Sosse E Klarenbeek1, Olga C J Schuurbiers-Siebers2, Michel M van den Heuvel2, Mathias Prokop1, Marcia Tummers3. 1. Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 3. Department for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oncological computerized clinical decision support systems (CCDSSs) to facilitate workflows of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs) are currently being developed. To successfully implement these CCDSSs in MDTMs, this study aims to: (a) identify barriers and facilitators for implementation for the use case of lung cancer; and (b) provide actionable findings for an implementation strategy. METHODS: The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Science was used to create an interview protocol and to analyze the results. Semi-structured interviews were conducted among various health care professionals involved in MDTMs. The transcripts were analyzed using a thematic analysis following a deductive approach. RESULTS: Twenty-six professionals participated in the interviews. The main facilitators for implementation of the CCDSS were considered to be easy access to well-structured patient data, and the resulting reduction of MDTM preparation time and of duration of MDTMs. Main barriers for adoption were seen in incomplete or non-trustworthy output generated by the system and insufficient adaptability of the system to local and contextual needs. CONCLUSION: Using a CCDSS in lung cancer MDTMs was expected to increase efficiency of workflows. Successful implementation was seen as dependent on the reliability and adaptability of the CCDSS and involvement of key users in the implementation process.
BACKGROUND: Oncological computerized clinical decision support systems (CCDSSs) to facilitate workflows of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs) are currently being developed. To successfully implement these CCDSSs in MDTMs, this study aims to: (a) identify barriers and facilitators for implementation for the use case oflung cancer; and (b) provide actionable findings for an implementation strategy. METHODS: The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Science was used to create an interview protocol and to analyze the results. Semi-structured interviews were conducted among various health care professionals involved in MDTMs. The transcripts were analyzed using a thematic analysis following a deductive approach. RESULTS: Twenty-six professionals participated in the interviews. The main facilitators for implementation of the CCDSS were considered to be easy access to well-structured patient data, and the resulting reduction ofMDTM preparation time and of duration ofMDTMs. Main barriers for adoption were seen in incomplete or non-trustworthy output generated by the system and insufficient adaptability of the system to local and contextual needs. CONCLUSION: Using a CCDSS in lung cancer MDTMs was expected to increase efficiency of workflows. Successful implementation was seen as dependent on the reliability and adaptability of the CCDSS and involvement of key users in the implementation process.
Entities:
Keywords:
clinical decision support systems; multidisciplinary team meetings; oncology; pre-implementation; qualitative research
Authors: Laura J Damschroder; David C Aron; Rosalind E Keith; Susan R Kirsh; Jeffery A Alexander; Julie C Lowery Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2009-08-07 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Brindha Pillay; Addie C Wootten; Helen Crowe; Niall Corcoran; Ben Tran; Patrick Bowden; Jane Crowe; Anthony J Costello Journal: Cancer Treat Rev Date: 2015-11-24 Impact factor: 12.111
Authors: Pavel S Roshanov; Shikha Misra; Hertzel C Gerstein; Amit X Garg; Rolf J Sebaldt; Jean A Mackay; Lorraine Weise-Kelly; Tamara Navarro; Nancy L Wilczynski; R Brian Haynes Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2011-08-03 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Marjolein Lugtenberg; Dennis Pasveer; Trudy van der Weijden; Gert P Westert; Rudolf B Kool Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2015-10-16 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Stijn Van de Velde; Annemie Heselmans; Nicolas Delvaux; Linn Brandt; Luis Marco-Ruiz; David Spitaels; Hanne Cloetens; Tiina Kortteisto; Pavel Roshanov; Ilkka Kunnamo; Bert Aertgeerts; Per Olav Vandvik; Signe Flottorp Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2018-08-20 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Jon R Pluyter; Igor Jacobs; Sander Langereis; David Cobben; Sharon Williams; Jeannine Curfs; Ben van den Borne Journal: Transl Lung Cancer Res Date: 2020-08