| Literature DB >> 33376432 |
Shanshan Li1, Zhaoqin Wang2, Huangan Wu3, Hongyu Yue1, Ping Yin1, Wei Zhang4, Lixing Lao5, Yiqun Mi1, Shifen Xu1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the short- and long-term effects of acupuncture on perimenopausal insomnia (PMI) and quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We designed a semi-standardized, patient-blinded, randomized placebo-controlled trial. A total of 84 patients were recruited, all of whom met the criteria for diagnosis of PMI. Either acupuncture therapy or a noninvasive placebo acupuncture therapy designed to treat insomnia was implemented 18 times over the course of 8 weeks (3 times per week for 4 weeks, twice per week for 2 weeks, once per week for 2 weeks). The primary outcome was the change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores from baseline to the end of treatment, week 8. Secondary outcomes included climacteric symptoms and quality of life measured by the Menopause Quality of Life (Men-QoL), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), sleep parameters recorded in the actigraphy and adverse events. The PSQI and Men-QoL were assessed at weeks 0, 4, 8, 12 and 20. Other assessments were performed at week 0 and week 8.Entities:
Keywords: acupuncture; perimenopausal insomnia; randomized controlled trial
Year: 2020 PMID: 33376432 PMCID: PMC7764880 DOI: 10.2147/NSS.S282315
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Sci Sleep ISSN: 1179-1608
Figure 1Study flow diagram.
Baseline Characteristics of Participants, by Group
| Characteristics | Acupuncture Group (n=42) | Sham Acupuncture Group (n=42) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean age (SD), y | 52.12(4.19) | 53.07(3.81) | 0.279 |
| Occupational status, n (%) | 0.609 | ||
| Mental activity | 7 (16.67) | 4 (9.52) | |
| Physical activities | 23 (54.76) | 24 (57.14) | |
| Housewife | 12 (28.57) | 14 (33.33) | |
| Educational qualification, n (%) | 0.866 | ||
| Master degree | 2 (4.76) | 3 (7.14) | |
| University degree | 21 (50.00) | 18 (42.86) | |
| Secondary school | 18 (42.86) | 20 (47.62) | |
| Primary school | 1 (2.38) | 1 (2.38) | |
| Duration of insomnia (IQR), m | 39.19 (15.0, 57.0) | 40.21 (16.0, 60.0) | 0.616 |
| Alcohol use, n (%) | 0.494 | ||
| Yes | 2 (4.76) | 0 (0.00) | |
| No | 40 (95.24) | 42 (100.0) | |
| Tea use, n (%) | 0.533 | ||
| Yes | 5(11.90) | 7(16.67) | |
| No | 37(88.10) | 35(83.33) | |
| Coffee use, n (%) | 0.558 | ||
| Yes | 6(14.29) | 8(19.05) | |
| No | 36(85.71) | 34(80.95) | |
| Estazolam use, n (%) | 1.000 | ||
| Yes | 9(21.43) | 10(23.81) | |
| No | 33(78.57) | 32(76.19) | |
| PSQI score (SD) | 10.88(3.23) | 10.64(3.53) | 0.748 |
| Men-QoL score (SD) | |||
| Vasomotor | 4.15(1.66) | 3.58(1.88) | 0.164 |
| Psychosocial | 2.93(1.41) | 3.41(1.39) | 0.057 |
| Physical | 3.27(1.07) | 3.41(1.36) | 0.996 |
| Sexual | 4.46(1.62) | 4.83(1.89) | 0.335 |
| ISI score (SD) | 14.21(3.63) | 13.79(4.01) | 0.609 |
| SAS score (SD) | 46.43(4.45) | 47.43(6.66) | 0.791 |
| SDS score (SD) | 62.93(8.81) | 62.93(4.50) | 1.000 |
| wActiSleep-BT related data (SD) | |||
| TST | 388.27(52.71) | 384.45(43.73) | 0.900 |
| SE | 78.28(9.08) | 78.96(8.77) | 0.655 |
| SA | 23.11(7.43) | 21.49(7.84) | 0.177 |
| AA | 4.79(2.62) | 4.98(2.28) | 0.480 |
| WASO | 94.30(46.20) | 109.57(45.17) | 0.069 |
| TCM syndrome, n (%) | 0.826 | ||
| Kidney yang and yin deficiency | 12 (28.57) | 12 (28.57) | |
| Kidney yang deficiency | 22 (52.38) | 15 (35.71) | |
| Kidney yin deficiency | 8 (19.05) | 15 (35.71) | |
| Expectation of acupuncture, n (%) | 0.135 | ||
| Complete believe | 10 (23.81) | 15 (35.71) | |
| Believe | 26 (61.90) | 24 (57.14) | |
| Little believe | 3 (7.14) | 2 (4.76) | |
| Suspect | 3 (7.14) | 1 (2.38) |
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; Men-QoL, Menopause-specific Quality of Life; ISI, Insomnia Severity Index; SAS, Self-Rating Anxiety Scale; SDS, Self-Rating Depression Scale; TST, total sleep time; SE, sleep efficacy; SA, sleep awakenings; AA, average awakening; WASO, wake after sleep onset; TCM, traditional Chinese medicine.
