Literature DB >> 33377011

Protocol for Flow Cytometric Detection of Immune Cell Infiltration in the Epidermis and Dermis of a Psoriasis Mouse Model.

Fangzhou Lou1, Yang Sun1, Honglin Wang1.   

Abstract

Psoriasis is an incurable chronic inflammatory skin disorder. The imiquimod (IMQ)-induced mouse model of psoriasis is the most widely used model for drug discovery and pre-clinical studies of psoriasis. The inflamed and thickened skin frequently compromises the quality of single-cell suspensions generated from IMQ-induced skin lesions, which has an impact on subsequent analyses by flow cytometry. This protocol details the complete procedure for the establishment of a mouse model of psoriasis and flow cytometric detection of immune cells in the inflamed epidermis and dermis. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Lou et al. (2020).
© 2020 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33377011      PMCID: PMC7757015          DOI: 10.1016/j.xpro.2020.100115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  STAR Protoc        ISSN: 2666-1667


Before You Begin

Before working with this protocol, ensure that the appropriate mouse strain is chosen. According to a study comparing gene expression profiles of psoriasiform phenotype induced by IMQ in different mouse strains, C57BL/6J (B6) mice outweighed other strains including BALB/cJ, CD1, DBA/1J, FVB/NJ, 129X1/SvJ, and MOLF/EiJ mice, to better mirror the characteristics of human psoriasis (Swindell et al., 2017). We recommend using mice with B6 background for studies involving IMQ-induced mouse model of psoriasis. This protocol is optimized for mice with B6 background and has also been tested on mice with BALB/c background. Compared to C57BL/6J strain, C57BL/6N strain was protected from IMQ-induced psoriasis-like skin inflammation, with the macroscopic and histological alterations markedly reduced (Bezdek et al., 2017). To guarantee a pronounced psoriasis-like phenotype, we recommend using C57BL/6J mouse strain. Choose the appropriate anatomic site of skin for further experiments. We routinely use back skin or ears for IMQ induction, and the processing procedures are slightly different. This protocol includes the procedures for the processing of both back skin and ears. 6–12-week-old mice can be used for IMQ application on the ear; 7–9-week-old mice can be used for IMQ application on the back skin when the hair cycle is in the telogen phase (Figure 1). Both males and females can be used.
Figure 1

Flowchart of Mouse Strain and Age Selection

Set up a flow panel for cells of interest. Following is the panel we use in this protocol (Table 1).
Table 1

Flow Panel for Basic Analysis of Major Immune Cell Types in Mouse Skin

FluorophoreMarkerFinal DilutionVolume Per Sample
Alexa Fluor 700CD451:2000.5 μL
FITCCD3ε1:1001 μL
APCCD11b1:2000.5 μL
PEF4/801:2000.5 μL
BV510CD11c1:1001 μL
PerCP-Cy5.5Ly6G1:2000.5 μL
DAPIn/a1:1,0000.2 μL
Flowchart of Mouse Strain and Age Selection Flow Panel for Basic Analysis of Major Immune Cell Types in Mouse Skin

Key Resources Table

Materials and Equipment

Pentobarbital Sodium Solution

Dissolve 0.45 g pentobarbital sodium in 50 mL PBS to make a 0.9% working solution. Use 10 μL per g body weight for a mouse.

Dispase II Solution

Dissolve 100 mg Dispase II in 10 mL HBSS to make a 10 mg/mL Dispase II stock. Filter and store at −20°C in 1 mL aliquots for up to 6 months. Dilute the stock with HBSS to 5 mg/mL as working solution. The working solution should be prepared on the day for sample processing and pre-chilled at 4°C. Use 1 mL for one sample.

100× Collagenase P Stock

Dissolve 100 mg Collagenase P in 1 mL DMEM/high glucose (not supplemented with antibiotics or FBS) to make a 100 mg/mL stock. Store at −20°C in 100 μL aliquots for up to 6 months.

1,000× DNase I Stock

Dissolve 100 mg DNase I in 1 mL ddH2O to make a 100 mg/mL stock. Store at −20°C in 100 μL aliquots for up to 6 months.

Dermis Dissociation Buffer

Dilute DNase I Stock to a final concentration of 100 μg/mL and Collagenase P Stock to a final concentration of 1 mg/mL with DMEM/high glucose (not supplemented with antibiotics or FBS). The buffer should be prepared on the day for sample processing and pre-chilled at 4°C. Use 3 mL for one ear sample or 3.5 mL for one back-skin sample. CRITICAL: Do not use RPMI1640 medium, as the buffer capacity of this medium is not good enough for dermis dissociation and cell viability.

0.05% TE Buffer

Dilute 2 mL Trypsin-EDTA (0.25%) with 8 mL HBSS to a final concentration of 0.05%. Store at 4°C for up to 1 month. Use 1 mL for one sample.

Trypsin Neutralizing Solution

Dilute 2.5 mL FBS with 47.5 mL HBSS to a final concentration of 5%. Store at 4°C for up to 3 months. Use 1 mL for one sample.

