Literature DB >> 33376174

Cross-sectional association between long working hours and liver function: the Kangbuk Samsung Health Study.

Eunchan Mun1, Woncheol Lee1, Min-Woo Nam1, Hyun-Il Kim1, Hyeongcheol Kim1, Yesung Lee1, Soyoung Park2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although the effects of long working hours on liver function remain unclear, in South Korea, there is a social perception that long working hours are associated with poor liver function. Thus, long working hours have recently become a major issue. This study aimed to determine the association between long working hours and liver function, as indicated by the alanine transaminase (ALT) levels.
<span class="abstract_title">DESIGN:
Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Large university hospitals in Seoul and Suwon, South Korea. PARTICIPANTS: Workers in formal employment who underwent a comprehensive health examination at the Kangbuk Samsung Hospital Total Healthcare Centre clinics in Seoul and Suwon, South Korea, between January 2011 and December 2018. Of the 386 488 participants, 212 421 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: ALT elevation.
RESULTS: The participants were predominantly well-educated (86.1%), male (69.3%) and in their 30s (49.6%). In total, 13.4% of the participants presented ALT elevation (>40 IU/L). There was no significant association between working hours and ALT elevation in the general population and in the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative group. Conversely, in the HBsAg-positive group, working >60 hours per week compared with 35-40 hours per week was significantly associated with ALT elevation. The association was more pronounced in those with ALT levels >80 IU/L (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.24 to 3.01) than in those with ALT levels >40 IU/L (OR: 1.45, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.75). The p values for trend were <0.05.
CONCLUSIONS: Long working hours were associated with ALT elevation only in hepatitis B virus carriers and not in the general population. Provided that there is adherence to the legal working hours, there is no need to further restrict working hours for liver health, irrespective of HBsAg status. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hepatology; occupational & industrial medicine; public health

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33376174      PMCID: PMC7778760          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


This study investigated a large sample size of 212 421 participants for cross-sectional analyses. We adjusted the analyses for personal behavioural, social and occupational factors drawn from clinical records. We stratified the study group and analysed the modification of effect by the hepatitis B surface antigen-positive status, which is relatively difficult to measure. The generalisability of the study findings should be verified, as the study included well-educated Korean men and <span class="Species">women in formal employment. The cross-sectional nature of the study design makes it difficult to determine causal inference.

Background

Long working hours have recently become a major issue in South Korea. In 2018, the average working time of Korean workers was the third longest among the member countries of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.1 Previous studies have shown that long working hours could be associated with various clinical diseases, such as <span class="Disease">coronary heart disease, depression,2 diabetes mellitus,3 4 non-alcoholic fatty liver disease,5 atrial fibrillation,6 hypertension7 8 and stroke.9 Although the effects of long working hours on liver function remain unclear, in South Korea, there is a social perception that long working hours are associated with poor liver function. Interestingly, in South Korea, there have been growing concerns regarding the potential for impaired liver function due to long working hours. The Ministry of Employ<span class="Species">ment and Labour has failed to recognise most of these claims. However, the Supreme Court has ruled that long working hours were the main cause of death in a worker who died after exacerbation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in July 2001. Since then, there has been a general perception among employers that HBV carriers are more vulnerable to the effects of long working hours than other workers, resulting in discrimination in hiring against HBV carriers.10 Moreover, some studies have shown that long working hours are associated with work-related psychosocial stress,11 12 which may lead to adverse effects on liver function through immune-mediated <span class="Disease">inflammation.13–17 Thus, long working hours can be considered to adversely affect liver function by increasing exposure to work-related psychosocial stress. However, few studies to date have investigated the effects of long working hours on liver function. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the association between long working hours and liver function, as indicated by the alanine transaminase (ALT) levels, in the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive and HBsAg-negative groups.

Methods

Ethical considerations

The requirement for informed consent was waived owing to the use of deidentified data.

