| Literature DB >> 33377656 |
Yueqi Chen1,2, Wenhui Hu1, Yiran Wang1, Yuheng Li1, Xiaoming Li1, Haibo Li3, Yong Tang2, Lincheng Zhang1, Yutong Dong1, Xiaochao Yang1, Ye Wei4, Shiwu Dong1,2,5.
Abstract
<span class="abstract_title">BACKGROUND: <span class="Disease">Inflammatory osteolysis is a severe infectious bone disorder that occurs during orthopaedic surgery and is caused by disruptions in the dynamic balance of bone matrix homeostasis, which makes this condition a burden on surgical procedures. Developing novel therapeutic drugs about inhibiting excessive osteoclastogenesis acts as an efficient approach to preventing inflammatory bone destruction.Entities:
Keywords: PTEN; inflammatory osteolysis; osteoclastogenesis; small molecule
Year: 2020 PMID: 33377656 PMCID: PMC7708775 DOI: 10.1002/ctm2.240
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Transl Med ISSN: 2001-1326
FIGURE 1Selection and evaluation about the effects of small molecules on osteoclasts differentiation. A, Schematic diagram for design of evaluation about the effects on inflammatory osteolysis in vitro and in vivo. B, The chemical molecular formulas of these compounds and the cytotoxicity evaluation about them in the presence of RANKL and M‐CSF for 24 hours and 72 hours. C, Representative images of TRAP staining of BMMs cells cultured with different compounds in the presence of RANKL and M‐CSF for 6 days. Bar represents 200 μm. Images are representative of n = 3 independent experiments. The data in the figures represent the averages ± SD. Significant differences are indicated as * (P < .05), ** (P < .01) and *** (P < .001) paired using Student's t‐test unless otherwise specified. N.S. represented as the no significant difference
FIGURE 2Compound 17 inhibits RANKL‐induced osteoclast formation and bone resorption activity both in time and dose dependent manner. A, Representative images of TRAP staining, bone resorption assay and pit formation assay of RANKL induced osteoclasts in the absence or presence with different concentration of compound 17 for 6 days. Bar represents 200 μm. Images are representative of n = 3 independent experiments. B, Quantification analysis of the proportion about bone resorption area. C, Quantification analysis of the proportion about pit formation area. D, Quantification analysis of the TRAP positive osteoclasts in each well. E, Representative images of TRAP staining and FAK staining of RANKL‐induced osteoclasts in the absence or presence with different concentration of compound 17 for various days. Bar represents 200 μm. Images are representative of n = 3 independent experiments. F, Quantification analysis of the average nuclei number in each osteoclast. G, Quantification analysis of the TRAP positive osteoclasts in each well. H, Relative expression of marker genes in the procedure of RANKL‐induced osteoclastogenesis from monocytes to mature osteoclasts at mRNA level. The data in the figures represent the averages ± SD. Significant differences are indicated as * (P < .05), ** (P < .01) and *** (P < .001) paired using Student's t‐test unless otherwise specified. N.S. represented as the no significant difference
FIGURE 3Compound 17 suppresses LPS‐induced osteoclastogenesis and bone erosion ability. A, Representative images of TRAP staining, FAK staining, bone resorption assay and pit formation assay of LPS induced osteoclasts in the absence or presence with compound 17 for other days. Bar represents 200 μm. Images are representative of n = 3 independent experiments. B, Quantification analysis of the proportion about bone resorption area. C, Quantification analysis of the proportion about pit formation area. D, Quantification analysis of the TRAP positive osteoclasts in each well. E, Quantification analysis of the average nuclei number in each osteoclast. F, Relative expression of marker genes in the procedure of LPS induced osteoclastogenesis from monocytes to mature osteoclasts at mRNA level. The data in the figures represent the averages ± SD. Significant differences are indicated as * (P < .05), ** (P < .01) and *** (P < .001) paired using Student's t‐test unless otherwise specified. N.S. represented as the no significant difference
FIGURE 4Compound 17 restrains the expression of marker genes at different stages during osteoclastogenesis and NLRP3 inflammasome signaling pathway. A, Relative expression of CTSK, CD9, c‐Fos and NFATc1 during treatment with RANKL in the presence or absence of compound 17 during the differentiation procedure from monocytes to pre‐osteoclasts at the protein level. β‐actin was used as an internal control. B, Relative expression of TRAP, CTSK, MMP9, c‐Fos and NFATc1 during treatment with RANKL in the presence or absence of compound 17 during the differentiation procedure from monocytes to mature osteoclasts at the protein level. β‐actin was used as an internal control. C, Quantification of the ratios of band intensity of CTSK, CD9, c‐Fos and NFATc1 relative to β‐actin. D, Quantification of the ratios of band intensity of TRAP, CTSK, MMP9, c‐Fos and NFATc1 relative to β‐actin. E, Relative expression of ASC, caspase‐1, pro‐caspase‐1, IL‐1β, pro‐IL1β and NLRP3 after treatment with RANKL in the presence or absence of compound 17 during the differentiation procedure from monocytes to mature osteoclasts at the protein level. β‐actin was used as an internal control. F, Quantification of the ratios of band intensity of ASC, caspase‐1, pro‐caspase‐1, IL‐1β, pro‐IL1β and NLRP3 relative to β‐actin. The data in the figures represent the averages ± SD. Significant differences are indicated as ** (P < .01) paired using Student's t‐test unless otherwise specified
