Literature DB >> 33379897

Effects of face masks on acoustic analysis and speech perception: Implications for peri-pandemic protocols.

Michelle Magee1, Courtney Lewis1, Gustavo Noffs1, Hannah Reece1, Jess C S Chan1, Charissa J Zaga1, Camille Paynter1, Olga Birchall1, Sandra Rojas Azocar1, Angela Ediriweera1, Katherine Kenyon1, Marja W Caverlé1, Benjamin G Schultz1, Adam P Vogel1.   

Abstract

Wearing face masks (alongside physical distancing) provides some protection against infection from COVID-19. Face masks can also change how people communicate and subsequently affect speech signal quality. This study investigated how three common face mask types (N95, surgical, and cloth) affected acoustic analysis of speech and perceived intelligibility in healthy subjects. Acoustic measures of timing, frequency, perturbation, and power spectral density were measured. Speech intelligibility and word and sentence accuracy were also examined using the Assessment of Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech. Mask type impacted the power distribution in frequencies above 3 kHz for the N95 mask, and above 5 kHz in surgical and cloth masks. Measures of timing and spectral tilt mainly differed with N95 mask use. Cepstral and harmonics to noise ratios remained unchanged across mask type. No differences were observed across conditions for word or sentence intelligibility measures; however, accuracy of word and sentence translations were affected by all masks. Data presented in this study show that face masks change the speech signal, but some specific acoustic features remain largely unaffected (e.g., measures of voice quality) irrespective of mask type. Outcomes have bearing on how future speech studies are run when personal protective equipment is worn.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33379897     DOI: 10.1121/10.0002873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  35 in total

1.  Modeling the influence of COVID-19 protective measures on the mechanics of phonation.

Authors:  Jonathan J Deng; Mohamed A Serry; Matías Zañartu; Byron D Erath; Sean D Peterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.482

2.  Developing Educational Health Modules to Improve Vocal Wellness in Mask-Wearing Occupational Voice Users.

Authors:  Victoria S McKenna; Renee L Gustin; Rebecca J Howell; Tulsi H Patel; Mariah B Emery; Courtney L Kendall; Nicholas J Kelliher
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Impact of Face Masks on Speech Acoustics and Vocal Effort in Healthcare Professionals.

Authors:  Victoria S McKenna; Courtney L Kendall; Tulsi H Patel; Rebecca J Howell; Renee L Gustin
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Infants recognize words spoken through opaque masks but not through clear masks.

Authors:  Leher Singh; Agnes Tan; Paul C Quinn
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2021-05-03

5.  Toward Realigning Automatic Speaker Verification in the Era of COVID-19.

Authors:  Awais Khan; Ali Javed; Khalid Mahmood Malik; Muhammad Anas Raza; James Ryan; Abdul Khader Jilani Saudagar; Hafiz Malik
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Acoustic Effect of Face Mask Design and Material Choice.

Authors:  B T Balamurali; Tan Enyi; Christopher Johann Clarke; Sim Yuh Harn; Jer-Ming Chen
Journal:  Acoust Aust       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 1.500

7.  Effects of Wearing Face Masks While Using Different Speaking Styles in Noise on Speech Intelligibility During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Hoyoung Yi; Ashly Pingsterhaus; Woonyoung Song
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-28

8.  Face masks and speaking style affect audio-visual word recognition and memory of native and non-native speech.

Authors:  Rajka Smiljanic; Sandie Keerstock; Kirsten Meemann; Sarah M Ransom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Influence of surgical and N95 face masks on speech perception and listening effort in noise.

Authors:  Torsten Rahne; Laura Fröhlich; Stefan Plontke; Luise Wagner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Face mask type affects audiovisual speech intelligibility and subjective listening effort in young and older adults.

Authors:  Violet A Brown; Kristin J Van Engen; Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-07-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.