| Literature DB >> 33376525 |
Jing Zhang1, Gang Yang2, Qiang Li2, Fei Xie3.
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer and third most common cause of cancer-associated mortality worldwide. Hepatectomy and liver transplantation are the main treatments for early HCC. Immunotherapy and targeted therapy for advanced HCC have become increasingly popular; however, their clinical benefits are limited. Thus, identification of novel therapeutic targets for advanced HCC remains essential. Fibrillarin (FBL) is an essential nucleolar protein that catalyzes the 2'-O-methylation of ribosomal RNAs. Recently, experimental data have suggested that FBL can influence breast-cancer progression. However, the association between FBL expression and HCC remains known. In the present study, the UALCAN database was used to assess FBL mRNA expression in HCC. Immunohistochemistry analysis was performed to detect FBL protein expression in 139 patients with HCC. In addition, bioinformatic analysis was performed using the UALCAN, the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery, cBioportal and TargetScan databases. Data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test, and a Cox proportional hazards regression model. The results demonstrated that FBL expression was significantly higher in tumor tissues compared with para-tumor tissues. Furthermore, high FBL expression was significantly associated with tumor diameter and advanced TNM stage in HCC. High FBL expression also predicted a shorter overall survival time and disease-free survival time in patients with HCC. Bioinformatics analysis demonstrated that FBL may be regulated by methylation modification. In addition, analyses of functional annotations using the Gene Ontology database indicated that FBL-related genes were predominantly enriched in DNA repair and proliferation-related cell-signaling pathways. Notably, high FBL expression signified larger tumor diameter, advanced tumor stage and a poor prognosis. Taken together, the results of the present study suggest that FBL may be a potential target for HCC treatment. Copyright: © Zhang et al.Entities:
Keywords: fibrillarin; hepatocellular carcinoma; methylation; prognosis; ribosomal
Year: 2020 PMID: 33376525 PMCID: PMC7751345 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2020.12353
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Figure 1.Overexpression of mRNA and protein FBL in HCC tissues. (A) Analyses of the UALCAN database demonstrated that FBL mRNA expression was higher in HCC tissues compared with normal liver tissues. (B) The UALCAN database was used to assess FBL mRNA expression in different stages of HCC. (C) Representative images depicting FBL protein expression in adjacent tissues and HCC tissues. (D) The χ2 test was used to assess FBL protein expression in HCC tissues and adjacent tissues. *P<0.05, ***P<0.001. FBL, fibrillarin; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; LIHC, liver hepatocellular carcinoma.
Figure 3.Bioinformatics analysis of the potential regulatory mechanism of FBL expression and FBL-related enrichment of gene function. (A) Analysis of 186 significantly associated genes (Person-CC≥0.5) using the Gene Ontology database (only cancer-associated biological processes are presented). (B) Methylation of the promoters of FBL in HCC using the UALCAN database. (C) Analyses of the mutation and amplification of the FBL gene in HCC using the cBioportal database. ***P<0.001. FBL, fibrillarin; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; LIHC, liver hepatocellular carcinoma.
Association between FBL expression and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (n=139).
| Characteristics | No. of patients | High FBL expression (n=64) | Low FBL expression (n=75) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 54.22±10.13 | 53.17±11.20 | 55.12±9.10 | 0.260 |
| <55 | 73 | 35 (47.9%) | 38 (52.1%) | 0.734 |
| ≥55 | 66 | 29 (43.9%) | 37 (56.1%) | |