Staining Buffer

Dissolve 0.372 g EDTA and to a final concentration of 2 mM and 2.5 g BSA to a final concentration of 0.5% with 500 mL PBS. Filter and store at 4°C for up to 3 months.

DAPI Buffer

Dilute 50 μL DAPI Solution with 50 mL Staining Buffer. Store at 4°C in the dark for up to 3 months. Use 200 μL for one sample.

Step-By-Step Method Details

Establishment of IMQ-Induced Mouse Model of Psoriasis

Timing: 1 week IMQ cream is applied to mouse skin for 6 consecutive days to induce psoriasis-like skin lesions. Inject 90 mg/kg pentobarbital sodium intraperitoneally (i.p.) to anesthetize the mice. 400 mg/kg chloral hydrate (i.p.) can also be used. We use 7-week-old male C57BL/6J mice in this protocol. Shave a 1.5 cm × 2 cm area on mouse back skin using an electric pet shaver, not required if IMQ is applied to the ear. CRITICAL: Do not scratch the mouse skin, especially when genetically engineered mice might have vulnerable skin barriers. Weigh 5% IMQ cream using an electronic balance, 60 mg for back skin or 30 mg for ventral and dorsal sides of an ear. Smear the IMQ cream to mouse skin gently and evenly with a pair of curved forceps (Methods Video S1). Repeat steps 1 and 3–4 same time every day for 5 days. The skin thickens gradually along with daily application of IMQ. After 5 days of IMQ application, obvious erythematous lesions covered with squama will form (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Typical Psoriasis-like Skin Lesions after IMQ Application

(A) Typical psoriasis-like skin lesions on mouse ear after 5 days of IMQ treatment.

(B) Typical psoriasis-like skin lesions on mouse back skin after 5 days of IMQ treatment.

Scale bars: 0.5 cm.

Typical Psoriasis-like Skin Lesions after IMQ Application (A) Typical psoriasis-like skin lesions on mouse ear after 5 days of IMQ treatment. (B) Typical psoriasis-like skin lesions on mouse back skin after 5 days of IMQ treatment. Scale bars: 0.5 cm.

Skin Collection and Processing

Timing: ∼2 h After 6 days of IMQ application, collect the skin and separate the epidermis from the dermis. The skin can also be collected at an alternative timepoint (e.g., after 3 days, 5 days or 7 days of IMQ application) and processed in exactly the same way. Euthanize the mice by CO2 inhalation. Collect skin samples. Cut off a 1 cm × 1 cm area from mouse back skin if IMQ was applied. Such an area is enough for flow cytometric analysis of the epidermis and the dermis. If a larger area is needed, multiply the reagents accordingly. Cut off the whole ear if IMQ was applied (Figure 3A).
Figure 3

The Processing of Mouse Ear Skin

(A) A pair of IMQ-treated ears cut off from a C57BL/6J mouse.

(B) The HBSS is turbid due to the presence of IMQ cream on the ear.

(C) After washing the ear rigorously for three times, the HBSS is transparent.

(D) Splitting the dorsal and ventral sections of the ear.

Transfer the skin to an EP tube containing 1 mL HBSS and wash rigorously by quickly shaking up and down by hand for 15 s. Repeat step 8 by transferring the skin to a new EP tube and refreshed HBSS for two times to wash off remaining IMQ cream (Figures 3B, 3C, 4A, and 4B).
Figure 4

The Processing of Mouse Back Skin

(A) The HBSS is turbid due to the presence of IMQ cream on the skin.

(B) After washing the skin rigorously for three times, the HBSS is transparent.

(C) 1 cm2-area of back skin is cut into four triangular pieces for subsequent digestion with Dispase II.

(D) Back-skin tissue fragments after mechanical disruption and before enzymatic digestion.

(E) Back-skin tissue suspension after 30 min of enzymatic digestion and pipetting.

The Processing of Mouse Ear Skin (A) A pair of IMQ-treated ears cut off from a C57BL/6J mouse. (B) The HBSS is turbid due to the presence of IMQ cream on the ear. (C) After washing the ear rigorously for three times, the HBSS is transparent. (D) Splitting the dorsal and ventral sections of the ear. CRITICAL: The presence of IMQ cream affects the viability of cells released from enzyme digested tissues in the later steps. Ensure that HBSS is transparent after 3 times of washing, each for 15 s. Note that scales from the epidermis can flow in HBSS after 3 times of washing, which is normal. If processing back skin, cut the back-skin sample with scissors into two pieces along the diagonal, then to four pieces along the diagonal (Figure 4C). Cut the back skin into triangular pieces to ensure efficient digestion with Dispase II. If processing ears, split the dorsal and ventral sections of the ear with forceps (Figure 3D). Digest the skin (4 pieces of back skin or two sections of an ear) with 1 mL of Dispase II working solution in one well of a 12-well plate at 37°C for 1 h. Pre-chill HBSS at 4°C for later steps. Transfer the skin to a petri dish with 10 mL of cold HBSS and separate the epidermis from the dermis using curved forceps (Methods Videos S2 and S3). The Processing of Mouse Back Skin (A) The HBSS is turbid due to the presence of IMQ cream on the skin. (B) After washing the skin rigorously for three times, the HBSS is transparent. (C) 1 cm2-area of back skin is cut into four triangular pieces for subsequent digestion with Dispase II. (D) Back-skin tissue fragments after mechanical disruption and before enzymatic digestion. (E) Back-skin tissue suspension after 30 min of enzymatic digestion and pipetting. Wash the epidermis and the dermis with cold HBSS for three times. Transfer the epidermis to one well of a 12-well plate containing 1 mL cold HBSS and place the plate at 4°C. Dermis requires longer time for digestion, so we leave the epidermis in HBSS at 4°C until the processing of dermis is almost finished. This is to ensure all samples ready for antibody staining immediately after single-cell suspensions are prepared. The epidermis can be left at 4°C for 6 h without affecting cell viability.

