Literature DB >> 33380471

Dissecting the Roles of Supervised and Unsupervised Learning in Perceptual Discrimination Judgments.

Yonatan Loewenstein1,2,3,4, Ofri Raviv5, Merav Ahissar5,6.   

Abstract

Our ability to compare sensory stimuli is a fundamental cognitive function, which is known to be affected by two biases: choice bias, which reflects a preference for a given response, and contraction bias, which reflects a tendency to perceive stimuli as similar to previous ones. To test whether both reflect supervised processes, we designed feedback protocols aimed to modify them and tested them in human participants. Choice bias was readily modifiable. However, contraction bias was not. To compare these results to those predicted from an optimal supervised process, we studied a noise-matched optimal linear discriminator (Perceptron). In this model, both biases were substantially modified, indicating that the "resilience" of contraction bias to feedback does not maximize performance. These results suggest that perceptual discrimination is a hierarchical, two-stage process. In the first, stimulus statistics are learned and integrated with representations in an unsupervised process that is impenetrable to external feedback. In the second, a binary judgment, learned in a supervised way, is applied to the combined percept.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The seemingly effortless process of inferring physical reality from the sensory input is highly influenced by previous knowledge, leading to perceptual biases. Two common ones are contraction bias (the tendency to perceive stimuli as similar to previous ones) and choice bias (the tendency to prefer a specific response). Combining human psychophysical experiments with computational modeling we show that they reflect two different learning processes. Contraction bias reflects unsupervised learning of stimuli statistics, whereas choice bias results from supervised or reinforcement learning. This dissociation reveals a hierarchical, two-stage process. The first, where stimuli statistics are learned and integrated with representations, is unsupervised. The second, where a binary judgment is applied to the combined percept, is learned in a supervised way.
Copyright © 2021 Loewenstein et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contraction bias; frequency discrimination; perception; supervised learning; unsupervised learning

Year:  2020        PMID: 33380471      PMCID: PMC7842757          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0757-20.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  33 in total

1.  Effects of biased feedback on learning and deciding in a vernier discrimination task.

Authors:  M H Herzog; M Fahle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: a commentary.

Authors:  S A Klein
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

3.  The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain.

Authors:  F ROSENBLATT
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1958-11       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Perceptual enhancement of contrast by attention.

Authors:  Stefan Treue
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Flexible control of mutual inhibition: a neural model of two-interval discrimination.

Authors:  Christian K Machens; Ranulfo Romo; Carlos D Brody
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-02-18       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Reverse feedback induces position and orientation specific changes.

Authors:  Michael H Herzog; Knut R F Ewald; Frouke Hermens; Manfred Fahle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-07-17       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Serial Dependence in Perceptual Decisions Is Reflected in Activity Patterns in Primary Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Elexa St John-Saaltink; Peter Kok; Hakwan C Lau; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  From fixed points to chaos: three models of delayed discrimination.

Authors:  Omri Barak; David Sussillo; Ranulfo Romo; Misha Tsodyks; L F Abbott
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 11.685

Review 9.  Reinforcement learning and human behavior.

Authors:  Hanan Shteingart; Yonatan Loewenstein
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 6.627

10.  Contradictory behavioral biases result from the influence of past stimuli on perception.

Authors:  Ofri Raviv; Itay Lieder; Yonatan Loewenstein; Merav Ahissar
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.