| Literature DB >> 33381214 |
Zhiyong Li1,2,3, Jianliang Li4, Fengrong Zhang5, Na Zhu2, Zijun Sha2, Dan Li6, Ya Tu7, Jincai Hou6.
Abstract
Sechang-Zhixie-San (SCZX) is an ancient prescription used for pediatric diarrhea by the Yi people in China, which consists of Rodgersia sambucifolia Hemsley (known as Yantuo and abbreviated as YT) and Bentonite (BN). Now, it is also a Chinese patent medicine used in the clinic to treat infantile diarrhea. Besides evaluating the antidiarrheal effect of SCZX on diarrhea mice induced by Folium Sennae, the purpose of this study is to outline the characteristics of the antidiarrheal effect and reveal the potential mechanisms of SCZX through the analysis of the mechanism and active components of YT via network pharmacology and molecular docking, combined with the research progress of BN obtained from the literature. SCZX (3.12 and 12.48 g/kg) effectively inhibited diarrhea in mice, significantly lowering the loose stool rate (LSR), loose stool level (LSL), and loose stool index (LSI). Using network pharmacology, the "herb-compound-target-pathway-pharmacological action" network was mapped to indicate the antidiarrheal mechanism of YT. And the docking results revealed that 4 components of YT including quercetin, geranyl-1-O-α-L-arabinopyranosyl-(1 ⟶ 6)-β-D-glucopyranoside, 3α-O-(E)-p-hydroxy-cinnamoyl-olean-12-en-27-oic acid, and daucosterol showed significant docking activities with STAT3, EGFR, and SLC10A2, involving 11 pathways such as Th17 cell differentiation, Jak-STAT signaling pathway, ErbB signaling pathway, and HIF-1 signaling pathway. According to our research results and literature reports, the antidiarrheal could be summarized into five aspects: inhibiting intestinal inflammation, acting as a barrier to the intestinal mucosal, regulating water and ion transport, involving the purification of intestinal microorganisms, and intestinal transmission, which might be dependent on multiple proteins and intervention in multiple pathways.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33381214 PMCID: PMC7749774 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8880298
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Classification of stools.
| Level | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stain diameter (cm) | <1 | 1–1.9 | 2–3 | >3 |
Figure 1Effects of SCZX on stool parameters of mice with diarrhea induced by Sennae Folium. Note. Diarrhea rate (DR, %) (a); loose stool rate (LSR, %) (b); loose stool level (LSL, %) (c); loose stool index (LSI) (d); P < 0.01 versus model group; N = 10.
Figure 2Effects of SCZX on small intestine propulsion rate in mice with diarrhea (N = 10).
Figure 3PPI network of YT and diarrhea. Note. Potential targets and PPI network of YT in treating diarrhea (a); PPI network of diarrhea (b). PPI: protein and protein interaction. Circular node size represents the degree value, and the redder a node is, the larger its degree value is. The edges represent the relationships between nodes, and the thicker the edge, the larger the combined score value.
Figure 4Hub proteins and cluster networks of YT. Note. Interactive core targets of YT in the treatment of diarrhea (a); significant modules in PPI network of YT (b).
Figure 5Gene ontology enrichment of cluster networks A and B. Note. Biological process of CNA (a); cellular component of CNA (b); molecular function of CNA (c); biological process of CNB (d); cellular component of CNB (e); molecular function of CNB (f).
Figure 6KEGG enrichment of CNA and CNB.
KEGG pathways of YT in the treatment of diarrhea.
| No. | Term | Description | Gene symbols | Attribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | hsa04659 | Th17 cell differentiation | IKBKB, IL2, STAT1, | CNA |
| 2 | hsa04062 | Chemokine signaling pathway | IKBKB, CXCL8, STAT1, | CNA |
| 3 | hsa04630 | Jak-STAT signaling pathway | IL2, STAT1, | CNA |
| 4 | hsa04068 | FoxO signaling pathway | AKT1, | CNB |
| 5 | hsa04014 | Ras signaling pathway | AKT1, | CNB |
| 6 | hsa04066 | HIF-1 signaling pathway | AKT1, | CNB |
| 7 | hsa04072 | Phospholipase D signaling pathway | AKT1, | CNB |
| 8 | hsa04012 | ErbB signaling pathway | AKT1, | CNB |
| 9 | hsa04510 | Focal adhesion | AKT1, | CNB |
| 10 | hsa04010 | MAPK signaling pathway | AKT1, | CNB |
| 11 | hsa04810 | Regulation of actin cytoskeleton |
| CNB |
| 12 | hsa04060 | Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction |
| CNB |
| 13 | hsa04976 | Bile secretion | CYP3A4, | Unclustered |
Figure 7The “herb-component-target-pathway” network of YT-treating diarrhea. Note. The triangle node represents the component of YT. The orange node represents the component with favorable human OB, IA, and DL; the blue node represents the component with DL and favorable human OB or IA; the green node represents the component with only DL properties; the violet node represents the component with human OB or IA; the gray node represents the component without any of the above properties. The pink diamond node represents the target protein and the yellow rectangle node represents the pathway.
