Literature DB >> 33373605

Views on the need to implement restriction policies to be able to address COVID-19 in the United States.

Vivian Hsing-Chun Wang1, José A Pagán2.   

Abstract

Several restriction policies implemented in many states in the United States have demonstrated their effectiveness in mitigating the spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), but less is known about the differences in views on the restriction policies among different population segments. This study aimed to understand which different population groups of adults in the United States consider several key restriction policies as necessary to combat COVID-19. Survey data from Wave 64 (March 19-24, 2020) of the Pew Research Center's American Trends Panel (n=10,609) and logistic regression were used to evaluate the association between socioeconomic and demographic characteristics, employment status, political party affiliation, news exposure, census region, and opinions about COVID-19 restriction policies. The policies included restricting international travel, imposing business closures, banning large group gatherings, cancelling entertainment events, closing schools, limiting restaurants to carry-out only, and postponing state primary elections. Most survey respondents viewed COVID-19 restriction policies as necessary. Views on each restriction policy varied substantially across some population segments such as age, race, and ethnicity. Regardless of population segments, those who followed news closely or considered themselves Democrat/lean Democrat were more likely to consider all the policies as necessary than those not following the news closely or those who considered themselves Republican/lean Republican. The effectiveness of key COVID-19 restriction policies is likely to vary substantially across population groups given that views on the need to implement these policies vary widely. Tailored health messages may be needed for some population segments given divergent views on COVID-19 restriction policies.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Disease prevention; Health promotion; Public health communication

Year:  2020        PMID: 33373605     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  5 in total

Review 1.  Post-Pandemic Stress Disorder as an Effect of the Epidemiological Situation Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Daria Łaskawiec; Mateusz Grajek; Patryk Szlacheta; Ilona Korzonek-Szlacheta
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-24

2.  Association of Republican partisanship with US citizens' mobility during the first period of the COVID crisis.

Authors:  Guillaume Barbalat; Nicolas Franck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Associations Between Governor Political Affiliation and COVID-19 Cases, Deaths, and Testing in the U.S.

Authors:  Brian Neelon; Fedelis Mutiso; Noel T Mueller; John L Pearce; Sara E Benjamin-Neelon
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  The impact of the COVID-19, social distancing, and movement restrictions on crime in NSW, Australia.

Authors:  Joanna J J Wang; Thomas Fung; Donald Weatherburn
Journal:  Crime Sci       Date:  2021-10-24

5.  Reconsidering the role of place in health and welfare services: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States and Canada.

Authors:  G Allen Ratliff; Cindy A Sousa; Genevieve Graaf; Bree Akesson; Susan P Kemp
Journal:  Socioecol Pract Res       Date:  2022-04-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.