Study design and participants

We conducted a cross-sectional study including participants of the Kangbuk Samsung Health Study who underwent a comprehensive health examination at the Kangbuk Samsung Hospital Total Healthcare Centre clinics in Seoul and Suwon, South Korea, between January 2011 and December 2018 (n=386 488). The exclusion criteria were as follows: working <35 hours per week; missing data on working hours; history of <span class="Disease">cancer; administration of hepatotonics or antivirals against viral hepatitis; aspartate transaminase (AST)/ALT ratio >2, which is one of the specific findings of advanced alcoholic liver disease associated with excessive alcohol consumption18; and missing data on any covariates. In total, 212 421 full-time workers were included in the analysis (figure 1).
Figure 1

Participant selection flow chart. ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate transaminase.

Participant selection flow chart. ALT, alanine transaminase; <span class="Gene">AST, aspartate transaminase.

Measurement of variables

Data on age, sex, smoking status, alcohol consumption, exercise habits, medication, marital status, education level and occupational information were obtained using a self-administered questionnaire. Clinical factors, such as height, body weight and waist circumference, were measured by trained nurses, and blood parameters were measured using venous blood samples collected from the antecubital vein after ≥10 hours of f<span class="Gene">asting. The HBsAg status and serum insulin levels were determined using electrochemiluminescent immunoassays (Modular E170; Roche Diagnostics) between 2011 and 2015 and the Cobas Integra 8000 (Roche Diagnostics) analyser thereafter. The serum total <span class="Chemical">cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglyceride levels were measured via an enzymatic colorimetric assay. The serum fasting glucose levels were measured using the hexokinase method on the Cobas Integra 800 system (Roche Diagnostics). Similarly, the haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels were measured using an immunoturbidimetric assay with the Cobas Integra 800 automatic analyser (Roche Diagnostics). Insulin resistance was assessed using the homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) according to the following equation: fasting blood insulin (µU/mL)×fasting serum glucose (mmol/L) / 22.5.19 Moreover, the ALT levels were also measured using the Cobas Integra 800 (Roche Diagnostics) analyser. ALT elevation was defined as >40 or >80 IU/L (two times the upper normal limit). All laboratory tests were conducted at The Laboratory Medicine Department of Kangbuk Samsung Hoemical">spital in Seoul, South Korea, which has been accredited by the Korean Society of Laboratory Medicine and the Korean Association of Quality Assurance for Clinical Laboratories. The laboratory participates in the College of American Pathologists Survey Proficiency Testing.

Definition of working hours

Working hours were categorised based on the Korean Labour Standards Act, which defines 40 hours as the legal number of working hours per week and 52 hours as the maximum limit, including overtime.20 The categorisation was also based on the Korean Enforcement Decree of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act and Public Notice of Korean Ministry of Employment and Labour, which considers cerebrovascular and cardiovascular diseases caused by chronically long working hours as occupational diseases when the average number of working hours per week within the 12 week period immediately preceding a disease event is >60 hours.21 22 Accordingly, working hours in this study were classified into 35–40, 41–52, 53–60 and >60 hours per week, with long working hours defined as >60 hours per week.

Primary outcome measure of liver function

We adopted ALT levels as an indicator of liver function because they are commonly used and are clearly associated with the status and prognosis of liver disease. We set the following two cut-off values for ALT elevation: >40 and >80 IU/L, corresponding to mild and moderate elevation, respectively.

