Giulia Tasca1, Maria Vittoria Dieci1,2, Zora Baretta3, Giovanni Faggioni1, Marco Montagna4, Maria Ornella Nicoletto1, Fedro Alessandro Peccatori5, Valentina Guarneri1,2, Nicoletta Colombo5,6. 1. Medical Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy. 2. Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy. 3. Oncology Unit, Hospital of Montecchio Maggiore, Montecchio Maggiore, Vicenza, Italy. 4. Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy. 5. Istituto Europeo di Oncologia - IRCCS, Milano, Italy. 6. University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the clinico-pathological characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with synchronous or metachronous breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with synchronous or metachronous BC and OC were retrospectively identified at two large cancer centers. Clinico-pathological characteristics, BRCA1/2 status and follow-up data were gathered. Patients were classified according to the first cancer diagnosis in the following groups: Breast Cancer first, Ovarian Cancer first, Synchronous Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Overall survival (OS) was calculated as the time interval between each cancer diagnosis to death or last follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, 270 patients were included: n = 194 (72%) in BC first group, n = 51 (19%) in OC first, and n = 25 (9%) in synchronous. BRCA status was available for 182 (67.4%) patients and 112 (62%) harbored pathogenetic mutations. BC first group included more frequently patients with BRCA mutation, triple negative BC phenotype and more aggressive OC features. Median time between the two diagnosis was longer in BC first group vs OC first group (95 vs 68 months, p = 0.021). A total of 105 OS events occurred, mostly related to OC (70.5%). We observed no differences in terms of OS according to the first cancer diagnosis. Age >50 years and advanced OC stage were negative independent prognostic factors for OS from the first diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients with BC and OC, survival was dominated by OC related mortality. These data may be useful to plan and carry out adequate and timely surveillance programs and preventive measures.
PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the clinico-pathological characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with synchronous or metachronous breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with synchronous or metachronous BC and OC were retrospectively identified at two large cancer centers. Clinico-pathological characteristics, BRCA1/2 status and follow-up data were gathered. Patients were classified according to the first cancer diagnosis in the following groups: Breast Cancer first, Ovarian Cancer first, Synchronous Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Overall survival (OS) was calculated as the time interval between each cancer diagnosis to death or last follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, 270 patients were included: n = 194 (72%) in BC first group, n = 51 (19%) in OC first, and n = 25 (9%) in synchronous. BRCA status was available for 182 (67.4%) patients and 112 (62%) harbored pathogenetic mutations. BC first group included more frequently patients with BRCA mutation, triple negative BC phenotype and more aggressive OC features. Median time between the two diagnosis was longer in BC first group vs OC first group (95 vs 68 months, p = 0.021). A total of 105 OS events occurred, mostly related to OC (70.5%). We observed no differences in terms of OS according to the first cancer diagnosis. Age >50 years and advanced OC stage were negative independent prognostic factors for OS from the first diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients with BC and OC, survival was dominated by OC related mortality. These data may be useful to plan and carry out adequate and timely surveillance programs and preventive measures.
Authors: Jacob McGee; Vasily Giannakeas; Beth Karlan; Jan Lubinski; Jacek Gronwald; Barry Rosen; John McLaughlin; Harvey Risch; Ping Sun; William D Foulkes; Susan L Neuhausen; Joanne Kotsopoulos; Steven A Narod Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2017-03-14 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Wen-Shiung Liou; Chad A Hamilton; Michael K Cheung; Kathryn Osann; Teri A Longacre; Nelson N Teng; Amreen Husain; Frederick M Dirbas; John K Chan Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2006-03-29 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Susan M Domchek; Komal Jhaveri; Sujata Patil; Jill E Stopfer; Clifford Hudis; Jacquelyn Powers; Zsofia Stadler; Laura Goldstein; Noah Kauff; Mustafa Khasraw; Kenneth Offit; Katherine L Nathanson; Mark Robson Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-11-16 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Leendert H Zaaijer; Helena C van Doorn; Marian J E Mourits; Marc van Beurden; Joanne A de Hullu; Muriel A Adank; Luc R C W van Lonkhuijzen; Hans F A Vasen; Brigitte F M Slangen; Katja N Gaarenstroom; Ronald P Zweemer; Peggy M L H Vencken; Caroline Seynaeve; Mieke Kriege Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2016-10-18 Impact factor: 7.640