Dermis Digestion

Timing: ∼1.5 h Mouse dermis samples are digested to generate single-cell suspensions. Transfer the dermis to one well of a 6-well plate placed on ice containing 1 mL of cold Dermis Dissociation Buffer. Quickly cut the dermis into pieces as small as possible (< 0.5 mm in size) with curved scissors in 1 mL of cold Dermis Dissociation Buffer in the 6-well plate placed on ice. CRITICAL: The tissue from one ear is regarded as one sample; the 1 cm × 1 cm area from back skin is regarded as one sample. Because the cutting process can be time-consuming if many samples are to be processed, proceed this step with the 6-well plate placed on ice to minimize digestion time differences between samples processed earlier or later. If there are > 4 samples, we recommend having ≥ 2 people working together in this step, to minimize digestion time differences between samples. Add another 2 mL of Dermis Dissociation Buffer to an ear sample or 2.5 mL of Dermis Dissociation Buffer to a back-skin sample (Figure 4D). Incubate the sample in a 37°C cell culture incubator for 30 min. Cut the 5 mm-long top end of a 1-mL pipet tip with scissors, and gently mix the tissue suspension by pipetting. Incubate the sample in a 37°C cell culture incubator for another 30 min. The tissue fragments become smaller visibly upon pipetting (Figure 4E). Cut the 5-mm-long top end of a 1-mL pipet tip with scissors, and gently mix the tissue suspension by pipetting. CRITICAL: There should leave no obvious debris by this time. If not, continue the 37°C incubation for another 10–30 min until the debris disappears after pipetting. Check the sample status every 10 min. Longer than 1.5 h of collagenase digestion at 37°C affects cell viability. Pass the suspension through a 40–μm cell strainer into a 50-mL tube. Rinse the well with 2 mL DMEM/high glucose containing 10% FBS and pass the suspension through the strainer into the same 50-mL tube. Add 10 mL DMEM/high glucose containing 10% FBS to the strainer to wash the sample. Filter the sample through the strainer by gravity but no other forces. Transfer the suspension to a 15-mL conical centrifuge tube. Centrifuge at 400 × g for 5 min at 4°C, discard the supernatant, and resuspend the pellet with 2 mL cold Staining Buffer. Centrifuge at 400 × g for 5 min at 4°C, discard the supernatant, and resuspend the pellet with 90 μL cold Staining Buffer. Transfer the sample to a 5-mL round-bottom flow test tube. Keep on ice until staining. One ear sample generates 5∼8 × 105 live cells; one back-skin sample generates 1∼3 × 105 live cells.

Epidermis Digestion

Timing: 30 min Mouse epidermis samples are digested to generate single-cell suspensions. Pre-warm 1 mL 0.05% TE Buffer in a 2-mL microfuge tube at 37°C water bath for 10 min. Transfer the epidermis from HBSS to a new well of the 12-well plate that does not contain any buffer. Cut the epidermis into small pieces (∼2 mm in size) with scissors and squeeze the remaining HBSS to avoid unintended dilution of the TE buffer. Transfer the sample to the TE Buffer and incubate at 37°C water bath for 5 min. Shake the sample up and down for five times. Continue incubation at 37°C water bath for 5 min. The tissue will not completely disappear due to the presence of stratum corneum and hair follicles. Add 1 mL cold trypsin neutralizing solution (4°C) to the sample and pipette rigorously for five times. Pass the suspension through a 40–μm cell strainer into a new 50-mL tube. Rinse the 2-mL tube with 2 mL of cold HBSS and pass the suspension through the strainer into the same 50-mL tube. Use 5 mL of cold HBSS to pass through the strainer to wash the sample. Transfer the suspension to a 15-mL conical centrifuge tube. Centrifuge at 400 × g for 5 min at 4°C, discard the supernatant, and resuspend the pellet with 2 mL cold Staining Buffer. Centrifuge at 400 × g for 5 min at 4°C, discard the supernatant, and resuspend the pellet with 90 μL cold Staining Buffer. Transfer the sample to a 5-mL round-bottom flow test tube. Keep on ice until staining. One sample generates 1∼2 × 105 live cells, except for untreated back-skin epidermis, which generates 4∼8 × 104 live cells.

