| Literature DB >> 33381689 |
Armando Machado1, Paulo Guilhardi2, Marcelo S Caetano3, Francisco J Silva4.
Abstract
Eckard and Lattal (2020) summarized the behavioristic view of hypothetical constructs and theories, and then, in a novel and timely manner, applied this view to a critique of internal clock models of temporal control. In our three-part commentary, we aim to contribute to the authors' discussion by first expanding upon their view of the positive contributions afforded by constructs and theories. We then refine and question their view of the perils of reifying constructs and assigning them causal properties. Finally, we suggest to behavior analysts four rules of conduct for dealing with mediational theories: tolerate constructs proposed with sufficient reason; consider them seriously, both empirically and conceptually; develop alternative, behavior-analytic models with overlapping empirical domains; and contrast the various models. Through variation and selection, behavioral science will evolve. © Association for Behavior Analysis International 2020, corrected publication 2020.Keywords: Behavior analysis; Hypothetical constructs; Internal clock models; Mediational theories; Temporal control
Year: 2020 PMID: 33381689 PMCID: PMC7724007 DOI: 10.1007/s40614-020-00272-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Perspect Behav Sci ISSN: 2520-8969