Literature DB >> 33380949

Radiographic Humerus Union Measurement (RHUM) Demonstrates High Inter- and Intraobserver Reliability in Assessing Humeral Shaft Fracture Healing.

Anthony V Christiano1, Abraham M Goch2, Christopher J Burke3, Philipp Leucht3, Sanjit R Konda3,4, Kenneth A Egol3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Orthopedic surgeons use radiographs to determine degrees of fracture healing, guide progression of clinical care, and assist in determining weight bearing and removal of immobilization. However, no gold standard exists to determine the progression of healing of humeral shaft fractures treated non-operatively.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a scale comparable to the modified Radiographic Union Score for Tibial (RUST) fractures applied to non-operatively treated humeral shaft fractures can increase interobserver reliability in determining fracture healing.
METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken by three orthopedic traumatologists and one musculoskeletal radiologist, who evaluated 50 sets of anteroposterior and lateral radiographs, presented at random, of non-operatively treated humeral shaft fractures at various stages of healing from 17 patients. The radiographs were scored using a modified RUST scale called the Radiographic Humerus Union Measurement (RHUM). Observers were blinded to the time from injury. After a 4-week washout period, observers again scored the same radiographs. Observers classified each fracture as either healed or not healed based on the combination of radiographs. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the RHUM were determined using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Interobserver reliability of determining a healed fracture was calculated using Cohen's kappa (κ) statistics. A receiver operator characteristic curve was conducted to determine the RHUM score predictive of a fracture being considered healed.
RESULTS: ICC demonstrated almost perfect interobserver reliability (ICC, 0.838; ICC 95% CI, 0.765 to 0.896) and intraobserver reliability (ICC range, 0.822 to 0.948) of the RHUM. κ demonstrated substantial agreement between observers in considering a fracture healed (κ = 0.647). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve demonstrated that a RHUM of 10 or higher is an excellent predictor of the observer considering the fracture healed (area under the ROC curve = 0.946, specificity = 0.957, 95% CI specificity, 0.916 to 0.979).
CONCLUSIONS: This cortical scoring system has excellent interobserver reliability in humeral shaft fractures treated non-operatively. Consistent with previous cortical scoring systems, a RHUM score of 10 or above can be considered radiographically healed. © Hospital for Special Surgery 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fracture healing; humerus; humerus fractures; radiographic union

Year:  2019        PMID: 33380949      PMCID: PMC7749905          DOI: 10.1007/s11420-019-09680-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HSS J        ISSN: 1556-3316


  19 in total

1.  Development of the radiographic union score for tibial fractures for the assessment of tibial fracture healing after intramedullary fixation.

Authors:  Daniel B Whelan; Mohit Bhandari; David Stephen; Hans Kreder; Michael D McKee; Rad Zdero; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2010-03

2.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  The effect of autologous concentrated bone-marrow grafting on the healing of femoral shaft non-unions after locked intramedullary nailing.

Authors:  João Antonio Matheus Guimarães; Maria Eugenia L Duarte; Marco B Cury Fernandes; Verônica F Vianna; Tito H N Rocha; Danielle C Bonfim; Priscila L Casado; Isabel C C do Val Guimarães; Luis G Coca Velarde; Hélio S Dutra; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.586

4.  Functional bracing for the treatment of fractures of the humeral diaphysis.

Authors:  A Sarmiento; J B Zagorski; G A Zych; L L Latta; C A Capps
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Accuracy of radiologic assessment of tibial shaft fracture union in humans.

Authors:  R R Hammer; S Hammerby; B Lindholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Changes in serum levels of TNF-alpha, IL-6, OPG, RANKL and their correlation with radiographic and clinical assessment in fragility fractures and high energy fractures.

Authors:  M G Giganti; F Liuni; M Celi; E Gasbarra; R Zenobi; I Tresoldi; A Modesti; R Bei; U Tarantino
Journal:  J Biol Regul Homeost Agents       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.711

7.  Resonant frequency analysis of the tibia as a measure of fracture healing.

Authors:  S S Tower; R K Beals; P J Duwelius
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Nonoperative fracture treatment in the modern era.

Authors:  Charles M Court-Brown; Stuart Aitken; Thomas W Hamilton; Louise Rennie; Ben Caesar
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2010-09

9.  Diaphyseal humerus fractures: natural history and occurrence of nonunion.

Authors:  D A Foulk; R M Szabo
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.390

10.  Trial to re-evaluate ultrasound in the treatment of tibial fractures (TRUST): a multicenter randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Jason W Busse; Mohit Bhandari; Thomas A Einhorn; James D Heckman; Kwok-Sui Leung; Emil Schemitsch; Paul Tornetta; Stephen D Walter; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.