Flow Cytometry Antibody Staining

Timing: 1 h The cell suspensions are stained with indicated antibodies for flow cytometric analysis. Set up an unstained control and seven single-stained controls. Label a tube for each fluorochrome that will be used. Aspirate 20 μL from a dermis sample to a tube labeled “Blank” and add 180 μL Staining Buffer to generate an unstained control. Keep on ice until detection. Aspirate 20 μL from a dermis sample to a tube labeled “DAPI” and add 180 μL DAPI Buffer to generate a DAPI-single-stained control. Keep on ice until detection. Mix UltraComp eBeads™ Compensation Beads by vortex. Add 1 drop of the beads to an empty labeled tube for a fluorochrome and add 0.5 μL of the relevant antibody to the tube. Mix well by flicking and incubate at 4°C for 15 min in the dark. Add 2 mL Staining Buffer, vortex briefly and centrifuge at 400 × g for 5 min at 4°C. Discard the supernatant and resuspend the pellet with 200 μL Staining Buffer. Keep on ice until detection. Adjust the epidermis and dermis sample volumes to 90 μL with Staining Buffer. Dilute Fc block at a dilution of 1:20 with Staining Buffer. Add 10 μL of the diluted Fc block to the sample and incubate at 4°C for 10 min in the dark. Mix the indicated antibodies in an EP tube (Table 1). Add 4 μL of the antibody mix (without DAPI) to the 100-μL sample, vortex briefly, and incubate at 4°C for 30 min in the dark. Add 2 mL Staining Buffer, vortex briefly and centrifuge at 400 × g for 5 min at 4°C. After this step, if intracellular cytokines are to be detected, use BD Cytofix/Cytoperm™ Fixation/Permeabilization Solution Kit to process the sample; If transcription factors are to be detected, use eBioscience™ Foxp3 / Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set to process the sample. Discard the supernatant and resuspend the pellet with 200 μL DAPI Buffer. Keep on ice until detection.

Data Collection

Timing: 1 h The data are collected using a BD LSRFortessa™ cell analyzer and analyzed using the FlowJo software. Select parameters including FSC-A, FSC-H, FSC-W, SSC-A, SSC-H, SSC-W, Alexa Fluor 700-A (CD45), FITC-A (CD3), APC-A (CD11b), PE-A (F4/80), BV510-A (CD11c), PerCP-Cy5.5-A (Ly6G) and BV421-A (DAPI). Use the unstained control and single-stained controls to set appropriate PMT voltages and adjust compensations on a BD LSRFortessa™ cell analyzer using the BD FACSDiva software. Collect a total of 5,000 events from the unstained control and from each single-stained control. Create gates for the samples (Figure 5), set “Storage Gate” value to “All Events,” “Events to Record” value to 10,000 and “Stopping Gate” value to “P4” (CD45+ cells), and collect data.
Figure 5

Gating Strategy for Data Collection

“Events to Record” value is set to 10,000 and “Stopping Gate” value is set to “P4” (CD45+ cells). CD45+ cells are gated from DAPI- live cells; CD3+ cells, CD11c+ cells, CD11b+Ly6G+ cells and CD11b+F4/80+ cells are gated from CD45+ cells.

All cells in the epidermis samples and the untreated back-skin dermis will be collected, as the numbers of CD45+ cells in these samples will not reach 10,000. Analyze the data with the FlowJo software. Dead cells have autofluorescence. Keratinocytes in the epidermis can have autofluorescence detected as FITC. This would not be a problem if dead cells are gated away, a dermis sample is used as the unstained control, and Alexa Fluor 700 is used to stain CD45. Gating Strategy for Data Collection “Events to Record” value is set to 10,000 and “Stopping Gate” value is set to “P4” (CD45+ cells). CD45+ cells are gated from DAPI- live cells; CD3+ cells, CD11c+ cells, CD11b+Ly6G+ cells and CD11b+F4/80+ cells are gated from CD45+ cells.

Expected Outcomes

The numbers of collected events from different samples and the expected percentages of live cells and leukocytes are shown (Table 2). Representative data of mouse ear and back-skin samples treated with IMQ or not are shown (Figures 6 and 7). Comparing IMQ-treated to untreated mouse skin, we expect increased percentages of CD45+ leukocytes in the ear epidermis and in the dermis of both ear and back skin. As for CD45+ leukocytes, we expect increased percentages of macrophages and neutrophils in both the epidermis and the dermis; we expect increased percentages of dendritic cells in the epidermis; we expect decreased percentages of T cells in both the epidermis and the dermis.
Table 2

Expected Percentages of Live Cells and Leukocytes

Ear
Back skin
UT
IMQ
UT
IMQ
EpidermisDermisEpidermisDermisEpidermisDermisEpidermisDermis
Total collected events∼100,000∼200,000∼150,000∼50,000∼10,000∼200,000∼150,000∼300,000
Live cells60%–80%80%–90%50%–70%70%–80%70%–80%80%–90%50%–70%70%–80%
Leukocytes5%–12%9%–15%15%–20%45%–60%7%–12%7%–12%3%–5%20%–25%
Figure 6

Immune Cells in the Epidermis and the Dermis of Mouse Ear

CD45+CD3+ for T cells, CD45+CD11c+ for dendritic cells, CD11b+Ly6G+ for neutrophils, CD11b+F4/80+ for macrophages, gated on CD45+ cells. UT, untreated mouse ear; IMQ, IMQ-treated mouse ear; Epi, epidermis; Der, dermis.

