO is localized at C(4) (see Figure
S4 in the SI), N(2) has no significant contribution to the
LUMO. In accordance with this, we were not able to find any transition
structure for a concerted pathway of the [1,2]-shift yielding II in one step. On the contrary,
we could locate the transition state TS1 corresponding
to the N–N bond cleavage with a barrier of 18.8 kcal/mol leading
to the formation of acylimine anion III, which is significantly (by 15.3 kcal/mol) more stable than I. The closed shell wave function
turned out to be stable for both III and the corresponding transition structure. This is remarkable
since the analogous step was claimed to have a biradical character
in some cases of related Stevens rearrangements involving ylides,[2] but it is in agreement with the observed lack
of any electron spin resonance (ESR) signal or chemically induced
dynamic nuclear polarization (CIDNP) signal intensity enhancement
in the NMR during our experiments. In III the HOMO is at the N(2) atom, and the LUMO has a significant
contribution at the C=N double bond (see Figure S4 in the SI), indicating a subsequent facile ring
closure to form II. Indeed,
this step (TS2) has only a 3.6 kcal/mol activation barrier
facilitating the rapid conversion (note that no NMR signal was observed
for III) to the thermodynamically
more (by 13.8 kcal/mol) stable II. It should be mentioned that the alternative pathway, i.e.,
the direct tautomerization of acylimine anion III to enamide anion V, has a high reaction barrier furthermore V is by 12.6 kcal/mol less
stable than II. Thus,
even if the formation of V from III might be possible
by a base-catalyzed reversible deprotonation/protonation procedure
via IV, the thermodynamic
sink at the monoanionic level is II, in accordance with the NMR results (see above).
Scheme 4
DFT Study of the Reaction Mechanism at M06-2X/6-31+G* (smd: THF)
Level of Theory
Reaction Gibbs free energy
values are presented in kcal/mol.
DFT Study of the Reaction Mechanism at M06-2X/6-31+G* (smd: THF)
Level of Theory
Reaction Gibbs free energy
values are presented in kcal/mol.Altogether, the selective formation of 2a after reprotonation
of II (during the workup
with water) from the reaction of 1a with 1–2 equiv
of t-BuOK via the monoanionic pathway is fully justified
on thermodynamic as well as on kinetic grounds.When applying an excess of base, the formation of dianion IV can easily be achieved
by two alternative ways. First is by deprotonation of III with an excess of t-BuOK at the CH3 group via a barrier of 4.1 kcal/mol,
calculated with respect to an incoming t-BuO– and III as shown in Scheme . This barrier is comparable to that leading to the formation of II from III (3.6 kcal/mol). Alternatively, we can
consider the deprotonation of the experimentally detected II at the C(3)-methyl group. Since
any attempted optimization of the dianion derived by deprotonation
of II resulted in a barrierless
ring opening and finally in the formation of IV, and this pathway is also viable apart from
the direct deprotonation of III discussed above.Upon quenching the reaction mixture with excess of H2O, the protonation of IV yields V thermodynamically
somewhat more favorably than III. Nevertheless, the energy difference between III and V is small (1.2 kcal/mol), in agreement with the presence of
a small amount of 2a (that can be derived from III as discussed above) in
the isolated product. From V, enamide 5a can easily be obtained by further
protonation, and this product was indeed observed after an immediate
extraction of the reaction mixture (carried out with 6 equiv t-BuOK) with DCM, as discussed above. The neutral form of
acylimine (4a, Scheme ) is less stable than 5a, and indeed,
it remained experimentally unobserved. Since after quenching the solution
is still highly basic, enamide 5a can rearranged in a
base-catalyzed reaction sequence, where the first step is a deprotonation.