Statistical analyses

A Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test was performed. Non-normally distributed continuous variables were expressed as medians and IQRs and analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were expressed as numbers and percentages (%) and analysed using the χ2 test. Binary logistic regression was used to determine the association between working hours and ALT elevation (>40 or >80 IU/L) by the HBsAg status, and the results were expressed as ORs with 95% CIs. We performed bivariate logistic regression analysis, followed by age and sex adjustment and further multivariate adjustment for factors, such as smoking status, alcohol intake, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, HDL-C, LDL-C, triglyceride levels, marital status, education level and night shift work. We additionally assessed the combined effects of exposure to long working hours and HBsAg-positive status with respect to ALT elevation (>40 or >80 IU/L) by calculating the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) and the ratio of ORs. RERIs were calculated using the following formula: RERI=OR(combined exposure to long working hours and HBsAg-positive status) – OR(exposure to long working hours only) – OR(exposure to HBsAg-positive status only)+1.23 A RERI value >0 indicated a positive interaction on the additive scale. The ratios of ORs were calculated using the following formula: OR ratio=OR(combined exposure to long working hours and HBsAg-positive status) / (OR[exposure to long working hours only]×OR[exposure to HBsAg-positive status only]). An OR ratio >1 indicated a positive interaction on the multiplicative scale. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (V.24.0). A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Patient and public involvement

Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting or dissemination plans of this research.

Results

Participant characteristics

The median age was 36 (IQR 31–42) years, and the majority (69.3%) of participants were <span class="Species">men. Most of them were married (73.7%), well educated (86.1%) and white-collar workers (90.0%). In total, 13.4% of participants had elevated ALT levels (>40 IU/L). There were significant differences in age, sex, smoking status, alcohol intake, marital status, education level, night shift work, HOMA-IR, BMI, waist circumference, HBsAg status, medication and working hours, and in total cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, triglyceride, glucose and HbA1c levels between the elevated and normal ALT groups (table 1).
Table 1

General characteristics of the study participants

CharacteristicTotalALT (IU/L)P value
Normal (≤40)Elevated (>40)
n (%)212 421184 054 (86.6)28 367 (13.4)
Age (years)36 (31–42)35 (30–42)36 (32–42)<0.001
Sex (% male)69.365.494.4<0.001
Current smoker (%)25.123.535.7<0.001
Alcohol intake (g/day)7 (3–21)7 (3–20)11 (4–29)<0.001
Exercise (% yes)40.140.239.80.21
Marital status(% married)73.773.077.7<0.001
Education level(% college or higher)86.186.087.2<0.001
Night shift work (%)10.810.910.2<0.001
Glucose (mg/dL)93 (88–99)93 (88–98)97 (91–104)<0.001
HbA1c (%)5.5 (5.3–5.7)5.5 (5.3–5.7)5.6 (5.4–5.8)<0.001
HOMA-IR1.31 (0.87–1.95)1.23 (0.83–0.79)2.11 (1.41–3.13)<0.001
BMI (kg/m2)23.5 (21.3–25.7)23.1 (21.0–25.2)26.4 (24.4–28.6)<0.001
Waist circumference (cm)83 (76–89)81 (75–88)91 (86–97)<0.001
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)191 (170–215)189 (168–212)206 (183–231)<0.001
HDL-C (mg/dL)56 (47–67)58 (48–69)47 (40–55)<0.001
LDL-C (mg/dL)121 (100–143)118 (98–140)138 (116–161)<0.001
Triglycerides (mg/dL)94 (66–141)88 (63–130)147 (103–208)<0.001
HBsAg (% positive)2.62.34.1<0.001
Medication (% any)13.012.416.9<0.001
Occupation (% white collar)90.090.189.1<0.001
Working hours per week (%)50 (42–52)49 (40–52)50 (45–55)<0.001
 35–4024.625.220.3<0.001*
 41–5251.251.351.2
 53–6016.916.519.6
 >607.37.09.0

Data are presented as medians (IQR) or numbers (percentage).

*4×2 χ2 test.

