Literature DB >> 33378385

Tactile information counteracts the attenuation of rubber hand illusion attributable to increased visuo-proprioceptive divergence.

Piotr Litwin1,2, Beata Zybura1, Paweł Motyka1.   

Abstract

Sense of body ownership is an immediate and distinct experience of one's body as belonging to oneself. While it is well-recognized that ownership feelings emerge from the integration of visual and somatosensory signals, the principles upon which they are integrated are still intensely debated. Here, we used the rubber hand illusion (RHI) to examine how the interplay of visual, tactile, and proprioceptive signals is governed depending on their spatiotemporal properties. For this purpose, the RHI was elicited in different conditions varying with respect to the extent of visuo-proprioceptive divergence (i.e., the distance between the real and fake hands) and differing in terms of the availability and spatiotemporal complexity of tactile stimulation (none, simple, or complex). We expected that the attenuating effect of distance on illusion strength will be more pronounced in the absence of touch (when proprioception gains relatively higher importance) and absent in the presence of complex tactile signals. Additionally, we hypothesized that participants with greater proprioceptive acuity-assessed using an elbow joint position discrimination task-will be less susceptible to the illusion, but only under the conditions of limited tactile stimulation. In line with our prediction, RHI was attenuated at the farthest distance only when tactile information was absent or simplified, but the attenuation was effectively prevented by the use of complex tactile stimulation-in this case, RHI was comparably vivid at both distances. However, passive proprioceptive acuity was not related to RHI strength in either of the conditions. The results indicate that complex-structured tactile signals can override the influence of proprioceptive signals in body attribution processes. These findings extend our understanding of body ownership by showing that it is primarily determined by informative cues from the most relevant sensory domains, rather than mere accumulation of multisensory evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33378385      PMCID: PMC7773248          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  50 in total

1.  What is embodiment? A psychometric approach.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo; Friederike Schüür; Marjolein P M Kammers; Manos Tsakiris; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-02-11

2.  Proprioceptive drift without illusions of ownership for rotated hands in the "rubber hand illusion" paradigm.

Authors:  Henning Holle; Neil McLatchie; Stefanie Maurer; Jamie Ward
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.065

3.  Artificial hand illusions dynamics: Onset and fading of static rubber and virtual moving hand illusions.

Authors:  Olga Perepelkina; Viktoriia Vorobeva; Olga Melnikova; Galina Arina; Valentina Nikolaeva
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2018-09-12

4.  Restoring tactile awareness through the rubber hand illusion in cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Bigna Lenggenhager; Giorgio Scivoletto; Marco Molinari; Mariella Pazzaglia
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 5.  The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis.

Authors:  Johnny van Doorn; Don van den Bergh; Udo Böhm; Fabian Dablander; Koen Derks; Tim Draws; Alexander Etz; Nathan J Evans; Quentin F Gronau; Julia M Haaf; Max Hinne; Šimon Kucharský; Alexander Ly; Maarten Marsman; Dora Matzke; Akash R Komarlu Narendra Gupta; Alexandra Sarafoglou; Angelika Stefan; Jan G Voelkel; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-06

6.  Bodily pleasure matters: velocity of touch modulates body ownership during the rubber hand illusion.

Authors:  Laura Crucianelli; Nicola K Metcalf; Aikaterini Katerina Fotopoulou; Paul M Jenkinson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-08

7.  Perceptual drifts of real and artificial limbs in the rubber hand illusion.

Authors:  Xaver Fuchs; Martin Riemer; Martin Diers; Herta Flor; Jörg Trojan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Assessing proprioception: What do you really want to know?-Response to Krewer et al.

Authors:  Jia Han; Gordon Waddington; Roger Adams; Judith Anson; Yu Liu
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 7.179

9.  The rubber hand illusion in hypnosis provides new insights into the sense of body ownership.

Authors:  Mirta Fiorio; Michele Modenese; Paola Cesari
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Dissociation of feeling and belief in the rubber hand illusion.

Authors:  Luigi Tamè; Sally A Linkenauger; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.