Thus, we should consider the reactivity of anion V, which can cyclize in a thermodynamically
downhill process via a reasonable 23.4 kcal/mol barrier to carbanion VI,[37] which might lead, after a proton exchange, to 1,2-benzothiazine
anion VII. Either VI or VII can be transformed to 3a by protonation. Product 3a could in principle be obtained
directly from dianion VIII as well, but the direct ring closure of IV to dianion VIII is unlikely, since this transformation has
a high (32.9 kcal/mol) activation barrier (TS5). Indeed,
no other major 1HNMR signals than those of IV could be seen in the presence of
6 equiv of base (Figure ).
Experimental Studies on the Formation of Benzothiazine Dioxide
Derivative 3a
When the reaction of 1a was carried out with 6 equiv of t-BuOK in DMSO,
but quenched with D2O instead of water, [D]3a was obtained in 76% yield with a 92% deuteration ratio at position
4 (Scheme A and Figure S6 in the SI). This finding supports the
suggested mechanism involving the formation of intermediate VI. Clearly, in the CH2 unit of the thiazine ring no deuterium exchange was observed,
showing that this methylene unit remains intact during the series
of transformations, in accordance with our proposed mechanism starting
from IV.
Scheme 5
Experimental Studies on the Formation of the Benzothiazine Ring:
(A) Partial Deuteration Observed after Quenching the Reaction Mixture
with D2O and (B) Ring Expansion of Benzisothiazole 2a to Benzothiazine 3a
The question arose whether 1,2-benzisothiazole 2a could
be rearranged to 1,2-benzothiazine 3a in a sufficiently
basic medium. Treatment of 1,2-benzisothiazole 2a with
6 equiv of t-BuOK at 25 °C for 6 h and subsequent
quenching with water and crystallization afforded a mixture of 1,2-benzisothiazole 2a and 1,2-benzothiazine 3a (in 1.00:0.61 ratio),
proving the occurrence of the 2a → 3a rearrangement (Scheme B). Furthermore, 2 h reflux and subsequent workup provided the “pseudoequilibrial”
product ratio (0.10:1.00, Scheme B), in accordance with that obtained from the reaction
of t-BuOK (6 equiv) and 1a (Table , entry 5). It is
noteworthy that this product ratio corresponds to the Boltzmann population
of III and V as derived from their calculated
1.2 kcal/mol energy difference (Scheme ).While the reaction of 1a with 6 equiv t-BuOK with the standard aqueous workup procedure led to 3a as the main product (Table , entry 5), it is noteworthy that, with acidic workup, 1,2-benzisothiazole 2a was obtained in excellent (92%) yield (see pages S13–14 in the SI). Thus, in the selective tuning
of the outcome of the reaction, not only the amount of the base, but
also the conditions of the workup are of high importance. Clearly,
the thermodynamic sink is the formation of 1,2-benzisothiazole 2a (see Scheme ).
Extension of the Substrate Scope of the Rearrangement of Benzothiadiazine
1,1-Dioxides (1) Leading to Benzisothiazole 1,1-Dioxides
(2) Using 2 equiv of t-BuOK
With the useful information in hand on how to control the outcome
of the rearrangements in the case of 3-acetyl-7,8-dichloro-2,4-dimethyl
substituted derivative, we turned our attention to the experimental
evaluation of the substituent effects. Therefore, variously substituted
benzothiadiazine 1,1-dioxides 1 were synthesized as starting
materials (for synthetic methods, see the SI) using the procedures described earlier.[26,38] The ring contraction of derivatives 1 to 1,2-benzisothiazoles 2 was conducted in the presence of 2 equiv of t-BuOK in THF (Scheme ), and in our standard procedure, the reaction mixture was quenched
with water. Under these conditions, compounds 1a–j (i.e., substrates bearing various 2-alkyl substituents,
various acyl or alkyl groups at position 3, and chlorine atoms both
at positions 7 and 8) were transformed smoothly and effectively to 2a–j (in case of 1g, the
hydrolysis of the trifluoroacetylamino group lowered the yield). The
synthesis of 2a was successfully scaled up to 1.2 mmol
of starting material 1a with an unchanged yield (90%).