Changes from Baseline of PSQI and Men-QoL Outcomes at the End of Treatment (8-Week) and the 12-Week and the 20-Week Follow-Up Visits by Group
| Outcome | Acupuncture Group (n=42) | Sham Acupuncture Group (n=42) | Difference Between Groups (95% CI) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |||||
| PSQI score | ||||||||
| Week 4 | −1.93 | 2.15 | −0.98 | 2.28 | −0.95 (−2.03~0.13) | 0.084 | ||
| Week 8 | −3.76 | 2.41 | −1.38 | 2.94 | −2.38 (−3.46~-1.30) | <0.001 | ||
| Week 12 | −4.24 | 2.83 | −0.69 | 2.47 | −3.55 (−4.63~-2.47) | <0.001 | ||
| Week 20 | −4.40 | 3.00 | −0.76 | 2.27 | −3.64 (−4.72~-2.56) | <0.001 | ||
| Men- QoL score | ||||||||
| Vasomotor | ||||||||
| Week 4 | −0.46 | 1.24 | −0.03 | 0.82 | −0.43 (−0.89~0.03) | 0.066 | ||
| Week 8 | −1.13 | 1.18 | 0.10 | 1.00 | −1.22 (−1.70~-0.75) | <0.001 | ||
| Week 12 | −0.97 | 1.22 | 0.30 | 0.81 | −1.27 (−1.72~-0.82) | <0.001 | ||
| Week 20 | −1.15 | 1.15 | 0.20 | 0.66 | −1.35 (−1.76~-0.94) | <0.001 | ||
| Psychosocial | ||||||||
| Week 4 | −0.32 | 0.82 | −0.23 | 0.84 | −0.09 (−0.45~0.27) | 0.613 | ||
| Week 8 | −0.53 | 0.89 | −0.33 | 1.09 | −0.20 (−0.63~0.23) | 0.365 | ||
| Week 12 | −0.47 | 0.81 | −0.18 | 1.01 | −0.29 (−0.69~0.11) | 0.152 | ||
| Week 20 | −0.45 | 0.91 | −0.10 | 0.94 | −0.36 (−0.76~0.04) | 0.081 | ||
| Physical | ||||||||
| Week 4 | −0.62 | 0.86 | −0.22 | 0.70 | −0.40 (−0.75~-0.06) | 0.021 | ||
| Week 8 | −0.84 | 0.93 | −0.15 | 0.88 | −0.69 (−1.09~-0.30) | <0.001 | ||
| Week 12 | −0.78 | 0.79 | 0.02 | 0.66 | −0.80 (−1.12~-0.49) | <0.001 | ||
| Week 20 | −0.74 | 0.91 | 0.11 | 0.55 | −0.85 (−1.18~-0.53) | <0.001 | ||
| Sexual | ||||||||
| Week 4 | 0.03 | 0.87 | −0.16 | 1.09 | 0.19 (−0.24~0.62) | 0.377 | ||
| Week 8 | −0.13 | 1.14 | −0.23 | 0.97 | 0.10 (−0.36~0.56) | 0.682 | ||
| Week 12 | −0.10 | 1.21 | 0.04 | 0.95 | −0.14 (−0.61~0.34) | 0.571 | ||
| Week 20 | 0.06 | 1.31 | 0.29 | 0.97 | −0.23 (−0.74~0.26) | 0.345 | ||
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval; PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; Men-QoL, Menopause-specific Quality of Life.
Figure 2Adjusted mean (95% CI) change from baseline in PSQI scores.
