Literature DB >> 33376834

Multiple evanescent white dot syndrome: Bilateral disease may be silent and asymmetric.

Avni P Finn1, Rahul N Khurana1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We report a patient with unilateral symptoms presenting with bilateral multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS) in order to highlight the utility of multimodal imaging in revealing asymptomatic lesions in the fellow eye and underscore the importance of looking for silent bilateral disease. OBSERVATIONS: A 39-year-old man presented with blurry vision and photopsias in the left eye (OS). Funduscopic examination revealed characteristic granular white dots in the posterior pole OS. Multimodal imaging included fundus autofluorescence, which revealed numerous hyperautofluorescent lesions in both eyes, more than appreciated on clinical examination alone and corresponding ellipsoid disruption on OCT. Seven bilateral cases have been previously reported, all of which are asymmetric, similar to the case reported and are summarized here. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: While MEWDS is most often thought of as a unilateral disease, it may rarely present bilaterally as in the case presented here. Multimodal imaging is especially useful in diagnosis and follow-up. Fundus autofluorescence may be the most sensitive and practical test for detecting MEWDS, revealing lesions in the absence of white dots on clinical exam.
© 2020 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fundus autofluorescence; MEWDS; Multimodal imaging; Oct; Uveitis; White dots

Year:  2020        PMID: 33376834      PMCID: PMC7758516          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2020.101004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep        ISSN: 2451-9936


Introduction

Multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS) is a rare, inflammatory disease most commonly affecting young people between the ages of 15 and 50 years with a 4:1 female to male predilection. Patients often report blurry vision, temporal or paracentral scotoma, dyschromatopsia, and photopsia on initial presentation. Funduscopic examination reveals a quiet anterior chamber, mild vitritis, and multiple granular appearing graying white lesions measuring 100–200 μm throughout the posterior pole that may leave mild foveal granularity upon resolution. Optic disc edema may be present and visual field testing often reveals an enlarged blind spot, temporal, or paracentral scotoma. The clinical course for MEWDS is short and self-limited, with most patients experiencing resolution of symptoms and excellent visual recovery within a few months. MEWDS is typically a unilateral entity, with bilaterality and recurrences being unusual for this disease. We report a rare bilateral presentation of MEWDS and highlight the utility of multimodal imaging in diagnosing the disease and revealing lesions that may not be seen on clinical examination alone. Additionally, this report summarizes previously rarely reported cases of bilateral MEWDS in the literature.

Case report

A healthy 39-year-old man reported blurry vision and photopsias in the left eye (OS) ongoing for one week. He denied any eye redness, pain, or photophobia. His best corrected visual acuity was 20/20 in both eyes (OU). Pupils, intraocular pressure, and confrontational visual fields were normal in both eyes. A slit lamp examination showed a normal anterior segment with a quiet anterior chamber OU. A dilated fundus examination revealed 1+ vitreous cell in the right eye (OD), trace vitreous cell OS, and small yellowish-white spots throughout the posterior pole OU, more prominent OS than OD (Fig. 1A and B). On careful review of systems, the patient reported a recent flu-like illness, but no other systemic symptoms nor exposures. Fluorescein angiography revealed early and late hyperfluorescence of the lesions (Fig. 1C and D) and fundus autofluorescence highlighted the multiple hyperautofluorescent lesions throughout the posterior pole, more numerous than appreciated on examination alone (Fig. 2A and B). Optical coherence tomography through a lesion OS showed disruption of the ellipsoid zone in this area (Fig. 2C).
Fig. 1

Multiple granular white spots are seen in the posterior pole OU (A and B). Fluorescein angiography shows late staining of these lesions (C and D).

Fig. 2

Fundus autofluorescence reveals multiple hyperautofluorescent lesions throughout the posterior pole OU more numerous than appreciated on fundus photography or clinical exam (A and B). OCT though one lesion shows disruption of the ellipsoid zone as delineated by the yellow arrows (C). The hyperautofluorescent lesions resolve on follow-up (D and E) and there is restoration of the ellipsoid zone on OCT (F). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Multiple granular white spots are seen in the posterior pole OU (A and B). Fluorescein angiography shows late staining of these lesions (C and D). Fundus autofluorescence reveals multiple hyperautofluorescent lesions throughout the posterior pole OU more numerous than appreciated on fundus photography or clinical exam (A and B). OCT though one lesion shows disruption of the ellipsoid zone as delineated by the yellow arrows (C). The hyperautofluorescent lesions resolve on follow-up (D and E) and there is restoration of the ellipsoid zone on OCT (F). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.) The patients maintained excellent 20/20 visual acuity OU. His symptoms of blurry vision and photopsias resolved with observation without any recurrences. Repeat imaging three months later showed resolution of FAF and OCT changes (Fig. 2D and E,F).