Modifications in the aromatic substitution pattern (1k–o), however, have significantly reduced the
formation of the precipitated 1,2-benzisothiazole (2k–o) in our usual workup procedure, and the corresponding
enamides (5k–o) became the main products.
For example, when the reaction mixture of 1o was quenched
with water and extracted with DCM, the isolated mixture contained
the corresponding enamide (5o) predominantly, according
to 1HNMR (Figures S7 and S8 in
the SI), while benzisothiazole dioxide 2o was only a
minor product (12%). In case of 7-chloro-8-unsubstituted analogue 1k, cyclization to 2k did not take place under
these conditions, it could only be forced at elevated temperature.
For derivatives 1l–o, cyclization
with good to excellent yield could be fostered also at room temperature,
by quenching the reaction mixture with aqueous (1 w/w%) hydrochloric
acid instead of water. Benzothiazines 3 were not present
in these experiments.
Scheme 6
Study on the Substituent Effect on the Preparation of 1,2-Benzisothiazoles 2, Carried out with 2 equiv of t-BuOK
In the presence of the acid catalyst, the transformation of enamides 5l–o to 2l–o is easily understandable, considering that after protonation at
the most basic site, i.e., at the methylidene group of 5, carbocation I forms, which
can be attacked by the nitrogen lone pair of the sulfonamide moiety
to give II, losing finally a
proton from this nitrogen atom to result in neutral products 2l–o (Scheme ). Our DFT calculations on enamide5o fully supported the above mechanism, as shown in Figure S9 in the SI. The calculated proton affinity
of the neutral 5o is as high as 270.2 kcal/mol, and the
resulting cation Io undergoes
a ring closure via a tiny (2.3 kcal/mol) barrier (for more details
see Figure S9 in the SI) to the thermodynamically
more stable (by 8.9 kcal/mol) IIo. In case of 5a, similar proton affinity (261.8 kcal/mol)
and reaction energy (−12.9 kcal/mol) were obtained, and scan
calculations indicated a barrierless ring closure (Figure S10 in the SI). Altogether the high proton affinity
and the small barrier indicate that the proton-catalyzed ring closure
is a robust and generally applicable route for the formation of 2 for a wide range of substituents, in accordance with the
above experimental observations.
Scheme 7
Proposed Mechanism for the Formation of 1,2-Benzisothiazoles 2l–o with Acidic Work-Up
When starting from compound 1p bearing a 2-mesyl group,
a hydrolysis occurred under the usual reaction conditions, and no
product (2p) was isolated (Scheme ). In the case of 2-tosyl derivative 1q, our standard procedure resulted in the precipitation of
enamide 5q (Scheme ), isolated in 29% yield. If the same reaction mixture
was treated with aqueous (1 w/w%) hydrochloric acid, again the thermodynamic
sink, i.e., benzisothiazole 2q, was obtained in excellent
yield via the acid-catalyzed mechanism.
Scheme 8
Dependence of the Product on the Workup Conditions in the Reaction
of 3-Acetyl-2-tosyl Derivative 1q
Elaboration of the Targeted Synthesis of Benzothiazine 1,1-Dioxides
(3) Using 6 equiv of t-BuOK
When studying the effect of the substituents on the pathway leading
to benzothiazine 3a, the effects stabilizing the key
intermediates (dianion IV and anion V) are of
importance, clearly benefiting from the delocalization along the C=C—N—C=O
unit. Accordingly, when reacting 6 equiv of t-BuOK
with compounds 1a–f (all having an
acyl moiety at position 3), a mixture of products 2 and 3 could be isolated in high overall yields (Table ). A good selectivity was observed
toward benzothiazine dioxides 3a–f (entries 1–5), the only exception being 4-ethyl derivative 1b, where benzothiazine 3b was obtained as a
mixture of diastereomers, in a ratio of 1.00:0.16 (entry 2), in accord
with the expected effect of the 3-acyl group. In contrast, 2,3-dimethyl
compound 1i underwent even with 6 equiv t-BuOK a ring contraction to give 2i in a virtually identical
yield (85%, entry 6) as with 2 equiv of t-BuOK (see Scheme ). The reactions
of 3-acetyl-2-methyl derivatives bearing various substitution patterns
(other than 7,8-dichloro) on the aromatic ring, likewise with 2 equiv
of base, stopped at the enamide level. These reactions could be forced
at reflux temperature to cyclization, however, in these cases again 2 was formed instead of 3 (entries 7–9).