ALT, alanine transaminase; BMI, body mass index; HbA1c, haemoglobin A1c; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

General characteristics of the study participants Data are presented as medians (IQR) or numbers (percentage). *4×2 χ2 test. ALT, alanine transaminase; BMI, body mass index; HbA1c, haemoglobin A1c; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein <span class="Chemical">cholesterol; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Association between working hours and ALT elevation by the HBsAg status

In the fully adjusted logistic regression model, there was no significant association between the working hours and ALT elevation (>40 or >80 IU/L) in the general population and in the HBsAg-negative group. Conversely, in the HBsAg-positive group, working >60 hours compared with 35–40 hours per week was significantly associated with ALT elevation. The association was more pronounced in those with ALT levels >80 IU/L (OR: 1.94, 95% CI 1.24 to 3.01) than in those with ALT levels >40 IU/L (OR: 1.45, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.75). Interestingly, the p values for trend were both <0.05 (table 2).
Table 2

Association between working hours and ALT elevation by HBsAg status

Working hours per weekCrude modelAge and sex adjustedMultivariate adjusted
General population
ALT elevation (>40 IU/L)
 35–401.00 (Ref.)1.00 (Ref.)1.00 (Ref.)
 41–521.24 (1.20 to 1.28)0.92 (0.89 to 0.95)0.95 (0.92 to 0.99)
 53–601.47 (1.41 to 1.53)0.99 (0.95 to 1.03)1.00 (0.96 to 1.05)
 >601.59 (1.51 to 1.67)1.07 (1.01 to 1.12)1.06 (1.00 to 1.12)
ALT elevation (>80 IU/L)
 35–401.00 (Ref.)1.00 (Ref.)1.00 (Ref.)
 41–521.27 (1.18 to 1.37)0.90 (0.84 to 0.97)0.95 (0.88 to 1.02)
 53–601.48 (1.35 to 1.61)0.95 (0.87 to 1.04)0.97 (0.89 to 1.07)
 >601.64 (1.47 to 1.83)1.05 (0.94 to 1.17)1.03 (0.92 to 1.15)
HBsAg-negative group
ALT elevation (>40 IU/L)
 35–401.00 (Ref.)1.00 (Ref.)1.00 (Ref.)
 41–521.24 (1.20 to 1.28)0.92 (0.89 to 0.95)0.95 (0.92 to 0.99)
 53–601.48 (1.42 to 1.54)0.99 (0.95 to 1.03)1.00 (0.95 to 1.04)
 >601.58 (1.50 to 1.66)1.05 (1.00 to 1.11)1.05 (0.99 to 1.11)
ALT elevation (>80 IU/L)
 35–401.00 (Ref.)1.00 (Ref.)1.00 (Ref.)
 41–521.27 (1.18 to 1.37)0.90 (0.83 to 0.97)0.94 (0.87 to 1.02)
 53–601.49 (1.36 to 1.63)0.95 (0.87 to 1.04)0.97 (0.88 to 1.07)
 >601.60 (1.43 to 1.79)1.01 (0.90 to 1.13)0.99 (0.88 to 1.11)
HBsAg-positive group
ALT elevation (>40 IU/L)
 35–401.00 (Ref.)1.00 (Ref.)1.00 (Ref.)
 41–521.25 (1.06 to 1.47)0.96 (0.81 to 1.14)1.00 (0.84 to 1.19)
 53–601.39 (1.13 to 1.70)1.00 (0.80 to 1.23)1.03 (0.83 to 1.28)
 >601.96 (1.52 to 2.52)1.42 (1.09 to 1.85)1.45 (1.20 to 1.75)*
ALT elevation (>80 IU/L)
 35–401.00 (Ref.)1.00 (Ref.)1.00 (Ref.)
 41–521.29 (0.94 to 1.78)1.05 (0.75 to 1.45)1.07 (0.77 to 1.49)
 53–601.33 (0.90 to 1.97)1.02 (0.68 to 1.52)1.02 (0.68 to 1.54)
 >602.50 (1.63 to 3.84)1.93 (1.24 to 3.00)1.94 (1.24 to 3.01)*

The multivariate model was adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, alcohol intake, marital status, education level, night shift work, BMI, waist circumference, HDL-C levels, LDL-C levels and triglyceride levels.

