Literature DB >> 33375297

Advanced Statistical Analysis of 3D Kinect Data: Mimetic Muscle Rehabilitation Following Head and Neck Surgeries Causing Facial Paresis.

Jan Kohout1, Ludmila Verešpejová2, Pavel Kříž3, Lenka Červená3, Karel Štícha1, Jan Crha1, Kateřina Trnková2, Martin Chovanec2, Jan Mareš1.   

Abstract

An advanced statistical analysis of patients' faces after specific surgical procedures that temporarily negatively affect the patient's mimetic muscles is presented. For effective planning of rehabilitation, which typically lasts several months, it is crucial to correctly evaluate the improvement of the mimetic muscle function. The current way of describing the development of rehabilitation depends on the subjective opinion and expertise of the clinician and is not very precise concerning when the most common classification (House-Brackmann scale) is used. Our system is based on a stereovision Kinect camera and an advanced mathematical approach that objectively quantifies the mimetic muscle function independently of the clinician's opinion. To effectively deal with the complexity of the 3D camera input data and uncertainty of the evaluation process, we designed a three-stage data-analytic procedure combining the calculation of indicators determined by clinicians with advanced statistical methods including functional data analysis and ordinal (multiple) logistic regression. We worked with a dataset of 93 distinct patients and 122 sets of measurements. In comparison to the classification with the House-Brackmann scale the developed system is able to automatically monitor reinnervation of mimetic muscles giving us opportunity to discriminate even small improvements during the course of rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  House–Brackmann scale; Kinect; functional data analysis; ordinal classification; rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33375297      PMCID: PMC7795302          DOI: 10.3390/s21010103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sensors (Basel)        ISSN: 1424-8220            Impact factor:   3.576


  14 in total

1.  Approaches to grading facial nerve function.

Authors:  Michael J Brenner; J Gail Neely
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 2.  Enhanced computer vision with Microsoft Kinect sensor: a review.

Authors:  Jungong Han; Ling Shao; Dong Xu; Jamie Shotton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Cybern       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 11.448

Review 3.  Facial nerve grading instruments: systematic review of the literature and suggestion for uniformity.

Authors:  Adel Y Fattah; Anthony D R Gurusinghe; Javier Gavilan; Tessa A Hadlock; Jeff R Marcus; Henri Marres; Charles C Nduka; William H Slattery; Alison K Snyder-Warwick
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Interobserver variability of the House-Brackmann facial nerve grading system for the analysis of a randomized multi-center phase III trial.

Authors:  Christian Scheller; Andreas Wienke; Marcos Tatagiba; Alireza Gharabaghi; Kristofer F Ramina; Konstanze Scheller; Julian Prell; Johannes Zenk; Oliver Ganslandt; Barbara Bischoff; Cordula Matthies; Thomas Westermaier; Gregor Antoniadis; Maria Teresa Pedro; Veit Rohde; Kajetan von Eckardstein; Thomas Kretschmer; Malte Kornhuber; Fred G Barker; Christian Strauss
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Facial synkinesis outcome measures: A systematic review of the available grading systems and a Delphi study to identify the steps towards a consensus.

Authors:  Juan Enrique Berner; Pragash Kamalathevan; Ioannis Kyriazidis; Charles Nduka
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Facial nerve grading system.

Authors:  J W House; D E Brackmann
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  Significance of House-Brackmann facial nerve grading global score in the setting of differential facial nerve function.

Authors:  Thomas L Yen; Colin L W Driscoll; Anil K Lalwani
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 8.  Diagnostics and therapy of vestibular schwannomas - an interdisciplinary challenge.

Authors:  Steffen Rosahl; Christopher Bohr; Michael Lell; Klaus Hamm; Heinrich Iro
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

9.  Functional vs. Traditional Analysis in Biomechanical Gait Data: An Alternative Statistical Approach.

Authors:  Jihong Park; Matthew K Seeley; Devin Francom; C Shane Reese; J Ty Hopkins
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.193

10.  RecoverNow: A mobile tablet-based therapy platform for early stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Michael Pugliese; Tim Ramsay; Rany Shamloul; Karen Mallet; Lise Zakutney; Dale Corbett; Sean Dukelow; Grant Stotts; Michel Shamy; Kumanan Wilson; Julien Guerinet; Dar Dowlatshahi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Upper Limb Movement Measurement Systems for Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Celia Francisco-Martínez; Juan Prado-Olivarez; José A Padilla-Medina; Javier Díaz-Carmona; Francisco J Pérez-Pinal; Alejandro I Barranco-Gutiérrez; Juan J Martínez-Nolasco
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.576

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.