Literature DB >> 33380327

Transcriptome analysis and differential gene expression profiling of two contrasting quinoa genotypes in response to salt stress.

Pibiao Shi1, Minfeng Gu2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Soil salinity is one of the major abiotic stress factors that affect crop growth and yield, which seriously restricts the sustainable development of agriculture. Quinoa is considered as one of the most promising crops in the future for its high nutrition value and strong adaptability to extreme weather and soil conditions. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the adaptive response to salinity stress of quinoa remain poorly understood. To identify candidate genes related to salt tolerance, we performed reference-guided assembly and compared the gene expression in roots treated with 300 mM NaCl for 0, 0.5, 2, and 24 h of two contrasting quinoa genotypes differing in salt tolerance. <br> RESULTS: The salt-tolerant (ST) genotype displayed higher seed germination rate and plant survival rate, and stronger seedling growth potential as well than the salt-sensitive (SS) genotype under salt stress. An average of 38,510,203 high-quality clean reads were generated. Significant Gene Ontology (GO) terms and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways were identified to deeper understand the differential response. Transcriptome analysis indicated that salt-responsive genes in quinoa were mainly related to biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, alpha-Linolenic acid metabolism, plant hormone signal transduction, and metabolic pathways. Moreover, several pathways were significantly enriched amongst the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in ST genotypes, such as phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, plant-pathogen interaction, isoquinoline alkaloid biosynthesis, and tyrosine metabolism. One hundred seventeen DEGs were common to various stages of both genotypes, identified as core salt-responsive genes, including some transcription factor members, like MYB, WRKY and NAC, and some plant hormone signal transduction related genes, like PYL, PP2C and TIFY10A, which play an important role in the adaptation to salt conditions of this species. The expression patterns of 21 DEGs were detected by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and confirmed the reliability of the RNA-Seq results. <br> CONCLUSIONS: We identified candidate genes involved in salt tolerance in quinoa, as well as some DEGs exclusively expressed in ST genotype. The DEGs common to both genotypes under salt stress may be the key genes for quinoa to adapt to salinity environment. These candidate genes regulate salt tolerance primarily by participating in reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging system, protein kinases biosynthesis, plant hormone signal transduction and other important biological processes. These findings provide theoretical basis for further understanding the regulation mechanism underlying salt tolerance network of quinoa, as well establish foundation for improving its tolerance to salinity in future breeding programs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Candidate genes; Differential expression; Quinoa; RNA-Seq; Salt stress; Transcriptome analysis

Year:  2020        PMID: 33380327     DOI: 10.1186/s12870-020-02753-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Plant Biol        ISSN: 1471-2229            Impact factor:   4.215


  59 in total

1.  Plant salt tolerance.

Authors:  J K Zhu
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 18.313

Review 2.  Genetic analysis of plant salt tolerance using Arabidopsis.

Authors:  J K Zhu
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Ecology. Crops for a salinized world.

Authors:  Jelte Rozema; Timothy Flowers
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Salt bladders: do they matter?

Authors:  Sergey Shabala; Jayakumar Bose; Rainer Hedrich
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 18.313

Review 5.  Abiotic Stress Signaling and Responses in Plants.

Authors:  Jian-Kang Zhu
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Genetic Components of Root Architecture Remodeling in Response to Salt Stress.

Authors:  Magdalena M Julkowska; Iko T Koevoets; Selena Mol; Huub Hoefsloot; Richard Feron; Mark A Tester; Joost J B Keurentjes; Arthur Korte; Michel A Haring; Gert-Jan de Boer; Christa Testerink
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 7.  Mechanism of salinity tolerance in plants: physiological, biochemical, and molecular characterization.

Authors:  Bhaskar Gupta; Bingru Huang
Journal:  Int J Genomics       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 8.  New Insights on Plant Salt Tolerance Mechanisms and Their Potential Use for Breeding.

Authors:  Moez Hanin; Chantal Ebel; Mariama Ngom; Laurent Laplaze; Khaled Masmoudi
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Identification of key genes involved in the phenotypic alterations of res (restored cell structure by salinity) tomato mutant and its recovery induced by salt stress through transcriptomic analysis.

Authors:  Irene Albaladejo; Isabel Egea; Belen Morales; Francisco B Flores; Carmen Capel; Rafael Lozano; Maria C Bolarin
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.215

Review 10.  Advances in Understanding the Physiological and Molecular Responses of Sugar Beet to Salt Stress.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Lv; Sixue Chen; Yuguang Wang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 5.753

View more
  7 in total

1.  Discovery and functional characterization of novel cotton promoters with potential application to pest control.

Authors:  Stéfanie Menezes de Moura; Elinea Oliveira Freitas; Thuanne Pires Ribeiro; Bruno Paes-de-Melo; Fabrício B M Arraes; Leonardo Lima Pepino Macedo; Joaquin F R Paixão; Isabela T Lourenço-Tessutti; Sinara Artico; David da Cunha Valença; Maria Cristina Mattar Silva; Antonio C de Oliveira; Marcio Alves-Ferreira; Maria Fatima Grossi-de-Sa
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Transcriptome Meta-Analysis Associated Targeting Hub Genes and Pathways of Drought and Salt Stress Responses in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum): A Network Biology Approach.

Authors:  Nasreen Bano; Shafquat Fakhrah; Chandra Sekhar Mohanty; Sumit Kumar Bag
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Comparative de novo transcriptome analysis identifies salinity stress responsive genes and metabolic pathways in sugarcane and its wild relative Erianthus arundinaceus [Retzius] Jeswiet.

Authors:  P Vignesh; C Mahadevaiah; R Parimalan; R Valarmathi; S Dharshini; Singh Nisha; G S Suresha; S Swathi; H K Mahadeva Swamy; V Sreenivasa; K Mohanraj; G Hemaprabha; Ram Bakshi; C Appunu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Integrative Transcriptome and Metabolome Profiles Reveal Common and Unique Pathways Involved in Seed Initial Imbibition Under Artificial and Natural Salt Stresses During Germination of Halophyte Quinoa.

Authors:  Huifang Yan; Yuting Nie; Kailun Cui; Juan Sun
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Transcriptome analysis of halophyte Nitraria tangutorum reveals multiple mechanisms to enhance salt resistance.

Authors:  Lirong Wang; Meng Du; Bo Wang; Huirong Duan; Benyin Zhang; Dong Wang; Yi Li; Jiuli Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Transcriptome dynamics uncovers long non-coding RNAs response to salinity stress in Chenopodium quinoa.

Authors:  Chuping Luo; Bing He; Pibiao Shi; Jinlong Xi; Hongbing Gui; Bingwen Pang; Junjie Cheng; Fengqin Hu; Xi Chen; Yuanda Lv
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Comparative transcriptomic and metabolic profiling provides insight into the mechanism by which the autophagy inhibitor 3-MA enhances salt stress sensitivity in wheat seedlings.

Authors:  Jieyu Yue; Yingjie Wang; Jinlan Jiao; Huazhong Wang
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 4.215

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.