Literature DB >> 33380486

Study protocol: a mixed-methods realist evaluation of the Universal Health Visiting Pathway in Scotland.

Lawrence Doi1, Kathleen Morrison2, Ruth Astbury3, Jane Eunson4, Margaret A Horne5, Ruth Jepson2, Louise Marryat6, Rachel Ormston4, Rachael Wood7,8.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The growing political emphasis on the early years reflects the importance of these formative years of life. Health visitors in the UK are uniquely positioned to improve health outcomes for children and families and to reduce health inequalities. Recently, there has been a policy change in Scotland in an attempt to enhance the delivery of the universal health visiting service. This study aims to examine the extent to which the enhanced Universal Health Visiting Pathway is implemented and delivered across Scotland and to assess any associated impacts. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A mixed-methods study incorporating four methodological components and uses realist evaluation as the overall conceptual framework. It comprises three phases (1) initial programme theory development; (2) programme theory validation and (3) programme theory refinement. The programme theory validation will use interview and focus group data of parents and health visitors, and conduct a case note review at five study sites. It also involves a national survey of parents and health visitors and routine data analysis of existing secondary data. The analyses of the ensuing qualitative and quantitative data will be carried out using a convergent mixed-methods approach to ensure continuous triangulation of multiple data. The findings of the evaluation will provide contextually relevant understanding of how the Universal Health Visiting Pathway works and evidence the impact of increased investments in health visiting in Scotland. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol has been approved by the School of Health in Social Science Research Ethics Committee, University of Edinburgh. Additional approvals have been granted/will be sought from the Public Benefit and Privacy Panel for health and social care in Scotland for the case note review,survey and routine data analysis elements of the evaluation. The findings will be prepared as reports to the funders and presented at conferences. It will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  community child health; health policy; maternal medicine; public health

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33380486      PMCID: PMC7780504          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


  5 in total

1.  Fair society, healthy lives.

Authors:  M Marmot; R Bell
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 2.427

Review 2.  Health Visiting--the end of a UK wide service?

Authors:  Robert Alan James Hoskins
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  How do you modernize a health service? A realist evaluation of whole-scale transformation in london.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Charlotte Humphrey; Jane Hughes; Fraser Macfarlane; Ceri Butler; Ray Pawson
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Bringing critical realism to nursing practice: Roy Bhaskar's contribution.

Authors:  Lynne Williams; Jo Rycroft-Malone; Christopher R Burton
Journal:  Nurs Philos       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 1.279

5.  Realist evaluation of an enhanced health visiting programme.

Authors:  Lawrence Doi; Ruth Jepson; Samantha Hardie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  A Low-Cost Method for Understanding How Nature-Based Early Learning and Childcare Impacts Children's Health and Wellbeing.

Authors:  Oliver Traynor; Anne Martin; Avril Johnstone; Nai Rui Chng; Jessica Kenny; Paul McCrorie
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-23

Review 2.  Variation in health visiting contacts for children in England: cross-sectional analysis of the 2-2½ year review using administrative data (Community Services Dataset, CSDS).

Authors:  Caroline Fraser; Katie Harron; Jane Barlow; Samantha Bennett; Geoffrey Woods; Jenny Shand; Sally Kendall; Jenny Woodman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.