Table 2
Study on the Substituent Effect in
the Reaction of Compounds 1 Carried out with 6 equiv
of t-BuOK
entrya
1–3
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
2:3 ratiob
yield (%)
1
a
Me
C(O)Me
H
Cl
Cl
0.09:1.00
84c (2a+3a)
2
b
Me
C(O)Me
Me
Cl
Cl
1.00:0.88d
54c (2b+3b)
3
c
Et
C(O)Me
H
Cl
Cl
0.13:1.00
90c (2c+3c)
4
d
Bn
C(O)Me
H
Cl
Cl
0.25:1.00
62c (2d+3d)
5
f
Me
C(O)Pr
H
Cl
Cl
0.18:1.00
86c (2f+3f)
6
i
Me
Me
H
Cl
Cl
1:0
85c (2i)
7
l
Me
C(O)Me
H
OMe
Cl
1:0
74e (2l)
8
n
Me
C(O)Me
H
H
OMe
1:0
35e (2n)
9
o
Me
C(O)Me
H
H
H
1:0
59e (2o)
Reagents and reaction conditions:
substrate (0.6 mmol), t-BuOK (3.6 mmol), THF (3 mL),
30 min, then quenching with H2O.
The product ratio of the isolated
mixtures was determined by 1H NMR.
The reaction was carried out at
25 °C.
dr = 1.00:0.16.
The reaction was carried out at
reflux temperature.
Reagents and reaction conditions:
substrate (0.6 mmol), t-BuOK (3.6 mmol), THF (3 mL),
30 min, then quenching with H2O.The product ratio of the isolated
mixtures was determined by 1HNMR.The reaction was carried out at
25 °C.dr = 1.00:0.16.The reaction was carried out at
reflux temperature.The formation of compounds 3 is particularly noteworthy
since [1,3]-rearrangements involving a N–N bond cleavage and
inclusion of a C2 unit are very rare in the literature
and occur with a different mechanism.[39−41] The targeted synthesis
of 1,2-benzothiazine 1,1-dioxides 3a–f was finally conducted with 6 equiv of t-BuOK (Scheme ), by crystallization
either in DMSO (3a–c) or in THF (3d–f), yielding the products in a pure
form even without chromatographic purification. Contrary to the other
reactions taking place at room temperature, the quenched reaction
mixture of 4-ethyl derivative 1b had to be heated to
reflux to cyclize to 3b (trans–cis diastereomeric
ratio = 97:3).
Scheme 9
Targeted Synthesis of Variously Substituted 1,2-Benzothiazine 1,1-Dioxides 3
Computations
DFT calculations were carried out with the Gaussian 09 software
package.[42] The level of theory was validated
(Table S3), and the M06-2X[43] functional was used in conjunction with the 6-31+G* basis
set for conformational analysis on all reactants, transition states,
and intermediates to identify the most plausible conformers (unless
otherwise stated). For frequency calculations, ultrafine grid was
used, and free energies are reported in kcal/mol at 1 atm and 25 °C.
Free energies for gas-phase acidity were calculated with fine grid
and G(H+(gas)) = −6.28 kcal/mol[44] was used. Normal mode analysis has been performed, as well
as intrinsic reaction coordinate (IRC) calculations to verify the
transition state geometries. The possible pathways under study were
modeled using the solvation model based on density (SMD)[45] in THF. Further calculations on I were carried out using the B3LYP[46] and the ωB97X-D[47] functionals giving similar results as shown in the SI (Table S3). Stability of the wave functions was
checked and the energies of anions and the corresponding radicals
were compared to evade unnoticed electron loss. The Avogadro software[48] was used for the visualization of PMOs and CYLview[49] for geometries.
