Literature DB >> 33380550

Efficacy and Safety of DWJ1252 Compared With Gasmotin Treatment: Once Met 3 Times Tablets.

Jae Hak Kim1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33380550      PMCID: PMC7786092          DOI: 10.5056/jnm20260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 2093-0879            Impact factor:   4.924


× No keyword cloud information.
Previously, functional dyspepsia (FD) was divided into 3 categories of reflux-like, ulcer-like, and dysmotility-like FD.[1] A paradigm shift has occurred in FD, subdividing FD into epigastric pain syndrome and post-prandial discomfort.[2] According to the American and Canadian guidelines of FD management, in Helicobactyer pylori-positive patients, H. pylori eradication therapy should be considered the first-line treatment.[3] However, considering the high prevalence of H. pylori in Korea, H. pylori eradication therapy is recommended when proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and prokinetics are not effective.[4] Meta-analysis shows significant but modest efficacy of H. pylori eradication on long-term resolution of FD symptoms.[5] H. pylori eradication therapy can be applied in cases where PPIs and prokinetics are not effective, or in young patients with chronic dyspeptic symptoms in Korea. In contrast, in patients with FD who do not respond to PPIs, H. pylori eradication therapy, or tricyclic antidepressant therapy, treatment with prokinetics should be tried according to the American and Canadian guidelines. Where does this difference come from? Postprandial fullness is the most troublesome symptom in FD patients, aggravated by a meal.[6] Therefore, prokinetics, improving gastric emptying, relaxing the fundus, and increasing gastric accommodation, may have a role in the treatment of FD.[7] However, most studies on prokinetics had significant and unexplained heterogeneity. Small studies showed positive results but larger trials could not demonstrate significant efficacy.[3] In the Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, a randomized clinical trial of 119 patients with FD (by Rome III criteria) conducted by Park et al[8] evaluated the efficacy and safety of once-a-day DWJ1252 (Gasmotin SR; Daewoong Pharm Co, LTD, Seoul, Korea), a sustained-release formulation of Gasmotin, compared with Gasmotin 3-times-a-day, in patients with FD. The primary endpoint was the change in gastrointestinal symptom (GIS) scores from baseline, assessed by GIS questionnaires on a 5-point Likert scale after 4 weeks of treatment. The study showed that the GIS scores at week 4 were significantly reduced –10.04 ± 4.45 points in the Gasmotin SR group and –10.86 ± 5.53 in the Gasmotin 3-times-a-day group (P < 0.001). The GIS changes from baseline were not different between the 2 groups (difference, 0.82 points; 95% CI, –1.17 to 2.81; P = 0.643). The other outcomes of interest demonstrated that dyspepsia-specific quality of life scores significantly increased in the 2 groups after week 4 of treatment (+63.82 ± 82.91 and +67.12 ± 81.11, P < 0.001), with no difference between the test and control groups (P > 0.99). Gasmotin SR has a diffusion controlled-release system, which means the release rate is limited by the diffusion of the drug through a water-insoluble membrane. Frequent medication-taking leads to treatment non-adherence. The extended-release formulation of a drug can improve treatment adherence in patients with chronic diseases[9] and drug compliance also matters in short-term disease treatment.[10] Another controlled-release tablet, UI05MSP015CT (Gastiin CR; Korea United Pharm Inc, Seoul, Korea), is also available in Korea. A similar study was conducted with 138 patients with FD who received either UI05MSP015CT or mosapride 3-times-a-day as controls.[11] It showed that changes in GIS scores at week 4 were –9.69 ± 6.44 in the UI05MSP015CT group and –10.01 ± 5.92 in the control group. The mean difference in GIS changes between the groups was 0.33 (95% CI, –1.75 to 2.41; P = 0.755). A study by Park et al[8] regarding the efficacy of Gasmotin SR in FD lacked a placebo arm. In a randomized clinical trial of FD, the rate of response to the placebo was 30% to 60%.[12,13] Since the negative results of a placebo-controlled, randomized study of mosapride were reported,[12] mosapride was examined in FD and was not shown to be more effective than placebo in a meta-analysis of 13 randomized trials.[7] For this reason, the clinical effectiveness of mosapride in patients with FD has been evaluated by the comparison to other drugs without a placebo group.[14] Even though Gasmotin SR is a once-a-day tablet, better compliance with this drug could not be demonstrated due to the limitation of blinding. However, this study suggested that Gasmotin SR may achieve better compliance than conventional Gasmotin.
  14 in total

1.  Large-scale randomized clinical study on functional dyspepsia treatment with mosapride or teprenone: Japan Mosapride Mega-Study (JMMS).

Authors:  Michio Hongo; Shigeru Harasawa; Tetsuya Mine; Iwao Sasaki; Kei Matsueda; Motoyasu Kusano; Nobuyoshi Hanyu; Koji Nakada; Chikashi Shibata
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.029

Review 2.  The impact of medication regimen factors on adherence to chronic treatment: a review of literature.

Authors:  Karen S Ingersoll; Jessye Cohen
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2008-01-19

3.  Mosapride treatment for functional dyspepsia: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chang Seok Bang; Jong Hyeok Kim; Gwang Ho Baik; Hyo Sun Kim; Sang Hyun Park; Eun Jin Kim; Jin Bong Kim; Ki Tae Suk; Jai Hoon Yoon; Yeon Soo Kim; Dong Joon Kim
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.029

Review 4.  Functional gastroduodenal disorders.

Authors:  Jan Tack; Nicholas J Talley; Michael Camilleri; Gerald Holtmann; Pinjin Hu; Juan-R Malagelada; Vincenzo Stanghellini
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Dose finding study of mosapride in functional dyspepsia: a placebo-controlled, randomized study.

Authors:  B I Hallerbäck; G Bommelaer; E Bredberg; M Campbell; M Hellblom; K Lauritsen; M Wienbeck; L-L Holmgren
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 8.171

Review 6.  Initial management strategies for dyspepsia.

Authors:  B Delaney; A C Ford; D Forman; P Moayyedi; M Qume
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-10-19

Review 7.  Non-ulcer dyspepsia: myths and realities.

Authors:  N J Talley
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 8.171

Review 8.  Clinical Practice Guidelines for Functional Dyspepsia in Korea.

Authors:  Jung Hwan Oh; Joong Goo Kwon; Hye-Kyung Jung; Chung Hyun Tae; Kyung Ho Song; Seung Joo Kang; Sung Eun Kim; Kyoungwon Jung; Joon Sung Kim; Jong Kyu Park; Ki Bae Bang; Myong Ki Baeg; Jeong Eun Shin; Cheol Min Shin; Ju Yup Lee; Hyun Chul Lim
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 4.924

9.  Prokinetics for functional dyspepsia.

Authors:  Rapat Pittayanon; Yuhong Yuan; Natasha P Bollegala; Reena Khanna; Grigorios I Leontiadis; Paul Moayyedi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-18

10.  Efficacy and Safety of UI05MSP015CT in Functional Dyspepsia: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Hyuk Yoon; Dong Ho Lee; Yong-Hyun Lee; Ju-Cheol Jeong; Soo Teik Lee; Myung-Gyu Choi; Seong Woo Jeon; Ki-Nam Shim; Gwang Ho Baik; Jae Gyu Kim; Jeong Seop Moon; In-Kyung Sung; Sang Kil Lee; Poong-Lyul Rhee; Hwoon-Yong Jung; Bong Eun Lee; Hyun Soo Kim; Sang Gyun Kim; Kee Myung Lee; Jae Kyu Seong; Jin Seok Jang; Jong-Jae Park
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 4.519

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.