Sandra M Shi1,2, Brianne Olivieri-Mui1, Ellen P McCarthy1,2, Dae H Kim1,2. 1. Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging, Hebrew Senior Life, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although frailty status is dynamic, whether improvements in frailty predict mortality is unknown. OBJECTIVE: Describe 1-year changes in a frailty index (FI) and association with 48-month mortality. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the National Health in Aging Trends Study. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: Five thousand six hundred and seventy two Medicare beneficiaries 65 and older (3,267 (55.8%) females). MEASUREMENTS: A 40-item deficit accumulation FI was measured in 2011 and 2012, based on multidomain assessment including comorbidities, activities of daily living, physical tasks, cognition, and performance testing. We categorized 2011 FI into robust (FI < 0.15), pre-frail (FI = 0.15-0.24), mild frailty (FI = 0.25-0.34), and moderate to severe frailty (FI ≥ 0.35). Change in frailty was calculated as the FI change from 2011 to 2012, categorized as either absolute (>0.045 decrease, 0.015-0.045 decrease, ±0.015 change, 0.015-0.045 increase, >0.045 increase) or proportional change (>20% decrease, 5-20% decrease, ±5% change, 5-20% increase, 20% increase). We measured the association of FI change with 4-year mortality using Cox regression. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2012, mean FI increased by 0.02 (standard deviation 0.07), with 58.6% having an increase. Over 4 years, 1,039 participants (13.6%) died. After adjusting for age and sex, compared to stable frailty (±0.015), both absolute (>0.045) and proportional (>20%) increases in frailty were associated with higher mortality among pre-frail participants (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (1.45-3.79) and HR (95% CI) = 3.32 (1.76-6.26), respectively), participants with mild frailty (HR (95% CI) = 1.96 (1.35-2.85) and 2.03 (1.37-3.02)) and moderate or severe frailty (HR (95% CI) = 1.99 (1.48-2.67) and 1.94 (1.43-2.63)) but not robust participants (HR (95% CI)= 1.48 (0.86-2.54), HR (95% CI) = 1.62 (0.80-3.28)). However, decreases in FI were not significantly associated with decreased risk of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing deficit accumulation FI over 1 year is associated with increased mortality risk. While decreasing FI occurs, we did not find evidence to support reduced mortality risk.
BACKGROUND: Although frailty status is dynamic, whether improvements in frailty predict mortality is unknown. OBJECTIVE: Describe 1-year changes in a frailty index (FI) and association with 48-month mortality. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the National Health in Aging Trends Study. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: Five thousand six hundred and seventy two Medicare beneficiaries 65 and older (3,267 (55.8%) females). MEASUREMENTS: A 40-item deficit accumulation FI was measured in 2011 and 2012, based on multidomain assessment including comorbidities, activities of daily living, physical tasks, cognition, and performance testing. We categorized 2011 FI into robust (FI < 0.15), pre-frail (FI = 0.15-0.24), mild frailty (FI = 0.25-0.34), and moderate to severe frailty (FI ≥ 0.35). Change in frailty was calculated as the FI change from 2011 to 2012, categorized as either absolute (>0.045 decrease, 0.015-0.045 decrease, ±0.015 change, 0.015-0.045 increase, >0.045 increase) or proportional change (>20% decrease, 5-20% decrease, ±5% change, 5-20% increase, 20% increase). We measured the association of FI change with 4-year mortality using Cox regression. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2012, mean FI increased by 0.02 (standard deviation 0.07), with 58.6% having an increase. Over 4 years, 1,039 participants (13.6%) died. After adjusting for age and sex, compared to stable frailty (±0.015), both absolute (>0.045) and proportional (>20%) increases in frailty were associated with higher mortality among pre-frail participants (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (1.45-3.79) and HR (95% CI) = 3.32 (1.76-6.26), respectively), participants with mild frailty (HR (95% CI) = 1.96 (1.35-2.85) and 2.03 (1.37-3.02)) and moderate or severe frailty (HR (95% CI) = 1.99 (1.48-2.67) and 1.94 (1.43-2.63)) but not robust participants (HR (95% CI)= 1.48 (0.86-2.54), HR (95% CI) = 1.62 (0.80-3.28)). However, decreases in FI were not significantly associated with decreased risk of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing deficit accumulation FI over 1 year is associated with increased mortality risk. While decreasing FI occurs, we did not find evidence to support reduced mortality risk.
Authors: Arnold Mitnitski; Xiaowei Song; Ingmar Skoog; G A Broe; Jafna L Cox; Eva Grunfeld; Kenneth Rockwood Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Mark Q Thompson; Olga Theou; Graeme R Tucker; Robert J Adams; Renuka Visvanathan Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-07-18 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Nader Fallah; Arnold Mitnitski; Samuel D Searle; Evelyne A Gahbauer; Thomas M Gill; Kenneth Rockwood Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Nuno Mendonça; Andrew Kingston; Mohammad Yadegarfar; Helen Hanson; Rachel Duncan; Carol Jagger; Louise Robinson Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2020-10-23 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Daniel Stow; Fiona E Matthews; Stephen Barclay; Steve Iliffe; Andrew Clegg; Sarah De Biase; Louise Robinson; Barbara Hanratty Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Rasheeda K Hall; Sarah Morton; Jonathan Wilson; Dae Hyun Kim; Cathleen Colón-Emeric; Julia J Scialla; Alyssa Platt; Patti L Ephraim; L Ebony Boulware; Jane Pendergast Journal: Kidney360 Date: 2022-07-19
Authors: Rachel E Ward; Ariela R Orkaby; Clark Dumontier; Brian Charest; Chelsea E Hawley; Enzo Yaksic; Lien Quach; Dae H Kim; David R Gagnon; J Michael Gaziano; Kelly Cho; Luc Djousse; Jane A Driver Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2021-10-13 Impact factor: 6.591
Authors: Sasmita Kusumastuti; Emiel O Hoogendijk; Thomas A Gerds; Rikke Lund; Erik L Mortensen; Martijn Huisman; Rudi G J Westendorp Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2022-03-12 Impact factor: 3.921