Conclusion
In this paper we presented new, switchable base-catalyzed C–N
bond forming reactions proceeding through a sequence of rearrangements.
The ring contraction of variously substituted 3,4-dihydro-2H-1,2,3-benzothiadiazine 1,1-dioxides (1) to
1,2-benzisothiazole 1,1-dioxides (2) could be achieved
in a diaza-[1,2]-Wittig reaction using 2 equiv of t-BuOK, followed by quenching with water and subsequent
crystallization. With certain substitution patterns, the formation
of enamide intermediates 5 was observed; however, when
heating or using a 1% HCl solution for quenching, the selective formation
of the thermodynamically most stable compounds 2 could
be forced. The mechanism of the facile proton-catalyzed transformation
of enamides 5 to benzisothiazoles 2 was
explored by DFT calculations. When applying a larger excess (6 equiv)
of t-BuOK in the reaction of compounds 1, a hitherto unknown diaza-[1,1,2]-Sigmatropic Rearrangements Based on
a Study of Ammonium Ylides. J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2014 ">3]-Wittig rearrangement
providing 1,2-benzothiazines (3) was identified, and
in a noteworthy way this reaction also turned out to be a practical
synthetic method (80% isolated yield for 3a). The mechanism
of these reactions was explored in a combined experimental and theoretical
study. NMR studies proved that when starting from 1a with
2 equiv of t-BuOK base, the monoanioniccyclic intermediate II (the deprotonated form
of 2a) formed predominantly. DFT calculations clearly
described the thermodynamics and the kinetics for the formation of II via a closed-shell ionic
pathway with the involvement of the ring-opened short-lived intermediate III. The formation of the
thermodynamically stable 2 from its deprotonated anion II upon reaction with water
is apparent. With a large excess (6 equiv) of the base, enamide dianion IV could be obtained according
to 1HNMR studies, and again DFT studies supported this
pathway. When quenching the reaction mixture with water, 3a and enamide 5a were predominantly formed, together
with some 2a. Under the basicconditions present, 5a transformed during the workup to 3a, in accordance
with the DFT calculations on a base-catalyzed mechanism, which was
also supported by deuterium labeling. In a noteworthy way, the final 3a:2a ratio represents the Boltzmann population
of V to III in agreement with the calculations.
In addition, the substituent effects of the base-induced (6 equiv)
rearrangement of 1,2-benzothiadiazine dioxides (1) leading
to 1,2-benzisothiazole dioxides (2) and to 1,2-benzothiazine
dioxides (3) was explored, as well. The investigation
of the substituent tolerance of these reactions revealed that while
the formation of derivatives 2 could be achieved with
most substitution patterns, the reaction leading to the formation
of compounds 3 is more sensitive. For example, replacement
of the N(3)-acyl group to N(3)-alkyl in the starting materials 1 destabilizes the enamide dianion IV, preventing the formation of 3.
Experimental Section
Melting points were determined using either a Leica Galen III melting
point apparatus; IR spectra were obtained on a Bruker ALPHA FT-IR
spectrometer in KBr pellet, and ν̃ was reported in cm–1. 1HNMR and 13CNMR spectra
were recorded on a Bruker Avance III 400 (400/100 MHz) or a Bruker
Avance III HD 600 (600/150 MHz) spectrometer equipped with a Prodigy
cryo-probehead. CDCl3 or [D6]DMSO was used as
the solvent and tetramethylsilane (TMS) as the internal standard,
and δ was reported in ppm. Structural assignments were made
with additional information from gHSQC and gHMBC experiments. A Waters
Acquity UPLC equipment coupled with a Thermo Scientific LTQ XL iontrap
MS was used to obtain mass spectroscopic data. High resolution mass
spectra were recorded on a micromass GCT or on a Bruker O-TOF MAXIS
Impact mass spectrometer coupled with a Dionex Ultimate 3000 RS system
with a diode array detector. Single crystal X-ray diffraction measurements
were carried out on a Rigaku R-AXIS SPIDER diffractometer using image
plate detection and monochromated Cu Kα radiation. The reactions
were followed by analytical thin layer chromatography on silica gel
60 F254 and HPLC-MS on a Shimadzu LC-20 HPLC utilizing
a SPD-M20A diode array detector and a LCMS-2020 spectrometer. Flask
heating blocks were used for reactions that required heating. All
unspecified reagents were purchased from commercial sources. Compounds 1a,b,[26]1i,j,[39]6b–f,[39]7a,[26]8,[26] and 9(39) (Figure ) were obtained as described
previously.