*P for trend <0.05.

ALT, alanine transaminase; BMI, body mass index; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; Ref., reference.

Association between working hours and ALT elevation by HBsAg status The multivariate model was adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, alcohol intake, marital status, education level, night shift work, BMI, waist circumference, HDL-C levels, LDL-C levels and <span class="Chemical">triglyceride levels. *P for trend <0.05. ALT, alanine transaminase; BMI, body mass index; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein <span class="Chemical">cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; Ref., reference.

Modification of the effect of long working hours on ALT elevation by the HBsAg-positive status

The HBsAg-positive status showed a positive effect modification on ALT elevation from exposure to working >60 hours per week. For ALT levels >40 IU/L, the RERI was 0.67 and the ratio of ORs was 1.28. For ALT levels >80 IU/L, the RERI was 1.65, and the ratio of ORs was 1.65. Thus, the effect modification was positive on the additive and multiplicative scales, and the positive effect modification was more pronounced when the ALT levels were >80 IU/L than >40 IU/L (table 3).
Table 3

Modification of the effect of long working hours (>60 hours per week) on ALT elevation by the HBsAg-positive status

HBsAg-positive statusWorking 35–60 hours per weekWorking >60 hours per weekOR (95% CI) for ALT elevation within strata of HBsAg-positive status
ALT elevation (>40 IU/L)
 Negative1.00 (Ref.)1.08 (1.02 to 1.13)1.08 (1.02 to 1.13)
 Positive1.97 (1.82 to 2.13)2.72 (2.14 to 3.45)1.43 (1.13 to 1.81)
ALT elevation (>80 IU/L)
 Negative1.00 (Ref.)1.03 (0.93 to 1.14)1.03 (0.93 to 1.14)
 Positive2.39 (2.08 to 2.75)4.07 (2.83 to 5.86)1.85 (1.29 to 2.67)

Measure of interaction on additive scale with respect to ALT elevation (>40 and >80 IU/L): RERI, 0.67 and 1.65, respectively.

Measure of interaction on multiplicative scale with respect to ALT elevation (>40 and >80 IU/L): ratio of ORs, 1.28 and 1.65, respectively.

ORs and 95% CIs were adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, alcohol intake, marital status, education level, night shift work, BMI, waist circumference, HDL-C levels, LDL-C levels and triglyceride levels.

ALT, alanine transaminase; BMI, body mass index; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; OR, odds ratio; Ref., reference; RERI, relative excess risk due to interaction.

Modification of the effect of long working hours (>60 hours per week) on ALT elevation by the HBsAg-positive status Measure of interaction on additive scale with respect to ALT elevation (>40 and >80 IU/L): RERI, 0.67 and 1.65, respectively. Measure of interaction on multiplicative scale with respect to ALT elevation (>40 and >80 IU/L): ratio of ORs, 1.28 and 1.65, respectively. ORs and 95% CIs were adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, alcohol intake, marital status, education level, night shift work, BMI, waist circumference, HDL-C levels, LDL-C levels and <span class="Chemical">triglyceride levels. ALT, alanine transaminase; BMI, body mass index; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein <span class="Chemical">cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; OR, odds ratio; Ref., reference; RERI, relative excess risk due to interaction.

Discussion

Principal findings

Although long working hours are considered to have adverse effects on liver function, there are limited studies that focused on this association. In this study, we found that long working hours were adversely associated with liver function, as indicated by the elevated ALT levels, but only in the HBsAg-positive group. Additionally, the effect of long working hours on ALT elevation was positively modified by the HBsAg status. The association and effect modification were more pronounced when the ALT levels were >80 IU/L than >40 IU/L.