Seven Components of PSQI Changes from Baseline to the End of Treatment (8-Week) and the 12-Week and the 20-Week Follow-Up Visits by Group
| Outcome | Acupuncture Group (n=42) | Sham Acupuncture Group (n=42) | Difference Between Groups (95% CI) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||||
| PSQI score | |||||||
| Sleep quality | |||||||
| Week 4 | −0.46 | 0.67 | −0.26 | 0.77 | −0.20 (−0.50~0.10) | 0.188 | |
| Week 8 | −0.90 | 0.58 | −0.38 | 0.79 | −0.52 (−0.82~-0.22) | <0.001 | |
| Week 12 | −0.93 | 0.61 | −0.26 | 0.73 | −0.67 (−0.97~-0.36) | <0.001 | |
| Week 20 | −0.98 | 0.65 | −0.17 | 0.70 | −0.81 (−1.11~-0.51) | <0.001 | |
| Sleep latency | |||||||
| Week 4 | −0.15 | 0.79 | −0.31 | 0.75 | 0.16 (−0.17~0.50) | 0.337 | |
| Week 8 | −0.49 | 0.81 | −0.29 | 0.81 | −0.20 (−0.54~0.13) | 0.234 | |
| Week 12 | −0.71 | 0.81 | −0.17 | 0.82 | −0.54 (−0.87~-0.21) | 0.002 | |
| Week 20 | −0.66 | 0.73 | −0.14 | 0.75 | −0.52 (−0.85~-0.18) | 0.003 | |
| Sleep duration | |||||||
| Week 4 | −0.39 | 0.59 | −0.05 | 0.54 | −0.34 (−0.62~-0.07) | 0.015 | |
| Week 8 | −0.78 | 0.69 | −0.07 | 0.60 | −0.71 (−0.98~-0.43) | <0.001 | |
| Week 12 | −0.78 | 0.76 | 0.12 | 0.55 | −0.90 (−1.17~-0.62) | <0.001 | |
| Week 20 | −0.85 | 0.85 | 0.07 | 0.46 | −0.92 (−1.20~-0.65) | <0.001 | |
| Habitual sleep efficiency | |||||||
| Week 4 | −0.59 | 1.14 | −0.10 | 0.66 | −0.49 (−0.90~-0.08) | 0.019 | |
| Week 8 | −1.07 | 1.01 | −0.12 | 0.86 | −0.95 (−1.36~-0.54) | <0.001 | |
| Week 12 | −1.05 | 1.07 | −0.02 | 0.84 | −1.03 (−1.43~-0.61) | <0.001 | |
| Week 20 | −1.05 | 1.12 | −0.05 | 0.79 | −1.00 (−1.41~-0.59) | <0.001 | |
| Sleep disturbance | |||||||
| Week 4 | −0.36 | 0.66 | −0.12 | 0.59 | −0.24 (−0.51~0.03) | 0.085 | |
| Week 8 | −0.50 | 0.63 | −0.17 | 0.62 | −0.33 (−0.60~-0.06) | 0.016 | |
| Week 12 | −0.50 | 0.67 | −0.10 | 0.62 | −0.40 (−0.68~-0.13) | 0.004 | |
| Week 20 | −0.52 | 0.63 | −0.12 | 0.63 | −0.40 (−0.68~-0.13) | 0.004 | |
| Use of sleeping medication | |||||||
| Week 4 | −0.05 | 0.22 | −0.17 | 0.76 | 0.12 (−0.23~0.47) | 0.504 | |
| Week 8 | −0.05 | 0.62 | −0.29 | 0.92 | 0.24 (−0.11~0.59) | 0.182 | |
| Week 12 | −0.12 | 1.04 | −0.24 | 0.85 | 0.12 (−0.23~0.47) | 0.504 | |
| Week 20 | −0.14 | 0.90 | −0.36 | 1.03 | 0.21 (−0.14~0.57) | 0.230 | |
| Daytime dysfunction | |||||||
| Week 4 | −0.17 | 0.49 | −0.26 | 0.54 | 0.09 (−0.19~0.38) | 0.511 | |
| Week 8 | −0.24 | 0.62 | −0.36 | 0.73 | 0.12 (−0.17~0.40) | 0.411 | |
| Week 12 | −0.43 | 0.70 | −0.31 | 0.64 | −0.12 (−0.40~0.17) | 0.411 | |
| Week 20 | −0.48 | 0.86 | −0.29 | 0.67 | −0.19 (−0.48~0.09) | 0.189 | |
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval; PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.