Figure 2
Further starting materials and intermediates used in this study.
Further starting materials and intermediates used in this study.
To a stirred mixture of 3-acetyl-7,8-dichloro-4-methyl-3,4-dihydro-2H-1,2,3-benzothiadiazine 1,1-dioxide (8, 500
mg, 1.6 mmol) and TEA (0.5 mL, 3.6 mmol) in DCM (8.5 mL) was added
TsCl (617 mg, 3.2 mmol) at room temperature. After 1.5 h stirring,
it was poured into ice water (30 g), and the precipitated product
was filtered. Yield 490 mg (65%); colorless crystals; mp 243–244
°C (EtOAc); 1HNMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ
= 7.96 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H; o-H),
7.67 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H; 6-H), 7.42 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H; m-H), 7.25 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H; 5-H), 5.92 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H; 4-H),
2.50 (s, 3H; p-CH3), 2.36 (s, 3H; O=C–CH3), 1.85 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H; 4-CH3); 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3):
δ = 172.9 (C=O), 147.1 (p-C), 138.7
(C4a), 135.3 (C8a), 134.4 (C7), 134.1 (ipso-C), 134.0 (C6), 130.0
(4C; o-C and m-C), 129.9 (C8), 126.9
(C5), 49.6 (C4), 21.9 (p-CH3), 20.8 (4-CH3), 20.2 (O=C-CH); IR (KBr): ν̃ = 1698 (vs; C=O), 1376 (vs;
SO2), 1169 (s; SO2); HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ Calcd for C17H17Cl2N2O5S2 462.9950; Found 462.9956.
Preparation of 1,2-Benzisothiazole 1,1-Dioxides (2)
General Procedure for the Synthesis of Compounds 2a–f,i,j
Method
A. To the mixture of 1a–d,f,i (0.60 mmol) in THF (3 mL) was added t-BuOK (1.2 mmol, 135 mg) at 25 °C and stirred for 30 min. Then,
it was quenched with water (10 mL), and THF was evaporated. After
stirring and cooling with ice water bath for 1 h, the precipitated
product was filtered and washed with water to give 2a–d,f,i. Method B. To
the solution of 1e,j (0.30 mmol) in THF
(1.5 mL) was added t-BuOK (0.60 mmol, 67 mg) at 25
°C and stirred for 30 min. Then, it was quenched with water (5
mL), and THF was evaporated. After stirring and cooling with an ice
water bath for 1 h, the precipitated product was filtered and washed
with water to give 2e,j.