| Sex | 0.658 | |||
| Male | 114 | 51 (44.7%) | 63 (55.3%) | |
| Female | 25 | 13 (52.0%) | 12 (48.0%) | |
| AFP, ng/ml | 0.724 | |||
| <400 | 88 | 42 (47.7%) | 46 (52.3%) | |
| ≥400 | 51 | 22 (43.1%) | 29 (56.9%) | |
| Child-Pugh | 0.845 | |||
| A | 104 | 47 (45.2%) | 57 (54.8%) | |
| B | 35 | 17 (48.6%) | 18 (51.4%) | |
| HBV infection | 0.327 | |||
| Negative | 35 | 19 (54.3%) | 16 (45.7%) | |
| Positive | 104 | 45 (43.3%) | 59 (56.7%) | |
| Liver cirrhosis | 0.214 | |||
| Absent | 50 | 27 (54.0%) | 23 (46.0%) | |
| Present | 89 | 37 (41.6%) | 52 (58.4%) | |
| Tumor size, cm | 5.39±3.20 | 4.18±2.11 | 6.81±3.65 | <0.001 |
| <5 | 69 | 19 (27.5%) | 50 (72.5%) | <0.001 |
| ≥5 | 70 | 45 (64.3%) | 25 (35.7%) | |
| TNM stage | 0.003 | |||
| I | 82 | 29 (35.4%) | 53 (64.6%) | |
| II–III | 57 | 35 (61.4%) | 22 (38.6%) | |
| Tumor number | 0.227 | |||
| 1 | 119 | 52 (43.7%) | 67 (56.3%) | |
| 2-3 | 20 | 12 (60.0%) | 8 (40.0%) | |
| Tumor differentiation | 0.353 | |||
| Low/moderate | 99 | 43 (43.4%) | 56 (56.6%) | |
| High | 40 | 21 (52.5%) | 19 (47.5%) | |
| Tumor encapsulation | 0.863 | |||
| Complete | 56 | 25 (44.6%) | 31 (55.4%) | |
| Incomplete | 83 | 39 (47.0%) | 44 (53.0%) | |
| Recurrence | 0.159 | |||
| Yes | 107 | 53 (49.5%) | 54 (50.5%) | |
| No | 32 | 11 (34.4%) | 21 (65.6%) | |
| Death | 0.305 | |||
| Yes | 80 | 40 (50.0%) | 40 (50%) | |
| No | 59 | 24 (40.7%) | 35 (59.3%) |
FBL, fibrillarin; AFP, α-fetoprotein; HBV, hepatitis B virus; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis.
Figure 2.High FBL expression is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that patients with high FBL expression had a shorter (A) overall survival time and (B) disease-free survival time. FBL, fibrillarin.
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of the risk factors in hepatocellular carcinoma.
| Univariate | Multivariate | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical features | HR (95% CI) | P-value | HR (95% CI) | P-value |
| Overall survival | ||||
| Sex (male vs. female) | 1.026 (0.565–1.863) | 0.933 | – | – |
| Age, years (≥55 vs. <55) | 0.999 (0.644–1.549) | 0.997 | – | – |
| HBV infection (positive vs. negative) | 1.565 (0.904–2.709) | 0.110 | – | – |
| Liver cirrhosis (present vs. absent) | 1.194 (0.747–1.908) | 0.458 | – | – |
| Child-Pugh (A vs. B) | 1.217 (0.745–1.989) | 0.433 | – | – |
| Tumor number (1 ns. 2–3) | 1.520 (0.866–2.668) | 0.145 | – | – |
| Tumor size, cm (≥5 vs. <5) | 2.799 (1.761–4.447) | <0.001 | 2.232 (1.377–3.610) | 0.001 |
| TNM stage (II–III vs. I) | 2.890 (1.849–4.519) | <0.001 | 2.315 (1.456–3.676) | <0.001 |
| Tumor differentiation (III–IV vs. I–II) | 0.786 (0.473–1.305) | 0.352 | – | – |
| AFP, ng/ml (≥400 vs. <400) | 1.088 (0.690–1.717) | 0.717 | – | – |
| FBL expression (high vs. low) | 1.610 (1.031–2.514) | 0.036 | 1.044 (0.647–1.684) | 0.860 |
| Disease-free survival | ||||
| Sex (male vs. female) | 0.987 (0.594–1.640) | 0.960 | – | – |
| Age, years (≥55 vs. <55) | 1.107 (0.696–1.487) | 0.929 | – | – |
| HBV infection (positive vs. negative) | 1.503 (0.940–2.405) | 0.089 | – | – |
| Liver cirrhosis (present vs. absent) | 1.238 (0.824–1.862) | 0.304 | – | – |
| Child-Pugh (A vs. B) | 1.111 (0.722–1.710) | 0.633 | – | – |
| Tumor number (1 vs. 2–3) | 1.821 (1.105–3.002) | 0.019 | 1.110 (0.630–1.955) | 0.718 |
| Tumor size, cm (≥5 vs. <5) | 2.377 (1.607–3.514) | <0.001 | 2.058 (1.377–3.067) | <0.001 |
| TNM stage (II–III vs. I) | 2.707 (1.830–4.002) | <0.001 | 2.375 (1.690–3.546) | <0.001 |
| Tumor differentiation (III–IV vs. I–II) | 1.208 (0.818–1.786) | 0.342 | – | – |
| AFP, ng/ml (≥400 vs. <400) | 1.165 (0.787–1.724) | 0.447 | – | – |
| FBL expression (high vs. low) | 1.721 (1.169–2.533) | 0.006 | 1.267 (0.834–1.927) | 0.267 |
HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; HBV, hepatitis B virus; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis; AFP, α-fetoprotein; FBL, fibrillarin. ‘−’, not available.