Literature DB >> 33375988

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A Turkish uterine sarcoma group study analyzing prognostic factors and disease outcomes.

Ali Ayhan1, Tayfun Toptas2, Murat Oz3, Mehmet Ali Vardar4, Fulya Kayikcioglu5, Nejat Ozgul6, Mehmet Gokcu7, Tayup Simsek8, Mehmet Tunc1, Mehmet Mutlu Meydanli3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate factors associated with refractory disease, recurrence, or death as well as disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in low-grade endometrial sarcoma (LGESS).
METHODS: A multi-institutional, retrospective study was conducted in a total of 124 patients, who received a curative-intent surgery. The exclusion criteria were as follows: i) history of any other invasive disease; ii) neoadjuvant therapy; iii) fertility sparing surgery; iv) a different diagnosis after review of the slides.
RESULTS: All patients underwent hysterectomy, 96% had bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and 65% had lymphadenectomy. Twelve (14.8%) of 81 patients undergoing lymphadenectomy had lymph node (LN) metastasis. Of those, 8 (9.8%) had pelvic LN metastasis whereas 4 (5.6%) had isolated paraaortic LN metastasis. Six of 8 (75%) patients with positive pelvic LNs had concurrent paraaortic LN metastasis. Among 124 patients, 3 patients (2.4%) had refractory disease following primary therapy. During a median follow-up of 45.5 months, 27 (22.3%) of 121 patients who achieved complete remission after primary therapy developed recurrence, and 10 patients (8.1%) died of disease. The 3-year DFS and OS were 76.9% and 93.8%, respectively. Stage was the sole independent prognostic factor in the whole cohort. When analyzing factors within subgroups of stage I and stage ≥II, there was no significant prognostic factor for stage I; however, lymphadenectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy were significantly associated with disease outcomes for stage ≥II. While lymphadenectomy was related with improved DFS, chemotherapy was associated with poor DFS and OS.
CONCLUSION: The risk of LN metastasis at pelvic as well as paraaortic lymphatic basins is not negligible to omit lymphadenectomy in stage ≥II LGESS. Moreover, lymphadenectomy provides significant DFS advantage in patients with extrauterine disease.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low-grade endometrial sarcoma; Lymphadenectomy; Prognostic factors; Survival

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33375988     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  2 in total

1.  Primary characteristics and outcomes of newly diagnosed low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma.

Authors:  Evan S Smith; Corinne Jansen; Kathryn M Miller; Sarah Chiang; Kaled M Alektiar; Martee L Hensley; Jennifer J Mueller; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Mario M Leitao
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.661

2.  Low-Grade Uterine Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma: Prognostic Analysis of Clinico-Pathological Characteristics, Surgical Management, and Adjuvant Treatments. Experience From Two Referral Centers.

Authors:  Fulvio Borella; Luca Bertero; Paola Cassoni; Elisa Piovano; Niccolò Gallio; Mario Preti; Stefano Cosma; Domenico Ferraioli; Luca Pace; Luca Mariani; Nicoletta Biglia; Chiara Benedetto
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 5.738

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.