To the solution of 1k (87 mg, 0.30 mmol)
in THF (1.5 mL) was added t-BuOK (0.60 mmol, 67 mg)
at 25 °C and stirred for 30 min. Then, it was quenched with water
(5 mL), and THF was evaporated. Then, the aqueous mixture was refluxed
for 1 h. After stirring and cooling with ice water bath for 1 h, the
precipitated product was filtered and washed with water. Yield 56
mg (65%); colorless crystals; mp 277–278 °C; 1HNMR (600 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ = 8.71 (s, 1H; NH),
8.05 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H; 7-H), 7.73 (dd, J = 8.5, 1.8 Hz, 1H; 5-H), 7.57 (d, J =
8.5 Hz, 1H; 4-H), 2.65 (s, 3H; 2-CH3), 1.82 (s, 3H; O=C–CH3), 1.55 (s, 3H; 3-CH3); 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ = 168.7 (O=C),
140.7 (C3a), 135.1 (C6*), 134.0 (C7a*), 133.4 (C5), 125.1 (C4), 120.8
(C7), 72.6 (C3), 25.2 (3-CH3), 23.1 (O=C-CH), 22.6 (2-CH3); IR (KBr): ν̃=, 3265 (m; NH), 1669 (m; O=C),
1298 (m; SO2), 1157 (m; SO2); HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ Calcd for C11H14ClN2O3S: 289.0408; Found
289.0408.
General Procedure for the Synthesis of Compounds 2l–o,q
To the mixture of 1l–o, 1q (0.3 mmol) in THF
(1.5 mL) was added t-BuOK (0.60 mmol, 67 mg) at 25
°C and stirred for 30 min. Then, it was quenched with aq HCl
(1 w/w%, 2.5 mL), and THF was evaporated. Upon cooling with ice water,
the precipitated product was filtered and washed with water to give
compounds 2l–o,q.
To the solution of 1a (0.60 mmol, 194 mg) in DMSO (3
mL) was added t-BuOK (3.6 mmol, 404 mg) at 25 °C
and stirred for 30 min. Then, it was quenched with water (15 mL),
and after intensive stirring for 1 h, the precipitated product was
filtered and washed with water to give 3a·HO (163 mg, 80%); colorless crystals;
mp 186–187 °C (EtOH); 1HNMR (600 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ = 8.53 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H;
NH), 7.90 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H; 6-H), 7.38 (dd, J = 8.7, 0.7 Hz, 1H; 5-H), 5.38 (ddd, J = 10.2, 8.5, 5.4 Hz, 1H; 4-H), 3.88 (dd, J = 14.7,
10.2 Hz, 1H; 3-Hax), 3.66 (dd, J = 14.7,
5.4 Hz, 1H; 3-Heq), 2.98 (s, 3H; 2-CH3), 1.92
(s, 3H; O=C–CH3); 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ = 170.0 (O=C),
139.3 (C4a), 135.7 (C8a), 133.7 (C6), 133.0 (C7), 129.8 (C5), 128.4
(C8), 50.5 (C3), 40.7 (C4), 36.2 (2-CH3), 22.9 (O=C-CH); IR (KBr): ν̃
= 3451 (m; NH), 3258 (m; NH), 1644 (vs; O=C), 1329 (vs; SO2), 1172 (s; SO2); HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ Calcd for C11H13Cl2N2O3S 323.0018;
Found 323.0017; Elemental analysis Calcd (%) for C11H12Cl2N2O3S·H2OC 38.72, H 4.14, Cl 20.78, N 8.21, S 9.40; Found C 38.53, H 4.20,
Cl 21.27, N 8.14, S 9.55. Scaled-up experiment: To the solution of 1a (3.00 mmol, 970 mg) in DMSO (15 mL) was added t-BuOK (18.0 mmol, 2020 mg) at 25 °C and stirred for 30 min.
Then, it was quenched with water (75 mL), the precipitated product
was filtered and washed with water to give 3a·HO (844 mg, 82%).
Authors: Dawid Panek; Anna Więckowska; Tomasz Wichur; Marek Bajda; Justyna Godyń; Jakub Jończyk; Kamil Mika; Jana Janockova; Ondrej Soukup; Damijan Knez; Jan Korabecny; Stanislav Gobec; Barbara Malawska Journal: Eur J Med Chem Date: 2016-09-26 Impact factor: 6.514
Authors: John A McIntosh; Pedro S Coelho; Christopher C Farwell; Z Jane Wang; Jared C Lewis; Tristan R Brown; Frances H Arnold Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2013-07-24 Impact factor: 15.336