Figure 7

Immune Cells in the Epidermis and the Dermis of Mouse Back Skin

CD45+CD3+ for T cells, CD45+CD11c+ for dendritic cells, CD11b+Ly6G+ for neutrophils, CD11b+F4/80+ for macrophages, gated on CD45+ cells. UT, untreated mouse back skin; IMQ, IMQ-treated mouse back skin; Epi, epidermis; Der, dermis.

Expected Percentages of Live Cells and Leukocytes Immune Cells in the Epidermis and the Dermis of Mouse Ear CD45+CD3+ for T cells, CD45+CD11c+ for dendritic cells, CD11b+Ly6G+ for neutrophils, CD11b+F4/80+ for macrophages, gated on CD45+ cells. UT, untreated mouse ear; IMQ, IMQ-treated mouse ear; Epi, epidermis; Der, dermis. Immune Cells in the Epidermis and the Dermis of Mouse Back Skin CD45+CD3+ for T cells, CD45+CD11c+ for dendritic cells, CD11b+Ly6G+ for neutrophils, CD11b+F4/80+ for macrophages, gated on CD45+ cells. UT, untreated mouse back skin; IMQ, IMQ-treated mouse back skin; Epi, epidermis; Der, dermis.

Limitations

The flow panel used in this protocol is for basic analysis of major immune cell types in untreated or IMQ-treated mouse epidermis and dermis. For extended analysis of immune cells using flow cytometry, please refer to “Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies (second edition)”(Cossarizza et al., 2019) for further knowledge regarding antibody staining, compensation adjustment, gating strategy, etc. There is a chance that certain surface marker expression be impaired upon enzymatic digestion. DAPI is used in this protocol to counter stain dead cells, thus sample fixation for intracellular protein analysis is not expected. To perform intracellular staining, LIVE/DEAD™ Fixable Blue Dead Cell Stain Kit can be used instead of DAPI.

Troubleshooting

Problem 1

Typical psoriasis-like skin lesions do not fully develop.

Potential Solution

A pet shaver cannot make mouse back skin to get rid of fur during the anagen phase in hair cycle, which prevents the penetration of IMQ cream and induction of psoriasis-like skin lesions. Hence, make sure that the fur within the area of interest on the back skin can be thoroughly shaved and do not smear the cream to skin areas covered with fur. Some anesthesia methods inhibit the development of skin lesions since the inflammation is controlled by the neuro-immuno network. We are sure that Lidocaine and Scopolamine prevent lesion formation induced by IMQ. Other solutions include: Make sure that appropriate mouse strains and mice at the suggested age are chosen for experiment. Make sure that the concentration of the IMQ cream is 5% and the cream has not expired. Make sure that the IMQ cream is not exposed to air for long and does not dehydrate before applied to the skin.

Problem 2

Low yield of cells from IMQ-treated mouse dermis. This is one of the most frequently encountered problems when working with inflamed mouse dermis, which is thickened and hardened due to increased reticular fiber generation. This problem generally originates from rough mechanical disruption or incomplete enzymatic digestion. To overcome this, we strongly recommend Collagenase P for dermis digestion. As we have tested, Collagenase P is superior to other kinds of collagenases including Collagenase IV and dissociates inflamed dermis efficiently. Other solutions include: Cut the dermis to pieces as small as possible. Prepare fresh Dermal Dissociation Buffer. Do not stop the digestion incubation until visible debris disappears.

Problem 3

Dissociated cells with low viability. Prolonged incubation with enzyme due to inefficient digestion can result in low cell viability. To avoid this: Try solutions above to increase digestion efficacy. Use DMEM medium to buffer the lowering pH value during digestion. Wash off the remaining IMQ cream before processing the skin.

Problem 4

No positive staining of certain markers by flow cytometry. Use unstained and single-stained controls to find appropriate PMT voltages and adjust compensations. Try another antibody with a good stain index. Try another antibody clone. Refer to sections II and III [1], “Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies (second edition)” for specific solutions (Cossarizza et al., 2019).

Resource Availability

Lead Contact

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the Lead Contact, Honglin Wang (honglin.wang@sjtu.edu.cn).

Materials Availability

This study did not generate new unique reagents.