Actigraphy Assessments at Baseline and the End of Treatment (Week 8) by Group
| Outcome | Acupuncture Group (n=42) | Sham Acupuncture Group (n=42) | Difference Between Groups (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |||
| TST | ||||||
| Baseline | 388.27 | 52.71 | 384.45 | 43.73 | – | 0.900 |
| Week 8 | 405.64 | 61.19 | 372.39 | 47.84 | 28.80 (7.75~49.84) | 0.007* |
| SE | ||||||
| Baseline | 78.28 | 9.08 | 78.96 | 8.77 | – | 0.655 |
| Week 8 | 81.14 | 7.89 | 76.61 | 9.28 | 5.16(2.00~8.32) | 0.023* |
| SA | ||||||
| Baseline | 23.11 | 7.43 | 21.49 | 7.84 | – | 0.177 |
| Week 8 | 21.50 | 6.02 | 20.83 | 7.02 | −0.95(−4.58~2.68) | 0.639 |
| AA | ||||||
| Baseline | 4.79 | 2.62 | 4.98 | 2.28 | – | 0.480 |
| Week 8 | 4.19 | 1.59 | 5.35 | 2.45 | −0.97(−1.90~-0.05) | 0.011* |
| WASO | ||||||
| Baseline | 103.00 | 47.56 | 101.41 | 48.01 | - | 0.671 |
| Week 8 | 94.30 | 46.20 | 109.57 | 45.17 | −16.73(−34.50~1.03) | 0.069 |
Note: *P<0.05.
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; TST, total sleep time; SE, sleep efficacy; SA, sleep awakenings; AA, average awakening; WASO, wake after sleep onset.
ISI, SAS and SDS Outcomes at Baseline and the End of Treatment (Week 8) by Group
| Outcome | Acupuncture Group (n=42) | Sham Acupuncture Group (n=42) | Difference Between Groups (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |||
| ISI | ||||||
| Baseline | 14.21 | 3.63 | 13.79 | 4.01 | – | 0.609 |
| Week 8 | 8.86 | 3.88 | 12.50 | 5.15 | −4.10(−5.61~-2.58) | <0.001* |
| SAS | ||||||
| Baseline | 46.43 | 4.45 | 47.43 | 6.66 | - | 0.791 |
| Week 8 | 44.98 | 3.85 | 48.10 | 6.04 | −2.07(−3.90~-0.24) | 0.007* |
| SDS | ||||||
| Baseline | 62.93 | 8.81 | 62.93 | 4.50 | - | 1.000 |
| Week 8 | 62.38 | 5.49 | 63.57 | 5.23 | −1.09(−3.74~1.55) | 0.218 |
Note: *P<0.05.
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; ISI, Insomnia Severity Index; SAS, Self-Rating Anxiety Scale; SDS, Self-Rating Depression Scale.
Use of Estazolam for Insomnia, by Group, n (%)
| Group Allocation | Baseline (Yes) | Baseline (No) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Follow-Up (Yes) | Follow-Up (No) | Follow-Up (Yes) | Follow-Up (No) | |
| Acupuncture (n = 42) | 6(14.3) | 3(7.1) | 0(0) | 33(78.6) |
| Sham acupuncture (n = 42) | 10(23.8) | 0(0) | 1(2.4) | 31(73.8) |
Results of the Blinding, by Group
| Group Allocation | Treatment Guess After End of Treatment, n (%) | Bang Blinding Index (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acupuncture | Sham Acupuncture | Unsure | ||
| Acupuncture (n = 42) | 18(42.8)* | 2(4.8) | 22(52.4) | 0.38(0.21 to 0.55) |
| Sham acupuncture (n = 42) | 15(35.7) | 9(21.4)* | 18(42.9) | −0.14(−0.36 to 0.08) |
Note: *Correct guess.
Adverse Events, by Group, n (%)
| Group Allocation | Acupuncture (n = 42) | Sham Acupuncture (n = 42) |
|---|---|---|
| Adverse events reported, n (%) | 2(4.8) | 1(2.4) |
| Adverse events (intensity), n | ||
| Bleeding | 1(mild) | 0 |
| Pain | 1(mild) | 1(mild) |