Literature DB >> 33376175

Systematic examination of preprint platforms for use in the medical and biomedical sciences setting.

Jamie J Kirkham1, Naomi C Penfold2, Fiona Murphy3, Isabelle Boutron4, John P Ioannidis5, Jessica Polka2, David Moher6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review is to identify all preprint platforms with biomedical and medical scope and to compare and contrast the key characteristics and policies of these platforms. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: Preprint platforms that were launched up to 25 June 2019 and have a biomedical and medical scope according to MEDLINE's journal selection criteria were identified using existing lists, web-based searches and the expertise of both academic and non-academic publication scientists. A data extraction form was developed, pilot tested and used to collect data from each preprint platform's webpage(s).
RESULTS: A total of 44 preprint platforms were identified as having biomedical and medical scope, 17 (39%) were hosted by the Open Science Framework preprint infrastructure, 6 (14%) were provided by F1000 Research (the Open Research Central infrastructure) and 21 (48%) were other independent preprint platforms. Preprint platforms were either owned by non-profit academic groups, scientific societies or funding organisations (n=28; 64%), owned/partly owned by for-profit publishers or companies (n=14; 32%) or owned by individuals/small communities (n=2; 5%). Twenty-four (55%) preprint platforms accepted content from all scientific fields although some of these had restrictions relating to funding source, geographical region or an affiliated journal's remit. Thirty-three (75%) preprint platforms provided details about article screening (basic checks) and 14 (32%) of these actively involved researchers with context expertise in the screening process. Almost all preprint platforms allow submission to any peer-reviewed journal following publication, have a preservation plan for read access and most have a policy regarding reasons for retraction and the sustainability of the service.
CONCLUSION: A large number of preprint platforms exist for use in biomedical and medical sciences, all of which offer researchers an opportunity to rapidly disseminate their research findings onto an open-access public server, subject to scope and eligibility. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  medical ethics; medical journalism; statistics & research methods

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33376175      PMCID: PMC7778769          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


  9 in total

1.  Biomedical Journals and Preprint Services: Friends or Foes?

Authors:  Thomas Annesley; Mitchell Scott; Hilda Bastian; Vivian Fonseca; John P A Ioannidis; Michael A Keller; Jessica Polka
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 2.  Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies.

Authors:  T Jefferson; M Rudin; S Brodney Folse; F Davidoff
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18

3.  Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study.

Authors:  Sally Hopewell; Gary S Collins; Isabelle Boutron; Ly-Mee Yu; Jonathan Cook; Milensu Shanyinde; Rose Wharton; Larissa Shamseer; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-07-01

4.  Exploring issues in the conduct of website searching and other online sources for systematic reviews: how can we be systematic?

Authors:  Claire Stansfield; Kelly Dickson; Mukdarut Bangpan
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-15

5.  The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise.

Authors:  Michail Kovanis; Raphaël Porcher; Philippe Ravaud; Ludovic Trinquart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rachel Bruce; Anthony Chauvin; Ludovic Trinquart; Philippe Ravaud; Isabelle Boutron
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 8.775

7.  Should there be greater use of preprint servers for publishing reports of biomedical science?

Authors:  Iain Chalmers; Paul Glasziou
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-03-03

8.  Who and why do researchers opt to publish in post-publication peer review platforms? - findings from a review and survey of F1000 Research.

Authors:  Jamie Kirkham; David Moher
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-06-27
  9 in total
  12 in total

1.  A learning health system approach to the COVID-19 pandemic: System-wide changes in clinical practice and 30-day mortality among hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Erin K McCreary; Kevin E Kip; J Ryan Bariola; Mark Schmidhofer; Tami Minnier; Katelyn Mayak; Debbie Albin; Jessica Daley; Kelsey Linstrum; Erik Hernandez; Rachel Sackrowitz; Kailey Hughes; Christopher Horvat; Graham M Snyder; Bryan J McVerry; Donald M Yealy; David T Huang; Derek C Angus; Oscar C Marroquin
Journal:  Learn Health Syst       Date:  2022-01-27

2.  Open Science in Kenya: Where Are We?

Authors:  Kennedy W Mwangi; Nyabuti Mainye; Daniel O Ouso; Kevin Esoh; Angela W Muraya; Charles K Mwangi; Careen Naitore; Pauline Karega; Gilbert Kibet-Rono; Sebastian Musundi; Jennifer Mutisya; Elizabeth Mwangi; Cavin Mgawe; Silviane Miruka; Caleb K Kibet
Journal:  Front Res Metr Anal       Date:  2021-05-13

3.  Identifying and addressing psychosocial determinants of adherence to physical distancing guidance during the COVID-19 pandemic - project protocol.

Authors:  Hannah Durand; Simon L Bacon; Molly Byrne; Eanna Kenny; Kim L Lavoie; Brian E McGuire; Jenny Mc Sharry; Oonagh Meade; Robert Mooney; Chris Noone; Laura L O'Connor; Kate O'Flaherty; Gerard J Molloy
Journal:  HRB Open Res       Date:  2020-12-14

Review 4.  How COVID-19 has fundamentally changed clinical research in global health.

Authors:  Jay J H Park; Robin Mogg; Gerald E Smith; Etheldreda Nakimuli-Mpungu; Fyezah Jehan; Craig R Rayner; Jeanine Condo; Eric H Decloedt; Jean B Nachega; Gilmar Reis; Edward J Mills
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 38.927

5.  Using Preprints in Evidence Synthesis: Commentary on experience during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Barbara Clyne; Kieran A Walsh; Eamon O'Murchu; Melissa K Sharp; Laura Comber; Kirsty K O' Brien; Susan M Smith; Patricia Harrington; Michelle O'Neill; Conor Teljeur; Máirín Ryan
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Open data and data sharing in articles about COVID-19 published in preprint servers medRxiv and bioRxiv.

Authors:  Josip Strcic; Antonia Civljak; Terezija Glozinic; Rafael Leite Pacheco; Tonci Brkovic; Livia Puljak
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.801

7.  Reliability of citations of medRxiv preprints in articles published on COVID-19 in the world leading medical journals.

Authors:  Jean-Francois Gehanno; Julien Grosjean; Stefan J Darmoni; Laetitia Rollin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  A guide to preprinting for early-career researchers.

Authors:  Cassandra L Ettinger; Madhumala K Sadanandappa; Kıvanç Görgülü; Karen L Coghlan; Kenneth K Hallenbeck; Iratxe Puebla
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 2.643

9.  COVID-19 during pregnancy and risk of pregnancy loss (miscarriage or stillbirth): a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Jennifer Campbell; Rachael Williams; Mia Harley; Krishnan Bhaskaran
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.006

10.  Transparency and reporting characteristics of COVID-19 randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Philipp Kapp; Laura Esmail; Lina Ghosn; Philippe Ravaud; Isabelle Boutron
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 11.150

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.