Data and Code Availability

This study did not generate new datasets or codes.
REAGENT or RESOURCESOURCEIDENTIFIER
Antibodies

Anti-mouse CD45 (clone 30-F11)eBioscienceCat#56-0451-82
Anti-mouse CD3 (clone 145-2C11)BiolegendCat#100305
Anti-mouse CD11c (clone N418)BiolegendCat#117353
Anti-mouse F4/80 (clone T45-2342)BD PharmingenCat#585410
Anti-mouse Ly6G (clone RB6-8C5)eBioscienceCat#45-5931-80
Anti-mouse CD11b (clone M1/70)eBioscienceCat#17-0112-82
Purified Rat Anti-Mouse CD16/CD32 (Mouse BD Fc Block™)BD PharmingenCat#553141

Chemicals, Peptides, and Recombinant Proteins

IMQ creamMedShineCat#120503
Pentobarbital sodiumSigma-AldrichCat#P3761
Chloral hydrateSangon BiotechCat#A600288
DAPI SolutionBD PharmingenCat#564907
20× PBSSangon BiotechCat#B548117
HBSS, no calcium, no magnesium, no phenol redGibcoCat#14175079
Dispase IISigma-AldrichCat#D4693-1G
Trypsin-EDTA (0.25%)GibcoCat#25200072
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS)GibcoCat#10270-106
DNase IRocheCat#10104159001
Collagenase P from Clostridium histolyticumRocheCat#11213857001
HyClone Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM)/high glucose with L-Glutamine; without sodium pyruvateCytivaCat#SH30022.01
EDTASigma-AldrichCat#ED2SS-100G
Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA)MP BiomedicalsCat#232-936-2

Critical Commercial Assays

UltraComp eBeads™ Compensation BeadsInvitrogenCat#01-2222-42
LIVE/DEAD™ Fixable Blue Dead Cell Stain KitInvitrogenCat#L23105
Fixation/Permeabilization Solution KitBD Cytofix/CytopermCat#554714
Foxp3 / Transcription Factor Staining Buffer SeteBioscienceCat#00-5523-00

Experimental Models: Organisms/Strains

Mouse: C57BL/6JShanghai SLAC Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd.n/a

Software and Algorithms

BD FACSDiva™ Software v8.0BD Bioscienceshttps://www.bdbiosciences.com/cn/instruments/research/software/flow-cytometry-acquisition/bd-facsdiva-software/m/111112/resourcestools
FlowJo v10.4Tree Starhttps://www.flowjo.com/

Other

Curved forcepsShanghai JinzhongCat#JD1060
Curved scissorsShanghai JinzhongCat#Y00040
EP tubeAxygenCat#MCT-150-A
2-mL microfuge tubeAmbionCat#AM12425
15-mL conical centrifuge tubeNESTCat#601002
50-mL centrifuge tubeNESTCat#602002
5-mL round-bottom flow test tubeFalconCat#38055
CentrifugeThermo ScientificMultifuge 3SR+
Cell culture CO2 incubatorThermo ScientificSeries 8000 DH
Countess IIThermo ScientificAMQAX1000
BD LSRFortessa™ cell analyzerBD Biosciencesn/a
  4 in total

1.  Excessive Polyamine Generation in Keratinocytes Promotes Self-RNA Sensing by Dendritic Cells in Psoriasis.

Authors:  Fangzhou Lou; Yang Sun; Zhenyao Xu; Liman Niu; Zhikai Wang; Siyu Deng; Zhaoyuan Liu; Hong Zhou; Jing Bai; Qianqian Yin; Xiaojie Cai; Libo Sun; Hong Wang; Qun Li; Zhouwei Wu; Xiang Chen; Jun Gu; Yu-Ling Shi; Wufan Tao; Florent Ginhoux; Honglin Wang
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 31.745

2.  The genetic difference between C57Bl/6J and C57Bl/6N mice significantly impacts Aldara™-induced psoriasiform dermatitis.

Authors:  Siegfried Bezdek; Ashref Hdnah; Tanya Sezin; Sadegh Mousavi; Detlef Zillikens; Saleh Ibrahim; Ralf J Ludwig; Christian D Sadik
Journal:  Exp Dermatol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.960

3.  Imiquimod has strain-dependent effects in mice and does not uniquely model human psoriasis.

Authors:  William R Swindell; Kellie A Michaels; Andrew J Sutter; Doina Diaconu; Yi Fritz; Xianying Xing; Mrinal K Sarkar; Yun Liang; Alex Tsoi; Johann E Gudjonsson; Nicole L Ward
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 11.117

4.  Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies (second edition).

