Literature DB >> 33380265

Technique failure in remote patient monitoring program in patients undergoing automated peritoneal dialysis: A retrospective cohort study.

Leyder Corzo1, Martin Wilkie2, Jasmin I Vesga3, Bengt Lindholm4, Giancarlo Buitrago5, Angela S Rivera6, Rafael M Sanabria7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Remote patient monitoring (RPM) programs in automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) allow clinical teams to be aware of many aspects and events of the therapy that occur in the home. The present study evaluated the association between RPM use and APD technique failure.
METHODS: A retrospective, multicentre, observational cohort study of 558 prevalent adult APD patients included between 1 October 2016 and 30 June 2017 with follow-up until 30 June 2018 at Renal Therapy Services network in Colombia. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on the RPM use: APD-RPM (n = 148) and APD-without RPM (n = 410). Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of all patients were summarized descriptively. A propensity score was used to create a pseudo-population in which the baseline covariates were well balanced. The association of RPM with technique failure was estimated adjusting for the competing events death and kidney transplant.
RESULTS: Five hundred fifty-eight patients were analyzed. 26.5% had APD-RPM. In the matched sample comprising 148 APD-RPM and 148 APD-without RPM patients, we observed a lower technique failure rate of 0.08 [0.05-0.15] episodes per patient-year in APD-RPM versus 0.18 [0.12-0.26] in APD-without RPM cohort; incidence rate ratio = 0.45 95% confidence interval: [0.22-0.91], p-value = 0.03.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of an RPM program in APD patients may be associated with a lower technique failure rate. More extensive and interventional studies are needed to confirm its potential benefits and to measure other patient-centered outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical outcomes; peritoneal dialysis; remote patient monitoring; technique failure; telemedicine

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33380265     DOI: 10.1177/0896860820982223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  4 in total

Review 1.  The utility of remote patient management in peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Haci Hasan Yeter; Sabrina Milan Manani; Claudio Ronco
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2021-07-06

2.  Effects of a remote patient monitoring system for patients on automated peritoneal dialysis: a randomized crossover controlled trial.

Authors:  Kiyotaka Uchiyama; Kohkichi Morimoto; Naoki Washida; Ei Kusahana; Takashin Nakayama; Tomoaki Itoh; Takahiro Kasai; Shu Wakino; Hiroshi Itoh
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.266

3.  Impact of telehealth interventions added to peritoneal dialysis-care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Geertje K M Biebuyck; Aegida Neradova; Carola W H de Fijter; Lily Jakulj
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 2.585

4.  Time on Therapy of Automated Peritoneal Dialysis with and without Remote Patient Monitoring: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Mauricio Sanabria; Jasmin Vesga; Bengt Lindholm; Angela Rivera; Peter Rutherford
Journal:  Int J Nephrol       Date:  2022-08-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.