Jochen René Thyrian1,2, Friederike Kracht3, Angela Nikelski4, Melanie Boekholt3, Fanny Schumacher-Schönert3, Anika Rädke3, Bernhard Michalowsky3, Horst Christian Vollmar5, Wolfgang Hoffmann3,6, Francisca S Rodriguez3, Stefan H Kreisel4. 1. German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), site Rostock/ Greifswald, Ellernholzstr. 1-2, 17489, Greifswald, Germany. rene.thyrian@dzne.de. 2. Institute for Community Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany. rene.thyrian@dzne.de. 3. German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), site Rostock/ Greifswald, Ellernholzstr. 1-2, 17489, Greifswald, Germany. 4. Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, University Hospital OWL - Campus Bielefeld-Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany. 5. Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ruhr-University Bochum (RUB), Bochum, Germany. 6. Institute for Community Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The outbreak of the Corona virus is a challenge for health care systems worldwide. The aim of this study is to analyze a) knowledge about, and feelings related to the Corona-pandemic. Describe b) loneliness, depression and anxiety and, c) the perceived, immediate impact of the lockdown on frequency of social contacts and quality of health care provision of people with cognitive impairment during social distancing and lockdown in the primary care system and living at home in Germany. METHODS: This analysis is based on data of a telephone-based assessment in a convenience sample of n = 141 people with known cognitive impairment in the primary care setting. Data on e.g. cognitive and psychological status prior to the pandemic was available. Attitudes, knowledge about and perceived personal impact of the pandemic, social support, loneliness, anxiety, depression, change in the frequency of social activities due to the pandemic and perceived impact of the pandemic on health care related services were assessed during the time of lockdown. RESULTS: The vast majority of participants are sufficiently informed about Corona (85%) and most think that the measures taken are appropriate (64%). A total of 11% shows one main symptom of a depression according to DSM-5. The frequency of depressive symptoms has not increased between the time before pandemic and lockdown in almost all participants. The sample shows minimal (65.0%) or low symptoms of anxiety (25%). The prevalence of loneliness is 10%. On average seven activities have decreased in frequency due to the pandemic. Social activities related to meeting people, dancing or visiting birthdays have decreased significantly. Talking with friends by phone and activities like gardening have increased. Utilization of health care services like day clinics, relief services and prescribed therapies have been reported to have worsened due to the pandemic. Visits to general practitioners decreased. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows a small impact of the pandemic on psychological variables like depression, anxiety and loneliness in the short-term in Germany. There is a decrease in social activities as expected. The impact on health care provision is prominent. There is a need for qualitative, in-depth studies to further interpret the results.
BACKGROUND: The outbreak of the Corona virus is a challenge for health care systems worldwide. The aim of this study is to analyze a) knowledge about, and feelings related to the Corona-pandemic. Describe b) loneliness, depression and anxiety and, c) the perceived, immediate impact of the lockdown on frequency of social contacts and quality of health care provision of people with cognitive impairment during social distancing and lockdown in the primary care system and living at home in Germany. METHODS: This analysis is based on data of a telephone-based assessment in a convenience sample of n = 141 people with known cognitive impairment in the primary care setting. Data on e.g. cognitive and psychological status prior to the pandemic was available. Attitudes, knowledge about and perceived personal impact of the pandemic, social support, loneliness, anxiety, depression, change in the frequency of social activities due to the pandemic and perceived impact of the pandemic on health care related services were assessed during the time of lockdown. RESULTS: The vast majority of participants are sufficiently informed about Corona (85%) and most think that the measures taken are appropriate (64%). A total of 11% shows one main symptom of a depression according to DSM-5. The frequency of depressive symptoms has not increased between the time before pandemic and lockdown in almost all participants. The sample shows minimal (65.0%) or low symptoms of anxiety (25%). The prevalence of loneliness is 10%. On average seven activities have decreased in frequency due to the pandemic. Social activities related to meeting people, dancing or visiting birthdays have decreased significantly. Talking with friends by phone and activities like gardening have increased. Utilization of health care services like day clinics, relief services and prescribed therapies have been reported to have worsened due to the pandemic. Visits to general practitioners decreased. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows a small impact of the pandemic on psychological variables like depression, anxiety and loneliness in the short-term in Germany. There is a decrease in social activities as expected. The impact on health care provision is prominent. There is a need for qualitative, in-depth studies to further interpret the results.
Entities:
Keywords:
COVID-19; Dementia; Germany; Social distancing
Authors: N S N Graham; C Junghans; R Downes; C Sendall; H Lai; A McKirdy; P Elliott; R Howard; D Wingfield; M Priestman; M Ciechonska; L Cameron; M Storch; M A Crone; P S Freemont; P Randell; R McLaren; N Lang; S Ladhani; F Sanderson; D J Sharp Journal: J Infect Date: 2020-06-03 Impact factor: 6.072
Authors: Fiona E Lithander; Sandra Neumann; Emma Tenison; Katherine Lloyd; Tomas J Welsh; Jonathan C L Rodrigues; Julian P T Higgins; Lily Scourfield; Hannah Christensen; Victoria J Haunton; Emily J Henderson Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Emily West; Pushpa Nair; Yolanda Barrado-Martin; Kate R Walters; Nuriye Kupeli; Elizabeth L Sampson; Nathan Davies Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-05-18 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Ilaria Chirico; Giovanni Ottoboni; Clarissa Giebel; Alessandro Pappadà; Marco Valente; Valentina Degli Esposti; Mark Gabbay; Rabih Chattat Journal: Health Soc Care Community Date: 2022-02-20
Authors: Angela Nikelski; Eva Trompetter; Stefanie Feldmann; Esther-Sarah Whittaker; Melanie Boekholt; Nino Chikhradze; Friederike Kracht; Petra Lücker; Horst Christian Vollmar; Jochen René Thyrian; Stefan H Kreisel Journal: Z Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2021-04-15 Impact factor: 1.281
Authors: Giacomo Tondo; Barbara Sarasso; Paola Serra; Fabiana Tesser; Cristoforo Comi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-18 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Clarissa Giebel; Sarah Robertson; Audrey Beaulen; Sandra Zwakhalen; Dawn Allen; Hilde Verbeek Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-22 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Serena Sabatini; Holly Q Bennett; Anthony Martyr; Rachel Collins; Laura D Gamble; Fiona E Matthews; Claire Pentecost; Eleanor Dawson; Anna Hunt; Sophie Parker; Louise Allan; Alistair Burns; Rachael Litherland; Catherine Quinn; Linda Clare Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-03-09 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Elena Caroline Weitzel; Margrit Löbner; Susanne Röhr; Alexander Pabst; Ulrich Reininghaus; Steffi G Riedel-Heller Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-07-05 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Kathy Y Liu; Robert Howard; Sube Banerjee; Adelina Comas-Herrera; Joanne Goddard; Martin Knapp; Gill Livingston; Jill Manthorpe; John T O'Brien; Ross W Paterson; Louise Robinson; Martin Rossor; James B Rowe; David J Sharp; Andrew Sommerlad; Aida Suárez-González; Alistair Burns Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 3.850