Authors:  Andrea Cossarizza; Hyun-Dong Chang; Andreas Radbruch; Andreas Acs; Dieter Adam; Sabine Adam-Klages; William W Agace; Nima Aghaeepour; Mübeccel Akdis; Matthieu Allez; Larissa Nogueira Almeida; Giorgia Alvisi; Graham Anderson; Immanuel Andrä; Francesco Annunziato; Achille Anselmo; Petra Bacher; Cosima T Baldari; Sudipto Bari; Vincenzo Barnaba; Joana Barros-Martins; Luca Battistini; Wolfgang Bauer; Sabine Baumgart; Nicole Baumgarth; Dirk Baumjohann; Bianka Baying; Mary Bebawy; Burkhard Becher; Wolfgang Beisker; Vladimir Benes; Rudi Beyaert; Alfonso Blanco; Dominic A Boardman; Christian Bogdan; Jessica G Borger; Giovanna Borsellino; Philip E Boulais; Jolene A Bradford; Dirk Brenner; Ryan R Brinkman; Anna E S Brooks; Dirk H Busch; Martin Büscher; Timothy P Bushnell; Federica Calzetti; Garth Cameron; Ilenia Cammarata; Xuetao Cao; Susanna L Cardell; Stefano Casola; Marco A Cassatella; Andrea Cavani; Antonio Celada; Lucienne Chatenoud; Pratip K Chattopadhyay; Sue Chow; Eleni Christakou; Luka Čičin-Šain; Mario Clerici; Federico S Colombo; Laura Cook; Anne Cooke; Andrea M Cooper; Alexandra J Corbett; Antonio Cosma; Lorenzo Cosmi; Pierre G Coulie; Ana Cumano; Ljiljana Cvetkovic; Van Duc Dang; Chantip Dang-Heine; Martin S Davey; Derek Davies; Sara De Biasi; Genny Del Zotto; Gelo Victoriano Dela Cruz; Michael Delacher; Silvia Della Bella; Paolo Dellabona; Günnur Deniz; Mark Dessing; James P Di Santo; Andreas Diefenbach; Francesco Dieli; Andreas Dolf; Thomas Dörner; Regine J Dress; Diana Dudziak; Michael Dustin; Charles-Antoine Dutertre; Friederike Ebner; Sidonia B G Eckle; Matthias Edinger; Pascale Eede; Götz R A Ehrhardt; Marcus Eich; Pablo Engel; Britta Engelhardt; Anna Erdei; Charlotte Esser; Bart Everts; Maximilien Evrard; Christine S Falk; Todd A Fehniger; Mar Felipo-Benavent; Helen Ferry; Markus Feuerer; Andrew Filby; Kata Filkor; Simon Fillatreau; Marie Follo; Irmgard Förster; John Foster; Gemma A Foulds; Britta Frehse; Paul S Frenette; Stefan Frischbutter; Wolfgang Fritzsche; David W Galbraith; Anastasia Gangaev; Natalio Garbi; Brice Gaudilliere; Ricardo T Gazzinelli; Jens Geginat; Wilhelm Gerner; Nicholas A Gherardin; Kamran Ghoreschi; Lara Gibellini; Florent Ginhoux; Keisuke Goda; Dale I Godfrey; Christoph Goettlinger; Jose M González-Navajas; Carl S Goodyear; Andrea Gori; Jane L Grogan; Daryl Grummitt; Andreas Grützkau; Claudia Haftmann; Jonas Hahn; Hamida Hammad; Günter Hämmerling; Leo Hansmann; Goran Hansson; Christopher M Harpur; Susanne Hartmann; Andrea Hauser; Anja E Hauser; David L Haviland; David Hedley; Daniela C Hernández; Guadalupe Herrera; Martin Herrmann; Christoph Hess; Thomas Höfer; Petra Hoffmann; Kristin Hogquist; Tristan Holland; Thomas Höllt; Rikard Holmdahl; Pleun Hombrink; Jessica P Houston; Bimba F Hoyer; Bo Huang; Fang-Ping Huang; Johanna E Huber; Jochen Huehn; Michael Hundemer; Christopher A Hunter; William Y K Hwang; Anna Iannone; Florian Ingelfinger; Sabine M Ivison; Hans-Martin Jäck; Peter K Jani; Beatriz Jávega; Stipan Jonjic; Toralf Kaiser; Tomas Kalina; Thomas Kamradt; Stefan H E Kaufmann; Baerbel Keller; Steven L C Ketelaars; Ahad Khalilnezhad; Srijit Khan; Jan Kisielow; Paul Klenerman; Jasmin Knopf; Hui-Fern Koay; Katja Kobow; Jay K Kolls; Wan Ting Kong; Manfred Kopf; Thomas Korn; Katharina Kriegsmann; Hendy Kristyanto; Thomas Kroneis; Andreas Krueger; Jenny Kühne; Christian Kukat; Désirée Kunkel; Heike Kunze-Schumacher; Tomohiro Kurosaki; Christian Kurts; Pia Kvistborg; Immanuel Kwok; Jonathan Landry; Olivier Lantz; Paola Lanuti; Francesca LaRosa; Agnès Lehuen; Salomé LeibundGut-Landmann; Michael D Leipold; Leslie Y T Leung; Megan K Levings; Andreia C Lino; Francesco Liotta; Virginia Litwin; Yanling Liu; Hans-Gustaf Ljunggren; Michael Lohoff; Giovanna