Anna Pagano1, Sindhu Hosakote2, Kwinoja Kapiteni2, Elana R Straus2, Jessie Wong2, Joseph R Guydish2. 1. Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94118, United States of America. Electronic address: Anna.Pagano@ucsf.edu. 2. Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94118, United States of America.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic may present special challenges for residential substance use disorder (SUD) treatment facilities, which may lack infrastructure and support to implement infection control protocols while maintaining on-site treatment services. However, little is known about how residential SUD treatment programs are impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The research team conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 directors of 20 residential SUD treatment programs across California during the state's shelter-in-place order. The researchers then analyzed qualitative interview data thematically and coded them using ATLAS.ti software. FINDINGS: Thematic analyses identified six major themes: program-level impacts, staff impacts, client impacts, use of telehealth, program needs, and positive effects. "Program-level impacts" were decreased revenue from diminished client censuses and insufficient resources to implement infection control measures. "Staff impacts" included layoffs, furloughs, and increased physical and emotional fatigue. "Client impacts" were delayed treatment initiation; receipt of fewer services while in treatment; lower retention; and economic and psychosocial barriers to community re-entry. "Use of telehealth" included technical and interpersonal challenges associated with telehealth visits. "Program needs" were personal protective equipment (PPE), stimulus funding, hazard pay, and consistent public health guidance. "Positive effects" of the pandemic response included increased attention to hygiene and health, telehealth expansion, operational improvements, and official recognition of SUD treatment as an essential health care service. CONCLUSION: Study findings highlight COVID-related threats to the survival of residential SUD treatment programs; retention of the SUD treatment workforce; and clients' SUD treatment outcomes. These findings also identify opportunities to improve SUD service delivery and suggest avenues of support for residential SUD treatment facilities during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic may present special challenges for residential substance use disorder (SUD) treatment facilities, which may lack infrastructure and support to implement infection control protocols while maintaining on-site treatment services. However, little is known about how residential SUD treatment programs are impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The research team conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 directors of 20 residential SUD treatment programs across California during the state's shelter-in-place order. The researchers then analyzed qualitative interview data thematically and coded them using ATLAS.ti software. FINDINGS: Thematic analyses identified six major themes: program-level impacts, staff impacts, client impacts, use of telehealth, program needs, and positive effects. "Program-level impacts" were decreased revenue from diminished client censuses and insufficient resources to implement infection control measures. "Staff impacts" included layoffs, furloughs, and increased physical and emotional fatigue. "Client impacts" were delayed treatment initiation; receipt of fewer services while in treatment; lower retention; and economic and psychosocial barriers to community re-entry. "Use of telehealth" included technical and interpersonal challenges associated with telehealth visits. "Program needs" were personal protective equipment (PPE), stimulus funding, hazard pay, and consistent public health guidance. "Positive effects" of the pandemic response included increased attention to hygiene and health, telehealth expansion, operational improvements, and official recognition of SUD treatment as an essential health care service. CONCLUSION: Study findings highlight COVID-related threats to the survival of residential SUD treatment programs; retention of the SUD treatment workforce; and clients' SUD treatment outcomes. These findings also identify opportunities to improve SUD service delivery and suggest avenues of support for residential SUD treatment facilities during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Authors: Sharon Reif; Lisa Braude; D Russell Lyman; Richard H Dougherty; Allen S Daniels; Sushmita Shoma Ghose; Onaje Salim; Miriam E Delphin-Rittmon Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Joshua A Barocas; Elizabeth Blackstone; Tara C Bouton; Simeon D Kimmel; Andrea Caputo; Sarah J Porter; Alexander Y Walley Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2020 Sep/Oct Impact factor: 4.647
Authors: Katherine Shircliff; Melissa Liu; Christiana Prestigiacomo; Melissa Fry; Kevin Ladd; Misty Kannapel Gilbert; Mary Jo Rattermann; Melissa A Cyders Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Divane de Vargas; Caroline Figueira Pereira; Rosa Jacinto Volpato; Ana Vitória Corrêa Lima; Rogério da Silva Ferreira; Sheila Ramos de Oliveira; Thiago Faustino Aguilar Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-18 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Randolph D Hubach; Andrew M O'Neil; Campbell Ernst; Mollie Stowe; Mark Hickey; Molly Remondino; Zachary Giano Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Rep Date: 2021-11-22