Literature DB >> 33382151

Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer assessment: Current status and future directions.

Sandy Van Nieuwenhove1, Julien Van Damme2, Anwar R Padhani3, Vincent Vandecaveye4, Bertrand Tombal2, Joris Wuts1,5, Vassiliki Pasoglou1, Frederic E Lecouvet1.   

Abstract

Over the past decade, updated definitions for the different stages of prostate cancer and risk for distant disease, along with the advent of new therapies, have remarkably changed the management of patients. The two expectations from imaging are accurate staging and appropriate assessment of disease response to therapies. Modern, next-generation imaging (NGI) modalities, including whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) and nuclear medicine (most often prostate-specific membrane antigen [PSMA] positron emission tomography [PET]/computed tomography [CT]) bring added value to these imaging tasks. WB-MRI has proven its superiority over bone scintigraphy (BS) and CT for the detection of distant metastasis, also providing reliable evaluations of disease response to treatment. Comparison of the effectiveness of WB-MRI and molecular nuclear imaging techniques with regard to indications and the definition of their respective/complementary roles in clinical practice is ongoing. This paper illustrates the evolution of WB-MRI imaging protocols, defines the current state-of-the art, and highlights the latest developments and future challenges. The paper presents and discusses WB-MRI indications in the care pathway of men with prostate cancer in specific key situations: response assessment of metastatic disease, "all in one" cancer staging, and oligometastatic disease.
© 2020 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  prostate cancer; prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography/computed tomography; response assessment to treatment; whole-body magnetic resonance imaging; whole-body magnetic resonance imaging indications; whole-body magnetic resonance imaging technique

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33382151     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  5 in total

1.  [Is contrast medium essential in the initial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnosis of prostate cancer?]

Authors:  J P Radtke; L Schimmöller
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  The role for MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation in the continuum of prostate cancer care.

Authors:  Joseph J Busch
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Twenty Years On: RECIST as a Biomarker of Response in Solid Tumours an EORTC Imaging Group - ESOI Joint Paper.

Authors:  Laure Fournier; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Daniele Regge; Daniela-Elena Oprea-Lager; Melvin D'Anastasi; Luc Bidaut; Tobias Bäuerle; Egesta Lopci; Giovanni Cappello; Frederic Lecouvet; Marius Mayerhoefer; Wolfgang G Kunz; Joost J C Verhoeff; Damiano Caruso; Marion Smits; Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann; Sofia Gourtsoyianni; Regina Beets-Tan; Emanuele Neri; Nandita M deSouza; Christophe M Deroose; Caroline Caramella
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Radiotherapy to the Primary Tumor: The First Step of a Tailored Therapy in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Matteo Ferro; Felice Crocetto; Giuseppe Lucarelli; Elena Lievore; Biagio Barone
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-16

Review 5.  Imaging of treatment response and minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma: state of the art WB-MRI and PET/CT.

Authors:  Frederic E Lecouvet; Marie-Christiane Vekemans; Thomas Van Den Berghe; Koenraad Verstraete; Thomas Kirchgesner; Souad Acid; Jacques Malghem; Joris Wuts; Jens Hillengass; Vincent Vandecaveye; François Jamar; Olivier Gheysens; Bruno C Vande Berg
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 2.199

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.