ALT level as a biomarker for liver function

Liver function can be reflected by several biomarkers such as ALT, AST, gamma-glutamyltransferase, platelet and albumin levels. Although the ALT level alone should not be used to determine liver function strictly, it is the most commonly used indicator and is clearly associated with <span class="Disease">liver disease status and prognosis. Kim et al24 showed a strong positive correlation between the ALT level and the risk of liver-related mortality. It is also known that recurrent ALT flares increase the risk of developing cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma through cellular immune response in HBV carriers.25

Psychosocial stress and liver-related health

Psychosocial stress can increase the ALT levels through immune-mediated <span class="Disease">inflammation by activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis and the autonomic nervous system. Thus, secreted glucocorticoids and cytokines play an important role in ALT elevation.13–17 Long working hours can be partly involved in this mechanism by increasing the exposure to work-related psychosocial stress.11 12 Accordingly, our results may partly reflect the effects of psychosocial stress caused by long working hours. This assumption should be confirmed by further investigation in future studies.

Relevant personal health behaviour factors and other potent confounders

We have adjusted for several confounders in logistic regression analysis to focus on the effects of long working hours. Working for many hours may lead to changes in health behaviours, such as increased alcohol consumption and smoking, although this relationship remains controversial.26 27 Therefore, smoking status and <span class="Chemical">alcohol intake were considered as potent confounders; thus, they were included in the multivariate-adjusted regression model. Independently of the personal health behaviours, low socioeconomic status was known to be associated with liver diseases through the cascade starting with psychiatric disorders through to substance abuse and self-harm.28 Night shift work was also positively associated with abnormal liver function owing to circadian disruption.29 Lipid metabolites were found to be closely related to obesity and, as they are metabolised in liver, they are associated with liver function.30 Therefore, to focus on the effect of working for many hours, we adjusted for all potent confounders, such as personal behavioural, social, occupational and clinical factors.

Effects of work-related psychosocial stress in the HBsAg-positive group

Psychosocial stress also influences the clinical course of <span class="Disease">viral hepatitis. Several studies have shown that psychosocial stress adversely affects the immune system and severity of viral hepatitis.31–34 Thus, it is reasonable to expect that long working hours can cause work-related psychosocial stress and ALT elevation in the HBsAg-positive group. Furthermore, we found a positive effect modification of the HBsAg-positive status. However, the same results were not obtained in the general population. This is probably because working for many hours may only have a significant effect on individuals who experience a positive effect modification of the HBsAg-positive status.

Previous studies evaluating long working hours and liver function

There are limited studies that focused on the association between long working hours and liver function. Ochiai et al35 showed that working hours were not associated with elevated ALT levels among Japanese employees. However, they did not consider the influence of important factors such as alcohol intake, smoking status and medication. In contr<span class="Gene">ast, we included these factors in our analysis to reduce confounding bias. Virtanen et al36 showed that long working hours were associated with elevated ALT levels in men. They specifically attributed these findings to adverse metabolic changes, as BMI is a mediator of the association between long working hours and ALT. However, we found consistent results, even after further adjustment for BMI and other metabolic factors, such as waist circumference, HDL-C, LDL-C and triglyceride levels (table 2). Indeed, the association between long working hours and metabolic changes remains controversial.37

Strengths and limitations

Our study had several limitations. First, its cross-sectional design makes it difficult to determine causality. Cohort or longitudinal studies are required to confirm the causal nature of the relationship. Second, even at the same working time, the effect of working hours on liver function might be different because occupational factors, such as the type of work, intensity of the work and exposure to hazardous substances, were not adequately considered. Further research is needed to consider specific and concrete occupational factors and analyse the effects of working for many hours. Third, data on working hours were collected from a self-reported questionnaire, which may have resulted in information bias. Fourth, only night shift work was investigated, and sleeping hours were not included in the analysis. Several studies have shown that night shift work and sleeping hours affect liver function.29 38 39 Therefore, both should be included in the multivariate model in future studies. Finally, our study included relatively well-educated Korean men and <span class="Species">women who were mostly white-collar workers in formal employment. Therefore, our results may not be representative of the general working population. This may have limited our analysis findings regarding the effects of occupation and socioeconomic status on liver function. The effects of long working hours may be greater in the poorer work force and, therefore, may have been underestimated in our study. The generalisability of our findings to other populations still needs to be verified. Despite these limitations, we believe that our study remains valuable because, to the best of our knowledge, it was the first large-scale study conducted in South Korea that evaluated the association between long working hours and liver function using interaction analysis.

