Demitrius R Washington1, Zhanhai Li2, Lani C Fox3,4, Freya M Mowat1,5. 1. Department of Clinical Sciences College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA. 2. Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. 3. Geostatistical Consulting Claremont, Claremont, CA, USA. 4. Gillings School of Public Health, Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 5. Department of Surgical Sciences School of Veterinary Medicine, and Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Canine sudden acquired retinal degeneration syndrome (SARDS) causes blindness for which there are no proven effective treatments. We aimed to clarify the time to vision loss, treatment response/side effects, and prognosis for life in dogs with SARDS. METHODS: An online questionnaire was administered to owners of dogs with a historical diagnosis of SARDS. Mortality data were compared with a published purebred reference population. Select parameters were analyzed statistically using general linear model with least square means, two-sample t tests, and chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Responses from owners that stated that their dog visited an ophthalmologist and had electroretinography performed (n = 434) were analyzed. The majority of owners (65.4%) reported the time from vision disturbance to complete vision loss as <2 weeks; 19.4% reported >4 weeks. Onset of systemic clinical signs to complete vision loss was >4 weeks in 44.5% of responses. A higher proportion of owners reported some vision recovery with combination treatment (14.4%) compared with monotherapy (3.2%, P = .0004). Side effects of treatment were commonly reported. Dogs with SARDS did not have a shorter lifespan than the reference population but had higher incidence of kidney disease (P = .0001) and respiratory disease (P = .0004) at death. CONCLUSIONS: Dogs with SARDS have a rapid onset of vision loss. In the owner's opinion, treatment is unlikely to restore vision and is associated with systemic side effects. The potential for systemic pathologies that arise after SARDS diagnosis warrants further study.
BACKGROUND: Canine sudden acquired retinal degeneration syndrome (SARDS) causes blindness for which there are no proven effective treatments. We aimed to clarify the time to vision loss, treatment response/side effects, and prognosis for life in dogs with SARDS. METHODS: An online questionnaire was administered to owners of dogs with a historical diagnosis of SARDS. Mortality data were compared with a published purebred reference population. Select parameters were analyzed statistically using general linear model with least square means, two-sample t tests, and chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Responses from owners that stated that their dog visited an ophthalmologist and had electroretinography performed (n = 434) were analyzed. The majority of owners (65.4%) reported the time from vision disturbance to complete vision loss as <2 weeks; 19.4% reported >4 weeks. Onset of systemic clinical signs to complete vision loss was >4 weeks in 44.5% of responses. A higher proportion of owners reported some vision recovery with combination treatment (14.4%) compared with monotherapy (3.2%, P = .0004). Side effects of treatment were commonly reported. Dogs with SARDS did not have a shorter lifespan than the reference population but had higher incidence of kidney disease (P = .0001) and respiratory disease (P = .0004) at death. CONCLUSIONS: Dogs with SARDS have a rapid onset of vision loss. In the owner's opinion, treatment is unlikely to restore vision and is associated with systemic side effects. The potential for systemic pathologies that arise after SARDS diagnosis warrants further study.
Authors: Jennifer Yordy; Cornelia Kraus; Jessica J Hayward; Michelle E White; Laura M Shannon; Kate E Creevy; Daniel E L Promislow; Adam R Boyko Journal: Conserv Genet Date: 2019-12-05 Impact factor: 2.538
Authors: Jane A Stuckey; Jacqueline W Pearce; Elizabeth A Giuliano; Leah A Cohn; Ellison Bentley; Amy J Rankin; Margi A Gilmour; Christine C Lim; Rachel A Allbaugh; Cecil P Moore; Richard W Madsen Journal: J Am Vet Med Assoc Date: 2013-11-15 Impact factor: 1.936
Authors: Stephanie C Osinchuk; Marina L Leis; Elyse M Salpeter; Lynne S Sandmeyer; Bruce H Grahn Journal: Vet Ophthalmol Date: 2018-08-22 Impact factor: 1.644
Authors: Candace R Auten; Sara M Thomasy; Philip H Kass; Kathryn L Good; Steven R Hollingsworth; David J Maggs Journal: Vet Ophthalmol Date: 2017-08-27 Impact factor: 1.644
Authors: Freya M Mowat; Janelle Avelino; Ashley Bowyer; Vanessa Parslow; Hans D Westermeyer; Melanie L Foster; Jonathan E Fogle; Petra Bizikova Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2020-02-29 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Amanda R Heller; Alexandra van der Woerdt; James E Gaarder; John S Sapienza; Elena Hernandez-Merino; Kenneth Abrams; Melanie L Church; Noelle La Croix Journal: Vet Ophthalmol Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 1.644
Authors: Stephanie J Stromberg; Sara M Thomasy; Ariana D Marangakis; Soohyun Kim; Ann E Cooper; Emily A Brown; David J Maggs; Danika L Bannasch Journal: Vet Ophthalmol Date: 2019-02-21 Impact factor: 1.644