FIGURE 5Compound 17 dramatically attenuates NF‐κB signaling pathway via the ubiquitination of PTEN. A, Representative images of the intracellular location of the NF‐κB p65, which were observed by immunofluorescence staining using confocal microscopy. Scale bar = 400μm. Images are representative of n = 3 independent experiments. B, Quantification analysis about the proportion of NF‐κB p65 nuclear translocation positive cells per well. C, Quantitative analysis of the mean intensity of NF‐ĸB p65 in the cells nuclear. D, Relative expression of p‐NFκB p65, NF‐κB p65, p‐IκBα and IκBα after treatment with RANKL in the presence or absence of compound 17 during the stimulation for 0‐60 minutes at the protein level. β‐actin was used as an internal control. E, Quantification of the ratios of band intensity of p‐NFκB p65 relative to NF‐κB p65. F, Quantification of the ratios of band intensity of p‐IκBα relative to IκBα. G, Representative images of TRAP staining and FAK staining of RANKL‐induced osteoclasts in different groups (RANKL, RANKL+Compound 17, RANKL+VO‐Ohpic, RANKL+Compound 17+VO‐Ohpic) for other days. Bar represents 200 μm. Images are representative of n = 3 independent experiments. H, Quantification analysis of the TRAP positive osteoclasts in each well. I, Quantification analysis of the average nuclei number in each osteoclast. J, BMMs were cultured with RANKL (50 ng/mL) in the presence or absence of compound 17 for 8 hours, and treated with CHX (50 μg/mL) for the indicated times. Total cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting analysis. K, Quantification of the ratios of band intensity of PTEN relative to β‐actin. L, BMMs were pretreated with compound 17 for 8 hours, with or without MG132 (50 μM) for 2 hours, and then treated with RANKL (50 ng/mL) for 30 minutes. The cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with PTEN antibody and immunoblotted with ubiquitin and PTEN antibodies. The data in the figures represent the averages ± SD. Significant differences are indicated as ** (P < .01) and *** (P < .001) paired using Student's t‐test unless otherwise specified. N.S. represented as the no significant difference
FIGURE 6Compound 17 predominantly promotes osteoblasts differentiation and mineralization. A, Representative images of ARS staining during osteoblast mineralization in the absence or presence with compound 17 for 14 days. Bar represents 200 μm. Images are representative of n = 3 independent experiments. B, Representative images of ALP staining during osteoblastogenesis in the absence or presence with compound 17 for 7 days. Bar represents 200 μm. Images are representative of n = 3 independent experiments. C, Relative expression of marker genes during osteoblast differentiation and mineralization such as ALP, Runx2, Osterix and OCN at mRNA level. The data in the figures represent the averages ± SD. Significant differences are indicated as * (P < .05) and ** (P < .01) paired using Student's t‐test unless otherwise specified
FIGURE 7Compound 17 modulates M1 subtype macrophage polarization and repolarization. A, Schematic diagram for design of macrophage polarization and repolarization. B, Representative images of immunofluorescence staining about inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) (green), CD206 (green) and DAPI (blue) in isolated BMMs among different groups. Images are representative of n = 3 independent experiments. Scale bar = 200μm. C, Quantification analysis of the iNOS positive cells per well. D, Quantification analysis of the CD206 positive cells per well. E, Relative expression of marker genes during macrophage polarization and repolarization such as iNOS, Arg‐1, Chil‐3, IRF5, CCL‐5, IL‐10, TNF‐α and IL‐1β at mRNA level. F, Relative expression of marker genes during macrophage polarization and repolarization such as (A) iNOS and Arg‐1 at protein level. G, Relative expression of iNOS and Arg‐1 after exhibiting with macrophage polarization and repolarization in the presence or absence of compound 17 at the protein level. β‐actin was used as an internal control. The data in the figures represent the averages ± SD. Significant differences are indicated as * (P < .05), ** (P < .01) and *** (P < .001) paired using Student's t‐test unless otherwise specified. N.S. represented as the no significant difference
FIGURE 8Compound 17 predominantly prevents inflammatory bone destruction in vivo. A, Representative 3D micro‐CT images of reconstructed mouse calvarial (from internal to external/from external to internal). Images are representative of n = 3 independent experiments. B, Quantification analysis of bone mineral density (BMD), trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), and trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV). C, Representative images of cranial sections stained with H&E, Masson and TRAP from each group. Scale bars = 400μm. Images are representative of n = 3 independent experiments. D, Quantification analysis about the percentage of bone area in the border zone of the cranial H&E staining by using Image J software and the analysis of TRAP‐positive cells in each group. E, Representative images of cranial sections stained with immunohistochemical staining for iNOS, CD206, NLRP3 and IL‐1β from each group. Scale bars = 400μm. Images are representative of n = 3 independent experiments. F, Quantification analysis about the iNOS, CD206, NLRP3 and IL‐1β positive cells per mm. G, The concentration of inflammatory cytokines in the serum such as IL‐1β, IL‐6 and TNF‐α was evaluated by using ELISA assay. The data in the figures represent the averages ± SD. Significant differences are indicated as * (P < .05), ** (P < .01) and *** (P < .001) paired using Student's t‐test unless otherwise specified.
FIGURE 9A promising scheme for the protective effects of compound 17 on inflammatory bone destruction. Schematic diagrams showing that compound 17 makes the protective effects on inflammatory osteolysis through negatively regulating excessive osteoclastogenesis via PTEN dependent signaling