Implications

Our findings should not be misinterpreted, as they indicated that the working hours of HBV carriers must be limited. Although liver function deteriorated when the working hours exceeded 60 hours per week in the HBsAg-positive group, there was no effect on liver function within legal working hours. Many studies have addressed other adverse health effects; however, there was no obvious association between long working hours and liver function in the general population.

Conclusions

Long working hours were not associated with liver function in the general population. However, working >60 hours per week was associated with elevated ALT levels in HBV carriers. A positive effect modification of long working hours on liver function by HBsAg-positive status was also observed. Provided that there is adherence to the legal working hours, there is no need to further restrict working hours for liver health, irrespective of HBsAg status. Furthermore, <span class="Species">HBV carriers must not be discriminated against in the workplace because there is no obvious association between legal working hours and liver function, even in HBV carriers.
  34 in total

1.  Recommendations for presenting analyses of effect modification and interaction.

Authors:  Mirjam J Knol; Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 2.  A systematic review of the impact of work environment on smoking cessation, relapse and amount smoked.

Authors:  Karen Albertsen; Vilhelm Borg; Brian Oldenburg
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 3.  The association between long working hours and health: a systematic review of epidemiological evidence.

Authors:  Akira Bannai; Akiko Tamakoshi
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 5.024

4.  Night shift work and abnormal liver function: is non-alcohol fatty liver a necessary mediator?

Authors:  Feng Wang; Liuzhuo Zhang; Suyang Wu; Wentao Li; Miaomiao Sun; Wenting Feng; Ding Ding; Samuel Yeung-Shan Wong; Peng Zhu; Greg J Evans; Yun Kwok Wing; Jihui Zhang; Jelle J Vlaanderen; Roel C H Vermeulen; Yanfang Zhang; Emily Ying-Yang Chan; Zhimin Li; Lap Ah Tse
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Long Working Hours and the Prevalence of Masked and Sustained Hypertension.

Authors:  Xavier Trudel; Chantal Brisson; Mahée Gilbert-Ouimet; Michel Vézina; Denis Talbot; Alain Milot
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 10.190

6.  Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man.

Authors:  D R Matthews; J P Hosker; A S Rudenski; B A Naylor; D F Treacher; R C Turner
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  Hepatitis B virus infection.

Authors:  Yun-Fan Liaw; Chia-Ming Chu
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Long working hours, anthropometry, lung function, blood pressure and blood-based biomarkers: cross-sectional findings from the CONSTANCES study.

Authors:  Marianna Virtanen; Linda Magnusson Hansson; Marcel Goldberg; Marie Zins; Sari Stenholm; Jussi Vahtera; Hugo Westerlund; Mika Kivimäki
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  The Risk of Developing Diabetes in Association With Long Working Hours Differs by Shift Work Schedules.

Authors:  Akira Bannai; Eiji Yoshioka; Yasuaki Saijo; Sachiko Sasaki; Reiko Kishi; Akiko Tamakoshi
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 3.211

10.  Long Working Hours in Korea: Based on the 2014 Korean Working Conditions Survey.

Authors:  Jungsun Park; Yangho Kim; Boyoung Han
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2017-06-30
View more
  1 in total

1.  Association between long working hours and liver enzymes: evidence from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007-2017.

Authors:  Ji-Hun Song; Hyoung-Ryoul Kim; Dong-Wook Lee; Jeehee Min; Yu Min Lee; Mo-Yeol Kang
Journal:  Ann Occup Environ Med       Date:  2022-05-13
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.