Information of active compounds and potential targets.
| Id | Compounds | IA | OB | DL | Gene symbol |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YT01 | Daucosterol | + | − | + | STAT3, EGFR, OPRM1, KIT, TNF, SLC, CYP3A4 |
| YT02 | (E)-3, 7-Dimethyl-1-O-[ | − | − | − | STAT3, TNF, BTK, SLC5A1 |
| YT03 | 7-Dimethyl-1-O-[ | − | − | − | STAT3, EGFR, VEGFA, TNF, LCK, BTK, ACE, SLC5A1 |
| YT04 | Geranyl-1-O- | − | − | + | STAT3, EGFR, VEGFA, KIT, TNF, LCK, BTK, ACE, SLC5A1, SLC10A2 |
| YT05 | Geranyl-1-O- | − | − | + | STAT3, EGFR, VEGFA, KIT, TNF, ACE, SLC5A1, SLC10A2 |
| YT06 | 3 | − | − | + | STAT3, EGFR, VEGFA, KIT, TNF, LCK, BTK, ACE, SLC5A1 |
| YT07 | 3-O-Galloyl-epicatechin | − | − | + | STAT3 |
| YT08 | 1-O-Galloyl- | − | − | + | STAT3, OPRM1, VEGFA, ACE, VDR, ABCB11 |
| YT09 | Anethole | + | + | + | STAT3, EGFR, JAK3, ACE |
| YT10 | Myristic acid | + | − | − | VDR |
| YT11 | 3-Methoxy-4-O-D-glucopyranosyl- phenylpropane-7, 8, 9-triol | − | − | + | EGFR, LCK, ACE, SLC5A1 |
| YT12 | Bergenin | + | − | + | EGFR |
| YT13 | 4-O-Galloylbergenin | + | − | − | EGFR, NRAS, VEGFA |
| YT14 | 11-O-Galloylbergenin | + | − | − | EGFR, NRAS, VEGFA |
| YT15 | Quercetin | + | − | + | EGFR, PIK3R1 |
| YT16 | 3, 4-Dihydroxybenzoic acid | + | + | + | EGFR, OPRM1, LCK |
| YT17 | Benzene, 1, 2-dimethoxy-4-(1-propenyl)- | + | + | + | EGFR, JAK3 |
| YT18 | Rutin | + | − | − | OPRM1 |
| YT19 | Ethyl gallate | + | + | + | ADAM17 |
| YT20 | Ergosterol | + | − | + | JAK3, OPRM1, VDR |
| YT21 | Geranyl 6-O- | − | − | + | SLC5A1 |
| YT22 | Carvacrol | + | + | + | JAK3 |
| YT23 | 3, 3′, 4′, 5, 7-pentahydroxyflavan | + | − | − | VEGFA, KIT, LCK |
| YT24 | 3-O- | + | − | + | VEGFA, ACE |
| YT25 | Eugenol | + | − | + | VEGFA, JAK3 |
| YT26 |
| + | − | + | TNF, VDR, CYP3A4 |
| YT27 | 6-O-Galloyl-D-glucose | + | − | + | TNF, ACE |
| YT28 | Oleanolic acid | + | + | + | TNF |
| YT29 | 3, 5-Dimethoxy-4-O- | − | − | − | LCK, BTK, ACE, SLC5A1 |
| YT30 | Arbutin | − | − | + | LCK, SLC5A1 |
| YT31 | Stearic acid | − | − | + | ACE, VDR |
| YT32 | Citronellal | + | + | + | ACE |
| YT33 | Hexadecanoic acid | + | − | − | VDR |
| YT34 | (−)-limonene | + | + | + | VDR |
| YT35 | Lauric acid | + | − | + | VDR |
| YT36 | Geranyl-1-O- | − | − | + | TNF, |
Note. OB : human oral bioavailability; IA : human intestinal absorption; DL : drug-likeness.
Affinity of optimal docking conformation of the component and macromolecule.
| Gene name | PDB ID | Compound | Affinity (kcal/mol) |
|---|---|---|---|
| STAT3 | 6NJS | Daucosterol | −7.5 |
| STAT3 | 6NJS | Anethole | −4.5 |
| STAT3 | 6NJS | Geranyl-1-O- | −7.0 |
| STAT3 | 6NJS | 3 | −8.1 |
| EGFR | 5UG9 | Daucosterol | −9.1 |
| EGFR | 5UG9 | Anethole | −6.1 |
| EGFR | 5UG9 | Quercetin | −8.7 |
| EGFR | 5UG9 | 3,4-Dihydroxybenzoic acid | −5.9 |
| EGFR | 5UG9 | Benzene, 1, 2-dimethoxy-4-(1-propenyl)- | −6.7 |
| EGFR | 5UG9 | Geranyl-1-O- | −8.4 |
| EGFR | 5UG9 | 3 | −9.1 |
| EGFR | 5UG9 | 3-Methoxy-4-O-D-glucopyranosyl- phenylpropane-7, 8, 9-triol | −7.0 |
| SLC10A2 | 3ZUY | Geranyl-1-O- | −9.2 |
Figure 83D diagram of the optimal docking position of small molecule-proteins. Note. Best docking position of daucosterol and STAT3 (a); geranyl-1-O-α-L-arabinopyranosyl-(1 ⟶ 6)-β-D-glucopyranoside and STAT3 (b); 3α-O-(E)-p-hydroxy-cinnamoyl-olean-12-en-27-oic acid and STAT3 (c); anethole and STAT3 (d); daucosterol and EGFR (e); geranyl-1-O-α-L-arabinopyranosyl-(1 ⟶ 6)-β-D-glucopyranoside and EGFR (f); 3α-O-(E)-p-hydroxy-cinnamoyl-olean-12-en-27-oic acid and EGFR (g); anethole and EGFR (h); 3-methoxy-4-O-D-glucopyranosyl- phenylpropane-7, 8, 9-triol and EGFR (i); quercetin and EGFR (j); 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid and EGFR (k); benzene, 1, 2-dimethoxy-4-(1-propenyl)- and EGFR (l); geranyl-1-O-α-L-arabinopyranosyl-(1 ⟶ 6)-β-D-glucopyranoside and SLC10A2 (m).
Figure 9Potential active ingredients, mechanisms, and pharmacodynamic characteristics of SCZX.