Thijs T Jansz1,2, Akin Özyilmaz3,4, Franka E van Reekum1, Franciscus T J Boereboom2, Pim A de Jong5, Marianne C Verhaar1, Brigit C van Jaarsveld6. 1. Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 2. Dianet Dialysis Centers, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 3. Dialysis Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 4. Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. 6. Department of Nephrology and Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences (ACS), Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and is strongly associated with vascular calcification. An important driver of vascular calcification is high phosphate levels, but these become lower when patients initiate nocturnal hemodialysis or receive a kidney transplant. However, it is unknown whether nocturnal hemodialysis or kidney transplantation mitigate vascular calcification. Therefore, we compared progression of coronary artery calcification (CAC) between patients treated with conventional hemodialysis, nocturnal hemodialysis, and kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: We measured CAC annually up to 3 years in 114 patients with ESRD that were transplantation candidates: 32 that continued conventional hemodialysis, 34 that initiated nocturnal hemodialysis (≥4x 8 hours/week), and 48 that received a kidney transplant. We compared CAC progression between groups as the difference in square root transformed volume scores per year (ΔCAC SQRV) using linear mixed models. Reference category was conventional hemodialysis. RESULTS: The mean age of the study population was 53 ±13 years, 75 (66%) were male, and median dialysis duration was 28 (IQR 12-56) months. Median CAC score at enrollment was 171 (IQR 10-647), which did not differ significantly between treatment groups (P = 0.83). Compared to conventional hemodialysis, CAC progression was non-significantly different in nocturnal hemodialysis -0.10 (95% CI -0.77 to 0.57) and kidney transplantation -0.33 (95% CI -0.96 to 0.29) in adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: Nocturnal hemodialysis and kidney transplantation are not associated with significantly less CAC progression compared to conventional hemodialysis during up to 3 years follow-up. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings, to determine which type of calcification is measured with CAC in end-stage renal disease, and whether that reflects cardiovascular risk.
INTRODUCTION:Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and is strongly associated with vascular calcification. An important driver of vascular calcification is high phosphate levels, but these become lower when patients initiate nocturnal hemodialysis or receive a kidney transplant. However, it is unknown whether nocturnal hemodialysis or kidney transplantation mitigate vascular calcification. Therefore, we compared progression of coronary artery calcification (CAC) between patients treated with conventional hemodialysis, nocturnal hemodialysis, and kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: We measured CAC annually up to 3 years in 114 patients with ESRD that were transplantation candidates: 32 that continued conventional hemodialysis, 34 that initiated nocturnal hemodialysis (≥4x 8 hours/week), and 48 that received a kidney transplant. We compared CAC progression between groups as the difference in square root transformed volume scores per year (ΔCAC SQRV) using linear mixed models. Reference category was conventional hemodialysis. RESULTS: The mean age of the study population was 53 ±13 years, 75 (66%) were male, and median dialysis duration was 28 (IQR 12-56) months. Median CAC score at enrollment was 171 (IQR 10-647), which did not differ significantly between treatment groups (P = 0.83). Compared to conventional hemodialysis, CAC progression was non-significantly different in nocturnal hemodialysis -0.10 (95% CI -0.77 to 0.57) and kidney transplantation -0.33 (95% CI -0.96 to 0.29) in adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: Nocturnal hemodialysis and kidney transplantation are not associated with significantly less CAC progression compared to conventional hemodialysis during up to 3 years follow-up. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings, to determine which type of calcification is measured with CAC in end-stage renal disease, and whether that reflects cardiovascular risk.
Authors: Sharon M Moe; Kalisha D O'Neill; Martina Reslerova; Martina Resterova; Naomi Fineberg; Scott Persohn; Cristopher A Meyer Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2004-07-13 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Hartmut H Malluche; Gustav Blomquist; Marie-Claude Monier-Faugere; Thomas L Cantor; Daniel L Davenport Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-04-02 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Rajiv Saran; Yi Li; Bruce Robinson; Kevin C Abbott; Lawrence Y C Agodoa; John Ayanian; Jennifer Bragg-Gresham; Rajesh Balkrishnan; Joline L T Chen; Elizabeth Cope; Paul W Eggers; Daniel Gillen; Debbie Gipson; Susan M Hailpern; Yoshio N Hall; Kevin He; William Herman; Michael Heung; Richard A Hirth; David Hutton; Steven J Jacobsen; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Csaba P Kovesdy; Yee Lu; Miklos Z Molnar; Hal Morgenstern; Brahmajee Nallamothu; Danh V Nguyen; Ann M O'Hare; Brett Plattner; Ronald Pisoni; Friedrich K Port; Panduranga Rao; Connie M Rhee; Ankit Sakhuja; Douglas E Schaubel; David T Selewski; Vahakn Shahinian; John J Sim; Peter Song; Elani Streja; Manjula Kurella Tamura; Francesca Tentori; Sarah White; Kenneth Woodside; Richard A Hirth Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Paolo Raggi; Amy Boulay; Scott Chasan-Taber; Naseem Amin; Maureen Dillon; Steven K Burke; Glenn M Chertow Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2002-02-20 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Darren Yuen; Andreas Pierratos; Robert M A Richardson; Christopher T Chan Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2006-02-27 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Sophie A Jamal; Ben Vandermeer; Paolo Raggi; David C Mendelssohn; Trish Chatterley; Marlene Dorgan; Charmaine E Lok; David Fitchett; Ross T Tsuyuki Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-07-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche; Jesse D Schold; Titte R Srinivas; Alan Reed; Bruce Kaplan Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 8.086