Literature DB >> 33373612

Abortion method preference among people presenting for abortion care.

Erin Wingo1, Lauren Ralph2, Shelly Kaller2, M Antonia Biggs2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore abortion method preference, interpersonal and cultural factors associated with preference, and whether, among people with a preference for medication abortion, those presenting past 10 weeks gestation had experienced more obstacles to care.
METHODS: In 2019, we invited people aged 15-45 years presenting to four U.S. abortion clinics to complete a self-administered, anonymous iPad survey prior to seeing the healthcare provider. Questions focused on their pregnancy, including self-reported gestational age and experiences accessing abortion care, including abortion method preference. We used multivariate logistic regression to assess associations between worry about perceived pregnancy-related stigma or abortion-related health myths and abortion method preference.
RESULTS: The majority (784 [77%]) of those approached (1092) initiated the survey and 712 responded to the preference question. Most (597 [84%]) preferred a method: 246 (41%) preferred medication abortion and 351 (59%) an in-clinic procedure. About one-third (110 [32%]) of those preferring medication abortion exceeded 10 weeks gestation and 83% (n=91) had experienced delay-causing obstacles to care. In multivariate analyses, we found a greater odds of preference for medication abortion over in-clinic procedure among those very worried about people's reaction to the pregnancy (aOR 1.95, 95% CI 1.16-3.28), judgment from God or religion (aOR 1.93, 95% CI 1.17-3.19) and abortion affecting mental health (aOR 2.51, 95% CI 1.45-4.34) or ability to get pregnant later (aOR 1.80, 95% CI: 1.09-2.97).
CONCLUSIONS: Many people seeking abortion have a method preference; delayed presentation to care may impede ability to obtain desired method. Pregnancy-related stigma and misinformation are associated with preference for medication abortion.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abortion; access; barriers to abortion; medication abortion; patient preferences

Year:  2020        PMID: 33373612     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  1 in total

1.  Seeking abortion care in Ohio and Texas during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Emma Carpenter; Hillary Gyuras; Kristen L Burke; Danielle Czarnecki; Danielle Bessett; Michelle McGowan; Kari White
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 3.051

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.