Discussion

Given the clinical history, examination, and imaging findings, the patient was diagnosed with multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS) with bilateral presentation. As the diagnosis of MEWDS is based on clinical exam alone, no laboratory testing is required. A viral prodrome without any other systemic manifestations may precede the ophthalmic findings. However, multimodal imaging is helpful in diagnosing the disease and differentiating it from other inflammatory and infectious etiologies. MEWDS predominantly affects the outer retina and ellipsoid zone. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) correspondingly demonstrates disruption of the ellipsoid zone in the acute phase of the disease, though the outer nuclear layer and interdigitation zone may also be involved. Fluorescein angiography reveals “wreath-like” early hyperfluorescent spots with late staining and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) demonstrates early and late hypocyanescence. As demonstrated by this case, fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging can nicely highlight the lesions, which appear hyperautofluorescent, and is a useful imaging modality to follow for resolution. Reports suggest FAF may be the most sensitive and practical test for detecting MEWDS, revealing lesions in the absence of white dots on clinical exam. With clinical resolution of the disease, the imaging findings typically resolve with restoration of the photoreceptor outer segments, though there may be persistent granular pigmentary changes on fundoscopy and continued hypocyanescence on ICGA in areas of the previously seen lesions. Corticosteroids and antibiotic treatments are not indicated as MEWDS resolves spontaneously and affected patients are observed for resolution of symptoms and fundoscopic findings. While rare, 10% of patients may experience recurrence and require treatment with immunosuppression. While this entity is typically unilateral, bilateral cases such as that in our patient have been infrequently reported.8, 9, 10, 11, 12 It is notable that in all of these previously reported bilateral cases the disease was asymmetric and more subtle or asymptomatic in the less affected eye (these cases are summarized in Table 1). Six of these previously reported cases occurred in women and 2 in men. All of these bilateral cases were self-limited. Two of the previously reported cases of bilateral disease were separated in presentation by several years. Furthermore, in patients with only unilateral symptoms and clinical disease, there is evidence to suggest that photoreceptor dysfunction and visual field deficits may be found in both eyes despite lack of symptoms. Similar to prior reports of bilateral MEWDS, our patient was only symptomatic in his left eye, but clinical exam and imaging revealed the presence of silent bilateral disease. Given the current case and prior reports, it is plausible bilateral disease is more common on presentation than is recognized, and multimodal imaging may help reveal potentially silent and asymmetric bilateral disease.
Table 1

Previously reported cases of bilateral multiple evanescent white dot syndrome.

First authorAge (years)GenderDescription of bilateral disease
Artola et al.26FBilateral and asynchronous with disease occurring 4 years later in fellow eye
Aaberg et al.44MBilateral and asynchronous with recurrence in contralateral eye separated by 2 years
Aaberg et al.28FBilateral and asymmetric
Aaberg et al.21MBilateral and asymmetric
Meyer et al.14FBilateral and asymmetric
Golshani et al.67FBilateral and older age at presentation
Veronese et al.24FBilateral and asymmetric with 1 week separation in symptoms
Previously reported cases of bilateral multiple evanescent white dot syndrome.

Conclusion

While MEWDS is most often thought of as a unilateral disease, it may rarely present bilaterally as in the case presented here. Fundus autofluorescence is a non-invasive and practical imaging modality that is particularly useful in highlighting lesions that may have otherwise been missed on fundoscopic examination alone. This report highlights the importance of a thorough bilateral exam in patients whom MEWDS is suspected and the clinical utility of multimodal fundus imaging in the diagnosis and monitoring of the disease. We suggest fundus autofluorescence is used in all cases of suspected MEWDS and believe this disease entity may more often be bilateral than previously recognized using clinical examination alone.

Informed consent

The patient consented to publication of the case both orally and in writing. Additionally, this report does not contain any personal information that could lead to the identification of the patient.

Funding

No funding or grant support.

Authorship

All authors attest that they meet the current ICMJE criteria for Authorship.

Financial disclosures

Dr. Avni P. Finn has served as a consultant for Allergan and Genentech. Dr. Rahul N. Khurana has served as a consultant for Alkahest, Allergan, Clearside Biomedical, Genentech and Regeneron; and received grant support from Allergan, Roche, Santen and Clearside Biomedical.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.
  13 in total

Review 1.  White spot syndromes of the retina: a hypothesis based on the common genetic hypothesis of autoimmune/inflammatory disease.

Authors:  Lee M Jampol; Kevin G Becker
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  [Multiple evanescent white-dot syndrome: bilateralization four years later].

Authors:  F Hernández Artola; G Garay Aramburu; S Llorca Pellicer
Journal:  Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol       Date:  2002-07

3.  Multiple evanescent white dot syndrome.

Authors:  Nicole E Gross; Lawrence A Yannuzzi; K Bailey Freund; Richard F Spaide; Gian Paolo Amato; Ruth Sigal
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-04

4.  Relationship between different fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography features in multiple evanescent white dot syndrome.

Authors:  R Dell'omo; R Wong; M Marino; K Konstantopoulou; C Pavesio
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Bilateral multiple evanescent white dot syndrome.

Authors:  Chiara Veronese; Chiara Maiolo; Mariachiara Morara; Grayson W Armstrong; Antonio P Ciardella
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Recurrences and bilaterality in the multiple evanescent white-dot syndrome.

Authors:  R J Meyer; L M Jampol
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-03-15       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Chronic recurrent multiple evanescent white dot syndrome.

Authors:  L Tsai; L M Jampol; S C Pollock; J Olk
Journal:  Retina       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.256

8.  Multiple evanescent white dot syndrome. I. Clinical findings.

Authors:  L M Jampol; P A Sieving; D Pugh; G A Fishman; H Gilbert
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-05

9.  AN ELDERLY PATIENT WITH ACUTE TRANSIENT OUTER RETINAL DISRUPTION RESEMBLING BILATERAL MULTIPLE EVANESCENT WHITE DOT SYNDROME.

Authors:  Cyrus Golshani; Orly Gal-Or; Vincent Giovinazzo; K Bailey Freund
Journal:  Retin Cases Brief Rep       Date:  2020

10.  Restored photoreceptor outer segment damage in multiple evanescent white dot syndrome.

Authors:  Danjie Li; Shoji Kishi
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 12.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.