Lombardi; Lilly Lopez; Miguel López-Botet; Amy E Lovett-Racke; Erik Lubberts; Herve Luche; Burkhard Ludewig; Enrico Lugli; Sebastian Lunemann; Holden T Maecker; Laura Maggi; Orla Maguire; Florian Mair; Kerstin H Mair; Alberto Mantovani; Rudolf A Manz; Aaron J Marshall; Alicia Martínez-Romero; Glòria Martrus; Ivana Marventano; Wlodzimierz Maslinski; Giuseppe Matarese; Anna Vittoria Mattioli; Christian Maueröder; Alessio Mazzoni; James McCluskey; Mairi McGrath; Helen M McGuire; Iain B McInnes; Henrik E Mei; Fritz Melchers; Susanne Melzer; Dirk Mielenz; Stephen D Miller; Kingston H G Mills; Hans Minderman; Jenny Mjösberg; Jonni Moore; Barry Moran; Lorenzo Moretta; Tim R Mosmann; Susann Müller; Gabriele Multhoff; Luis Enrique Muñoz; Christian Münz; Toshinori Nakayama; Milena Nasi; Katrin Neumann; Lai Guan Ng; Antonia Niedobitek; Sussan Nourshargh; Gabriel Núñez; José-Enrique O'Connor; Aaron Ochel; Anna Oja; Diana Ordonez; Alberto Orfao; Eva Orlowski-Oliver; Wenjun Ouyang; Annette Oxenius; Raghavendra Palankar; Isabel Panse; Kovit Pattanapanyasat; Malte Paulsen; Dinko Pavlinic; Livius Penter; Pärt Peterson; Christian Peth; Jordi Petriz; Federica Piancone; Winfried F Pickl; Silvia Piconese; Marcello Pinti; A Graham Pockley; Malgorzata Justyna Podolska; Zhiyong Poon; Katharina Pracht; Immo Prinz; Carlo E M Pucillo; Sally A Quataert; Linda Quatrini; Kylie M Quinn; Helena Radbruch; Tim R D J Radstake; Susann Rahmig; Hans-Peter Rahn; Bartek Rajwa; Gevitha Ravichandran; Yotam Raz; Jonathan A Rebhahn; Diether Recktenwald; Dorothea Reimer; Caetano Reis e Sousa; Ester B M Remmerswaal; Lisa Richter; Laura G Rico; Andy Riddell; Aja M Rieger; J Paul Robinson; Chiara Romagnani; Anna Rubartelli; Jürgen Ruland; Armin Saalmüller; Yvan Saeys; Takashi Saito; Shimon Sakaguchi; Francisco Sala-de-Oyanguren; Yvonne Samstag; Sharon Sanderson; Inga Sandrock; Angela Santoni; Ramon Bellmàs Sanz; Marina Saresella; Catherine Sautes-Fridman; Birgit Sawitzki; Linda Schadt; Alexander Scheffold; Hans U Scherer; Matthias Schiemann; Frank A Schildberg; Esther Schimisky; Andreas Schlitzer; Josephine Schlosser; Stephan Schmid; Steffen Schmitt; Kilian Schober; Daniel Schraivogel; Wolfgang Schuh; Thomas Schüler; Reiner Schulte; Axel Ronald Schulz; Sebastian R Schulz; Cristiano Scottá; Daniel Scott-Algara; David P Sester; T Vincent Shankey; Bruno Silva-Santos; Anna Katharina Simon; Katarzyna M Sitnik; Silvano Sozzani; Daniel E Speiser; Josef Spidlen; Anders Stahlberg; Alan M Stall; Natalie Stanley; Regina Stark; Christina Stehle; Tobit Steinmetz; Hannes Stockinger; Yousuke Takahama; Kiyoshi Takeda; Leonard Tan; Attila Tárnok; Gisa Tiegs; Gergely Toldi; Julia Tornack; Elisabetta Traggiai; Mohamed Trebak; Timothy I M Tree; Joe Trotter; John Trowsdale; Maria Tsoumakidou; Henning Ulrich; Sophia Urbanczyk; Willem van de Veen; Maries van den Broek; Edwin van der Pol; Sofie Van Gassen; Gert Van Isterdael; René A W van Lier; Marc Veldhoen; Salvador Vento-Asturias; Paulo Vieira; David Voehringer; Hans-Dieter Volk; Anouk von Borstel; Konrad von Volkmann; Ari Waisman; Rachael V Walker; Paul K Wallace; Sa A Wang; Xin M Wang; Michael D Ward; Kirsten A Ward-Hartstonge; Klaus Warnatz; Gary Warnes; Sarah Warth; Claudia Waskow; James V Watson; Carsten Watzl; Leonie Wegener; Thomas Weisenburger; Annika Wiedemann; Jürgen Wienands; Anneke Wilharm; Robert John Wilkinson; Gerald Willimsky; James B Wing; Rieke Winkelmann; Thomas H Winkler; Oliver F Wirz; Alicia Wong; Peter Wurst; Jennie H M Yang; Juhao Yang; Maria Yazdanbakhsh; Liping Yu; Alice Yue; Hanlin Zhang; Yi Zhao; Susanne Maria Ziegler; Christina Zielinski; Jakob Zimmermann; Arturo Zychlinsky
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 6.688

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.